Imaginaries of place in territorialization processes:Transforming the Oyacachi<i> páramos</i> through nature conservation and water transfers in the Ecuadorian highlands

How Ecuadorian páramos are perceived has drastically changed over the last five decades. From cold, hostile, and unproductive hinterlands, páramos have changed to become areas for biodiversity conservation and ‘water towers’ that ought to be protected to provide clean and abundant water for cities and irrigation. To understand how these changing perceptions of páramos relate to interventions and their on-the-ground negotiation by local communities, we develop the notion of imaginaries of place and explore its relations to notions of governmentality and territorialization. We show how, based on changing imaginaries of what páramos are, state and non-state interventions have tried to control the Oyacachi páramos in the Northern Ecuadorian Highlands for the specific purpose of nature and water conservation. At the same time, we show that these interventions are highly contested on-the-ground. This leads to confrontations, negotiations, and a re-definition of the imaginaries of place there exist. Our analysis expounds the relevance of understanding imaginaries of place and its close relations to interventions and their negotiation

Water, Food, and Irrigation

Irrigated agriculture plays a central role in global food production as it provides resilience to rainfall variability, increased productivity and production security. However, it has also gone hand in hand with serious socio-environmental challenges. Large-scale irrigated agricultural production, which depends on both surface and groundwater resources, has encountered several technical and managerial challenges. It has led to widespread environmental deterioration through drying and polluting rivers, lakes, wetlands, and aquifers. At the same time, irrigated agricultural production has been increasingly commodified, specialized and globalized through large commercial farming enterprises, contract farming and international agro-export chains. This has led to widespread processes of land and water accumulation and related socio-environmental inequities in many regions of the world. In contraposition to this tendency peasant irrigated production plays a key role in producing for local and regional fresh food markets. In this context, we explore a few innovative and promising grassroots initiatives that spring from peasant agriculture. These are agro-ecology, farmer-led irrigation development and peri-urban agriculture, all initiatives that rest on the creation of local food production and marketing networks. Finally, this book chapter closes by setting out critical questions about policies and the political implications of food consumption patterns

Satellite‐Based Monitoring of Irrigation Water Use: Assessing Measurement Errors and Their Implications for Agricultural Water Management Policy

Reliable accounting of agricultural water use is critical for sustainable water management. However, the majority of agricultural water use is not monitored, with limited metering of irrigation despite increasing pressure on both groundwater and surface water resources in many agricultural regions worldwide. Satellite remote sensing has been proposed as a low-cost and scalable solution to fill widespread gaps in monitoring of irrigation water use in both developed and developing countries, bypassing the technical, socioeconomic, and political challenges that to date have constrained in situ metering. In this paper, we show through a systematic meta-analysis that the relative accuracy of different satellite-based irrigation water use monitoring approaches remains poorly understood, with evidence of large uncertainties when water use estimates are validated against in situ irrigation data at both field and regional scales. Subsequently, we demonstrate that water use measurement errors result in large economic welfare losses for farmers and may negatively impact ability of policies to limit acute and nonlinear externalities of irrigation abstraction on both the environment and other water users. Our findings highlight that water resource planners must consider the trade-offs between accuracy and costs associated with different water use accounting approaches. Remote sensing has an important role to play in supporting improved agricultural water accounting—both independently and in combination with in situ monitoring. However, greater transparency and evidence is needed about underlying uncertainties in satellite-based models, along with how these measurement errors affect the performance of associated policies to manage different short- and long-term externalities of irrigation water use

The social construction and consequences of groundwater modelling: insight from the Mancha Oriental aquifer, Spain

[EN] Groundwater flow models have been increasingly used to support policy making. A substantial amount of research has been dedicated to improving, validating and calibrating models and including stakeholders in the modelling process. However, little research has been done to analyze how the choices of model makers and steering by policy makers result in models with specific characteristics, which only allow specific modelling outcomes, and how the use of these modelling outcomes leads to specific social, economic and environmental consequences. In this study, we use the social construction of technology framework to explore the development, characteristics and uses of the groundwater model of the Mancha Oriental aquifer in Spain. The specific characteristics and functioning of this model influenced the policy implementation, implying that involving stakeholders in the development and use of models is crucial for improved democratic policy making.This work was carried out as part of the collaboration agreement between the University of Castilla–La Mancha and Wageningen University. The research is also part of Femke Rambags’ MSc Thesis. David Sanz was supported by the Grants for Stays at Other Universities and Research Centres (UCLM). Special thanks go to the Júcar Water Authority (CHJ) and stakeholders (JCRMO) in the Mancha Oriental System for the necessary information. We would also like to thank Dr A. Sahuquillo of the Universitat Politècnica de València de Valencia and Dr S. Castaño of the University of Castilla–La Mancha for comments and participation in the first stage of modelling. The contents of this paper do not represent the views of CHJ or JCRMO. Finally, we thank the two anonymous reviewers of this article for their valuable comments and suggestions.Sanz Martínez, D.; Vos, J.; Rambags, F.; Hoogesteger, J.; Cassiraga, EF.; Gómez-Alday, JJ. (2018). The social construction and consequences of groundwater modelling: insight from the Mancha Oriental aquifer, Spain. International Journal of Water Resources Development. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2018.1495619S122Beall, A. M., & Ford, A. (2010). Reports from the Field. International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change, 1(2), 72-89. doi:10.4018/jissc.2010040105Beven, K. (2000). On model uncertainty, risk and decision making. Hydrological Processes, 14(14), 2605-2606. doi:10.1002/1099-1085(20001015)14:143.0.co;2-wBijker, W. E. (s. f.). Social Construction of Technology. A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, 88-94. doi:10.1002/9781444310795.ch15Bots, P. W. G., Bijlsma, R., von Korff, Y., Van der Fluit, N., & Wolters, H. (2011). Supporting the Constructive Use of Existing Hydrological Models in Participatory Settings: a Set of &#8220;Rules of the Game&#8221; Ecology and Society, 16(2). doi:10.5751/es-03643-160216Budds, J. (2009). Contested H2O: Science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile. Geoforum, 40(3), 418-430. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008CALERA, A., GARRIDO-RUBIO, J., BELMONTE, M., ARELLANO, I., FRAILE, L., CAMPOS, I., & OSANN, A. (2017). REMOTE SENSING-BASED WATER ACCOUNTING TO SUPPORT GOVERNANCE FOR GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT FOR IRRIGATION IN LA MANCHA ORIENTAL AQUIFER, SPAIN. Water Resources Management IX. doi:10.2495/wrm170121Cassiraga, E., Sanz, D., Castaño, S. Álvarez, O. & Sahuquillo, A. (2013). Modelo de flujo subterráneo de los acuíferos de la Mancha Oriental y sus relaciones con el río Júcar [Groundwater model flow of the Mancha Oriental Aquifer and their relations with the Júcar River]. Unpublished report (pp 77). Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar.Castaño, S., Sanz, D., & Gómez-Alday, J. J. (2009). Methodology for Quantifying Groundwater Abstractions for Agriculture via Remote Sensing and GIS. Water Resources Management, 24(4), 795-814. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9473-7Castaño, S., Sanz, D., & Gómez-Alday, J. J. (2013). Sensitivity of a Groundwater Flow Model to Both Climatic Variations and Management Scenarios in a Semi-arid Region of SE Spain. Water Resources Management, 27(7), 2089-2101. doi:10.1007/s11269-013-0277-4Castilla-Rho, J. C. (2017). Groundwater Modeling with Stakeholders: Finding the Complexity that Matters. Groundwater, 55(5), 620-625. doi:10.1111/gwat.12569Doherty, J., & Simmons, C. T. (2013). Groundwater modelling in decision support: reflections on a unified conceptual framework. Hydrogeology Journal, 21(7), 1531-1537. doi:10.1007/s10040-013-1027-7Ferrer, J. & Garijo, L. (2013). Mercados del agua y flexibilización del marco concesional [Water markets and flexibilization of the concessional framework]. XI Semin. Nac. “Transparencia y concesiones” Obs. del Agua la Fund. Botín.Forsyth, T. (2004). Critical Political Ecology. doi:10.4324/9780203017562Giordano, M. (2009). Global Groundwater? Issues and Solutions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 153-178. doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.030308.100251Hernández-Mora, N., del Moral Ituarte, L., La-Roca, F., La Calle, A., & Schmidt, G. (2014). Interbasin Water Transfers in Spain: Interregional Conflicts and Governance Responses. Globalized Water, 175-194. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7323-3_13Holley, C., Sinclair, D., Lopez-Gunn, E., & Schlager, E. (2016). Conjunctive Management Through Collective Action. Integrated Groundwater Management, 229-252. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23576-9_9Hoogesteger, J., & Wester, P. (2015). Intensive groundwater use and (in)equity: Processes and governance challenges. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 117-124. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2015.04.004Hoogesteger, J., & Wester, P. (2017). Regulating groundwater use: The challenges of policy implementation in Guanajuato, Central Mexico. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 107-113. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.002Jakeman, A. J., Barreteau, O., Hunt, R. J., Rinaudo, J.-D., Ross, A., Arshad, M., & Hamilton, S. (2016). Integrated Groundwater Management: An Overview of Concepts and Challenges. Integrated Groundwater Management, 3-20. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23576-9_1Kahil, M. T., Ward, F. A., Albiac, J., Eggleston, J., & Sanz, D. (2016). Hydro-economic modeling with aquifer–river interactions to guide sustainable basin management. Journal of Hydrology, 539, 510-524. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.05.057Konikow, L. F., & Bredehoeft, J. D. (1992). Ground-water models cannot be validated. Advances in Water Resources, 15(1), 75-83. doi:10.1016/0309-1708(92)90033-xKonikow, L. F., & Kendy, E. (2005). Groundwater depletion: A global problem. Hydrogeology Journal, 13(1), 317-320. doi:10.1007/s10040-004-0411-8Lopez-Gunn, E. (2003). The Role of Collective Action in Water Governance: A Comparative Study of Groundwater User Associations in La Mancha Aquifers in Spain. Water International, 28(3), 367-378. doi:10.1080/02508060308691711Massuel, S., Cappelaere, B., Favreau, G., Leduc, C., Lebel, T., & Vischel, T. (2011). Integrated surface water–groundwater modelling in the context of increasing water reserves of a regional Sahelian aquifer. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56(7), 1242-1264. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.609171Melsen, L. A., Addor, N., Mizukami, N., Newman, A. J., Torfs, P. J. J. F., Clark, M. P., … Teuling, A. J. (2018). Mapping (dis)agreement in hydrologic projections. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(3), 1775-1791. doi:10.5194/hess-22-1775-2018MOLLE, F. (2008). Why Enough Is Never Enough: The Societal Determinants of River Basin Closure. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(2), 217-226. doi:10.1080/07900620701723646Narain, V., & Singh, A. K. (2017). Flowing against the current: The socio-technical mediation of water (in)security in periurban Gurgaon, India. Geoforum, 81, 66-75. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.02.010Pérez, M. A. (2005). Modelo distribuido de simulación del ciclo hidrológico con calidad de aguas integrado en sistemas de información geográfica para grandes cuencas [Distributed model of simulation of the hydrological cycle with water quality integrated in geographic information systems for large basins]. (Ph.D. Thesis). Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Spain.Rambags, F. (2014). The social shaping of the hydrological model of the Mancha Oriental System. (Msc Thesis Water resources management). Wageningen University.Refsgaard, J. C., & Henriksen, H. J. (2004). Modelling guidelines––terminology and guiding principles. Advances in Water Resources, 27(1), 71-82. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2003.08.006Sanz, D., Calera, A., Castaño, S., & Gómez-Alday, J. J. (2015). Knowledge, participation, and transparency in groundwater management. Water Policy, wp2015024. doi:10.2166/wp.2015.024Sanz, D., Castaño, S., Cassiraga, E., Sahuquillo, A., Gómez-Alday, J. J., Peña, S., & Calera, A. (2011). Modeling aquifer–river interactions under the influence of groundwater abstraction in the Mancha Oriental System (SE Spain). Hydrogeology Journal, 19(2), 475-487. doi:10.1007/s10040-010-0694-xSanz, D., Gómez-Alday, J. J., Castaño, S., Moratalla, A., De las Heras, J., & Martínez-Alfaro, P. E. (2009). Hydrostratigraphic framework and hydrogeological behaviour of the Mancha Oriental System (SE Spain). Hydrogeology Journal, 17(6), 1375-1391. doi:10.1007/s10040-009-0446-yTortajada, C. (2010). Water Governance: Some Critical Issues. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 26(2), 297-307. doi:10.1080/07900621003683298Vaux, H. (2010). Groundwater under stress: the importance of management. Environmental Earth Sciences, 62(1), 19-23. doi:10.1007/s12665-010-0490-xVoinov, A., & Bousquet, F. (2010). Modelling with stakeholders☆. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1268-1281. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007Voinov, A., Kolagani, N., McCall, M. K., Glynn, P. D., Kragt, M. E., Ostermann, F. O., … Ramu, P. (2016). Modelling with stakeholders – Next generation. Environmental Modelling & Software, 77, 196-220. doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.11.016Voss, C. I. (2011). Editor’s message: Groundwater modeling fantasies —part 1, adrift in the details. Hydrogeology Journal, 19(7), 1281-1284. doi:10.1007/s10040-011-0789-zWester, P., Hoogesteger, J. & Vincent, L. (2009). Local IWRM organizations for groundwater regulation: The experiences of the Aquifer Management Councils (COTAS) in Guanajuato, Mexico. Natural Resources Forum 33(1), 29–38. doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2009.01206.