THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS OF SYNTHESIS GAS AND HIGHER HYDROCARBONS PRODUCTION FROM METHANE

This chapter focused on thermodynamic chemical equilibrium analysis using method of direct minimization of Gibbs free energy for all possible methane reactions with oxygen (partial oxidation of methane), carbon dioxide (CO2 reforming of methane), steam (steam reforming of methane), and autothermal reforming. Effects of feed ratios (methane to oxygen, carbon dioxide, and/or steam feed ratio), reaction temperature, and system pressure on equilibrium composition, conversion, and yield were studied. In addition, operating regions of carbon and no carbon formation were also considered at various reaction temperatures and feed ratios in the equilibrium system. It was found that the reaction temperature above 1100 K and CH4/CO2 ratio unity were favorable for synthesis gas production for methane – carbon dioxide reaction. The Carbon Dioxide Oxidative Coupling of Methane reaction to produce ethane and ethylene is less favorable thermodynamically. In addition, steam reforming of methane is the most suitable for hydrogen production from methane with low coke formation from thermodynamic point of view

Konsep Fundamental Teknik Pembakaran - 1

Konsep Fundamental Teknik Pembakaran -

Copyright Transfer Agreement

<p><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.9767/bcrec.6.1.927.0" target="_self">doi:10.9767/bcrec.6.1.927.0</a></p><p> </p

Preface, BCREC Vol. 11 No. 1 Year 2016

DOI: 10.9767/bcrec.11.1.441.v-vi

Corrigendum / Erratum / Retraction

RETRACTION TO:Dhal, G.C., Dey, S., Prasad, R., Mohan, D. (2017). Simultaneous Elimination of Soot and NOX through Silver-Barium Based Catalytic Materials. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis, 12 (1): 71-80 (doi:10.9767/bcrec.12.1.647.71-80)This article has been retracted by Publisher based on the following reason:Letter to Editor from Prof. James J. Spivey (Department of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana State University) who reported that a comparison of this paper with a previously paper published in Catalysis Today (258 (2015) 405-415, doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2015.02.024) shows significant duplication according to analysis by iThenticate shows 73% similarity, which is far more than acceptable. The authors have plagiarized part of the paper that had already published in [Catalysis Today (258 (2015) 405-415, doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2015.02.024)]. Based on clarification via email, Authors of the above paper have admitted their plagiarism to the previously published paper by Catalysis Today.Editor of Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis acknowledged Prof. James J. Spivey due to the valuable Letter to Editor.One of the conditions of submission of a paper for publication in this journal is that authors declare explicitly that their work is original and has not appeared in a publication elsewhere. Re-use of any data should be appropriately cited. As such this article represents a severe abuse of the scientific publishing system. The scientific community takes a very strong view on this matter and apologies are offered to readers of the journal that this was not detected during the submission process. 

Preface

Prefac