11 research outputs found

    What is the effect of subepithelial lesions of the esophagus on esophageal motility?

    No full text
    © 2022 European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. All rights reserved.OBJECTIVE: Esophageal motility is regulated both by coordinated stimulation and inhibition of the circular and longitudinal muscle layers of the esophagus. Although there are many diseases known to have an effect on esophageal motility, the effect of subepithelial lesions (SELs) of the esophagus on esophageal motility, which is often detected incidentally, remains still unclear. The aim of this study is to reveal the effect of SELs of the esophagus on esophageal motility evaluating it by high-resolution manometry (HRM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 32 patients with SELs in the esophagus and 12 healthy individuals were included. All patients and controls included in the study underwent HRM using a Unisensor UniTip High Resolution catheter (Laborie, Amsterdam, Netherlands) and endosonographic examination. RESULTS: The mean age was 52.60±15.56 years (range: 23-79) and the average body mass index (BMI) was 26.63±4.71 kg/m2. Gender, height, weight, and BMI measurements, smoking status, alcohol use, and DM status did not statistically differ significantly between the groups (p>0.05). Of 32 patients with SELs, 65.6% (n=21) had lesions originating in the muscularis propria, while 34.4% had lesions originating in the submucosa. The rate of abnormal motility both in the supine and in upright positions of patients with SELs was found to be significantly higher than in the control group (p=0.001, p2 cm), the probability of abnormal HRM results increased. CONCLUSIONS: SELs of the esophagus have pathological effects on esophageal motility, mainly ineffective esophageal motility disorder

    LID - 10.1007/s11255-020-02690-w [doi]

    No full text
    PURPOSE: Hematuria is one of the most common laboratory findings in nephrology practice. To date, there is no enough data regarding the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of primary glomerular disease (PGD) patients with hematuria in our country. METHODS: Data were obtained from national multicenter (47 centers) data entered into the Turkish Society of Nephrology Glomerular Diseases (TSN-GOLD) database between May 2009 and June 2019. The data of all PGD patients over the age of 16 years who were diagnosed with renal biopsy and had hematuria data were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, laboratory and biopsy findings were also recorded. RESULTS: Data of 3394 PGD patients were included in the study. While 1699 (50.1%) patients had hematuria, 1695 (49.9%) patients did not have hematuria. Patients with hematuria had statistically higher systolic blood pressure, serum blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, albumin, levels and urine pyuria. However, these patients had statistically lower age, body mass index, presence of hypertension and diabetes, eGFR, 24-h proteinuria, serum total, HDL and LDL cholesterol, and C3 levels when compared with patients without hematuria. Hematuria was present 609 of 1733 patients (35.8%) among the patients presenting with nephrotic syndrome, while it was presented in 1090 of 1661 (64.2%) patients in non-nephrotics (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This is the first multicenter national report regarding the demographic and histopathologic data of PGD patients with or without hematuria. Hematuria, a feature of nephritic syndrome, was found at a higher than expected in the PGDs presenting with nephrotic syndrome in our national database

    in Turkey: the data from TSN-GOLD Working Group

    No full text
    Purpose Hematuria is one of the most common laboratory findings in nephrology practice. To date, there is no enough data regarding the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of primary glomerular disease (PGD) patients with hematuria in our country. Methods Data were obtained from national multicenter (47 centers) data entered into the Turkish Society of Nephrology Glomerular Diseases (TSN-GOLD) database between May 2009 and June 2019. The data of all PGD patients over the age of 16 years who were diagnosed with renal biopsy and had hematuria data were included in the study. Demographic characteristics, laboratory and biopsy findings were also recorded. Results Data of 3394 PGD patients were included in the study. While 1699 (50.1%) patients had hematuria, 1695 (49.9%) patients did not have hematuria. Patients with hematuria had statistically higher systolic blood pressure, serum blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, albumin, levels and urine pyuria. However, these patients had statistically lower age, body mass index, presence of hypertension and diabetes, eGFR, 24-h proteinuria, serum total, HDL and LDL cholesterol, and C3 levels when compared with patients without hematuria. Hematuria was present 609 of 1733 patients (35.8%) among the patients presenting with nephrotic syndrome, while it was presented in 1090 of 1661 (64.2%) patients in non-nephrotics (p < 0.001). Conclusion This is the first multicenter national report regarding the demographic and histopathologic data of PGD patients with or without hematuria. Hematuria, a feature of nephritic syndrome, was found at a higher than expected in the PGDs presenting with nephrotic syndrome in our national database.C1 [Sumnu, Abdullah] Medipol Univ, Med Fac, Dept Nephrol, Medipol Mega Hastanesi, Goztepe Mahallesi Metin Sk 4, Istanbul, Turkey.[Turkmen, Kultigin] Necmettin Erbakan Univ, Meram Med Fac, Nephrol, Konya, Turkey.[Cebeci, Egemen; Uzun, Sami; Ozturk, Savas] Haseki Training & Res Hosp, Nephrol, Istanbul, Turkey.[Turkmen, Aydin] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Med Fac, Nephrol, Istanbul, Turkey.[Eren, Necmi; Ergul, Metin] Kocaeli Univ, Nephrol Med Fac, Kocaeli, Turkey.[Seyahi, Nurhan; Dincer, Mevlut Tamer] Istanbul Univ, Cerrahpasa Med Fac, Nephrol, Istanbul, Turkey.[Oruc, Aysegul; Gullulu, Mustafa] Uludag Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Bursa, Turkey.[Dede, Fatih; Piskinpasa, Serhan] Ankara Numune Training & Res Hosp, Nephrol, Ankara, Turkey.[Derici, Ulver; Akcay, Omer Faruk] Gazi Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Ankara, Turkey.[Basturk, Taner; Unsal, Abdulkadir] Hamidiye Sisli Etfal Training & Res Hosp, Nephrol, Istanbul, Turkey.[Sahin, Garip] Eskisehir Osmangazi Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Eskisehir, Turkey.[Sipahioglu, Murat; Koyuncu, Sumeyra] Erciyes Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Kayseri, Turkey.[Sahin, Gulizar Manga; Gok, Mahmut] Sultan Abdulhamit Han Res & Training Hosp, Nephrol, Istanbul, Turkey.[Tatar, Erhan] Bozyaka Training & Res Hosp, Nephrol, Izmir, Turkey.[Dursun, Belda] Pamukkale Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Denizli, Turkey.[Sipahi, Savas] Sakarya Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Sakarya, Turkey.[Yilmaz, Murvet] Bakirkoy Sadi Konuk Training & Res Hosp, Nephrol, Istanbul, Turkey.[Suleymanlar, Gultekin] Akdeniz Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Antalya, Turkey.[Ulu, Sena] Afyon Kocatepe Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Afyon, Turkey.[Gungor, Ozkan] Sutcu Imam Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Kahramanmaras, Turkey.[Kutlay, Sim] Ankara Univ, Ibni Sina Hosp, Med Fac, Nephrol, Ankara, Turkey.[Bahcebasi, Zerrin Bicik] Dr Lutfi Kirdar Kartal Training & Res Hosp, Nephrol, Istanbul, Turkey.[Sahin, Idris] Inonu Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Malatya, Turkey.[Kurultak, Ilhan] Trakya Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Edirne, Turkey.[Sevinc, Can] Ataturk Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Erzurum, Turkey.[Yilmaz, Zulfikar] Dicle Univ, Diyarbakir, Turkey.[Kazancioglu, Rumeyza Turan] Bezmialem Vakif Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Istanbul, Turkey.[Cavdar, Caner] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Izmir, Turkey.[Candan, Ferhan] Cumhuriyet Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Sivas, Turkey.[Aydin, Zeki] Darica Farabi Training & Res Hosp, Nephrol, Kocaeli, Turkey.[Oygar, Deren] Burhan Nalbantoglu State Hosp, Nephrol, Nicosia, Cyprus.[Gul, Bulent] Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training & Res Hosp, Nephrol, Bursa, Turkey.[Altun, Bulent] Hacettepe Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Ankara, Turkey.[Paydas, Saime] Cukurova Univ, Med Fac, Nephrol, Adana, Turkey.[Istemihan, Zulal] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Med Fac, Internal Med, Istanbul, Turkey

    Association between XRCC3 Thr241Met polymorphism and laryngeal cancer susceptibility in Turkish population

    No full text
    WOS: 000364507300026PubMed ID: 25510985DNA repair systems are essential for normal cell function. Genetic alterations in the DNA repair genes such as X-ray repair cross-complementing group 3 (XRCC3), can cause a change in protein activity which results in cancer susceptibility. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of XRCC3 Thr241Met single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), smoking and alcohol consumption with the risk of laryngeal cancer in Turkish population. The frequencies of Thr241Met SNP were studied in 58 laryngeal cancer cases (SSC) and 67 healthy individuals. Genomic DNA was isolated from peripheral blood samples of both controls and laryngeal cancer cases. Thr241Met SNP was genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. The genotype and allele frequencies of Thr241Met polymorphism were not statistically significant between the laryngeal cancer and control groups. Carrying mutant allele was not associated with the risk of laryngeal cancer. On the other hand, smoking and chronic alcohol consumption were associated with the risk of laryngeal cancer but there is no association between Thr241Met, smoking and alcohol consumption in laryngeal cancer cases. These results indicate that Thr241Met polymorphism was not associated with the development of laryngeal cancer in Turkish population. However, it should be kept in mind that the association of a polymorphism with cancer susceptibility can differ due to several factors such as cancer type, selection criteria, ethnic differences and size of the studied population.Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital BAP FoundationDiskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training & Research Hospital [41/3]This study was supported by Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital BAP Foundation (# 41/3). The authors of this study declare that they have no conflict of interest
    corecore