GPs' strategies in intercultural clinical encounters

Background. In North America and Europe, patients and physicians are increasingly likely to come from non-Western cultural backgrounds. The expectations of these patients may not match those of physicians. Objective. To identify strategies used by GPs with patients from cultures other than their own. Methods. We conducted a qualitative inductive study based on 25 semi-structured interviews with family physicians practising in Montreal, Canada. We elicited physicians' strategies when dealing with patients from a cultural background different from their own. We began by asking physicians to describe an encounter they found difficult and one they found easy. Results. Physicians reported three types of strategies: (i) insistence on patient adaptation to local beliefs and behaviours; (ii) physician adaptation to what he or she assumed patients wanted; and (iii) negotiation of a mutually acceptable plan. Individual physicians did not adopt the same strategy in all situations. Their choice of strategy depended on the topic. When dealing with issues they felt deeply about, such as the autonomy of women, many physicians insisted on patient adaptation. Physicians used a patient-centred model of care, but had no framework to elicit information about patients' culture. Conclusions. A patient-centred model of care enables physicians to consult effectively despite a wide range of cultural differences between themselves and their patients. However, their lack of a conceptual framework for addressing cultural difference prevents systematic data collection and consideration of challenges to respect for individual autonomy. Physician training should include the provision of an explicit conceptual framework for approaching patients from a different cultur

The interpretation of low mood and worry by high users of secondary care with medically unexplained symptoms

DA - 20111021 IS - 1471-2296 (Electronic) IS - 1471-2296 (Linking) LA - eng PT - Journal Article SB - IMPeer reviewedPublisher PD

Between history and values: A study on the nature of interpretation in international law

My thesis discusses the place of evaluative judgements in the interpretation of general international law. It concentrates on two questions. First, whether it is possible to interpret international legal practices without making an evaluative judgement about the point or value that provides the best justification of these practices. Second, whether the use of evaluative judgements in international legal interpretation threatens to undermine the objectivity of international law, the neutrality of international lawyers or the consensual and voluntary basis of the international legal system. I answer both questions in the negative. As regards the first, I argue that international legal practice has an interpretive structure, which combines appeals to the history of international practice with appeals to the principles and values that these practices are best understood as promoting. This interpretive structure is apparent not only in the claims of international lawyers about particular rules of international law (here I use the rule of estoppel as an example) but also in the most basic intuitions of international theorists about the theory and sources of general international law. I then argue that some popular concerns to the effect that the exercise of evaluation in the interpretation of international law will undermine the coherence or the usefulness of the discipline are generally unwarranted. The fact that international legal practice has an interpretive structure does not entail that propositions of international law are only subjectively true, that the interpreter enjoys license to manipulate their meaning for self-serving purposes, or that international law will collapse under the weight of irresolvable disagreements, divisions and conflicts about its proper interpretation

GPs' strategies in intercultural clinical encounters

Background. In North America and Europe, patients and physicians are increasingly likely to come from non-Western cultural backgrounds. The expectations of these patients may not match those of physicians. Objective. To identify strategies used by GPs with patients from cultures other than their own. Methods. We conducted a qualitative inductive study based on 25 semi-structured interviews with family physicians practising in Montreal, Canada. We elicited physicians' strategies when dealing with patients from a cultural background different from their own. We began by asking physicians to describe an encounter they found difficult and one they found easy. Results. Physicians reported three types of strategies: (i) insistence on patient adaptation to local beliefs and behaviours; (ii) physician adaptation to what he or she assumed patients wanted; and (iii) negotiation of a mutually acceptable plan. Individual physicians did not adopt the same strategy in all situations. Their choice of strategy depended on the topic. When dealing with issues they felt deeply about, such as the autonomy of women, many physicians insisted on patient adaptation. Physicians used a patient-centred model of care, but had no framework to elicit information about patients' culture. Conclusions. A patient-centred model of care enables physicians to consult effectively despite a wide range of cultural differences between themselves and their patients. However, their lack of a conceptual framework for addressing cultural difference prevents systematic data collection and consideration of challenges to respect for individual autonomy. Physician training should include the provision of an explicit conceptual framework for approaching patients from a different culture.</p