Resolutions of ideals of fat points with support in a hyperplane

Our results concern minimal graded free resolutions of fat point ideals for points in a hyperplane. Suppose, for example, that I(m,d) is the ideal defining r given points of multiplicity m in the projective space P^d. Assume that the given points lie in a hyperplane P^{d-1} in P^d, and that the ground field k is algebraically closed of characteristic 0. We give an explicit minimal graded free resolution of I(m,d) in k[P^d] in terms of the minimal graded free resolutions of the ideals I(j,d-1) in k[P^{d-1}] with j < m+1. As a corollary, we give the following formula for the Poincare polynomial P_{m,d} of I(m,d) in terms of the Poincare polynomials P_{j,d-1} of I(j,d-1): P_{m,d} = (1 + XT)(\Sigma_{0<j\le m} T^{m-j}(P_{j,d-1} - 1)) + 1 + XT^m.Comment: 10 pages; to appear in Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.; some expositional changes; added a reference to paper of Geramita, Migliore and Sabourin (math.AC/0411445

From the Maccabees to the Mishnah

Reviewed Book: Cohen, Shaye J D. from the Maccabees to the Mishnah. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1987. Library of Early Christianity; 7

J D Bernal: philosophy, politics and the science of science

This paper is an examination of the philosophical and political legacy of John Desmond Bernal. It addresses the evidence of an emerging consensus on Bernal based on the recent biography of Bernal by Andrew Brown and the reviews it has received. It takes issue with this view of Bernal, which tends to be admiring of his scientific contribution, bemused by his sexuality, condescending to his philosophy and hostile to his politics. This article is a critical defence of his philosophical and political position

J D Bernal: philosophy, politics and the science of science

This paper is an examination of the philosophical and political legacy of John Desmond Bernal. It addresses the evidence of an emerging consensus on Bernal based on the recent biography of Bernal by Andrew Brown and the reviews it has received. It takes issue with this view of Bernal, which tends to be admiring of his scientific contribution, bemused by his sexuality, condescending to his philosophy and hostile to his politics. This article is a critical defence of his philosophical and political position

J D Bernal: philosophy, politics and the science of science

This paper is an examination of the philosophical and political legacy of John Desmond Bernal. It addresses the evidence of an emerging consensus on Bernal based on the recent biography of Bernal by Andrew Brown and the reviews it has received. It takes issue with this view of Bernal, which tends to be admiring of his scientific contribution, bemused by his sexuality, condescending to his philosophy and hostile to his politics. This article is a critical defence of his philosophical and political position

J. D. Howerton

J. D. Howertonhttps://scholarsjunction.msstate.edu/ua-photo-collection/3832/thumbnail.jp

A renormalization group study of a class of reaction-diffusion model, with particles input

We study a class of reaction-diffusion model extrapolating continuously between the pure coagulation-diffusion case ($A+A\to A$) and the pure annihilation-diffusion one ($A+A\to\emptyset$) with particles input ($\emptyset\to A$) at a rate $J$. For dimension $d\leq 2$, the dynamics strongly depends on the fluctuations while, for $d >2$, the behaviour is mean-field like. The models are mapped onto a field theory which properties are studied in a renormalization group approach. Simple relations are found between the time-dependent correlation functions of the different models of the class. For the pure coagulation-diffusion model the time-dependent density is found to be of the form $c(t,J,D) = (J/D)^{1/\delta}{\cal F}[(J/D)^{\Delta} Dt]$, where $D$ is the diffusion constant. The critical exponent $\delta$ and $\Delta$ are computed to all orders in $\epsilon=2-d$, where $d$ is the dimension of the system, while the scaling function $\cal F$ is computed to second order in $\epsilon$. For the one-dimensional case an exact analytical solution is provided which predictions are compared with the results of the renormalization group approach for $\epsilon=1$.Comment: Ten pages, using Latex and IOP macro. Two latex figures. Submitted to Journal of Physics A. Also available at http://mykonos.unige.ch/~rey/publi.htm