Effects of Age, Gender, Obesity, and Diabetes on the Efficacy and Safety of the Selective A(2A) Agonist Regadenoson Versus Adenosine in Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Integrated ADVANCE-MPI Trial Results

ObjectivesTo compare the effects of age, gender, body mass index, and diabetes on the safety and efficacy of regadenoson stress myocardial perfusion imaging, and to assess the noninferiority of regadenoson to adenosine for the detection of reversible myocardial perfusion defects.BackgroundPrevious reports have shown that a fixed unit bolus of regadenoson is safe and noninferior to adenosine for the detection of reversible perfusion defects by radionuclide imaging.MethodsUsing a database of 2,015 patients, we evaluated the effects of age, gender, body mass index, and diabetes on the safety and efficacy of regadenoson compared to adenosine.ResultsFor detection of ischemia relative to adenosine, noninferiority was demonstrated for all patients (agreement rate difference 0%, 95% CI −6.2% to +6.8%). The average agreement rate between adenosine-adenosine and adenosine-regadenoson were 0.62 ± 0.03 and 0.63 ± 0.02. Detection of ischemia was also comparable in specific subgroups. Agreement was less for both agents in women versus men with moderate and large areas of ischemia. Compared to adenosine, regadenoson had a lower combined symptom score and less chest pain, flushing, and throat, neck, or jaw pain, but more headache and gastrointestinal discomfort. This was true in nearly all subgroups. Regadenoson patients reported feeling more comfortable (1.7 ± .02 vs. 1.9 ± 0.03, p < 0.001). Based on the overall tolerability score, women felt less comfortable than men with both stress agents. Image quality was rated good or excellent in 92% for both agents.ConclusionsRegadenoson can be safely administered as a fixed unit bolus and is as efficacious as adenosine in detecting ischemia regardless of age, gender, body mass index, and diabetes. Regadenoson is better tolerated overall and across various subgroups

The Accuracy of the Electrocardiogram during Exercise Stress Test Based on Heart Size

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have shown that the exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) is less accurate for predicting ischemia, especially in women, and there is additional evidence to suggest that heart size may affect its diagnostic accuracy. HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the exercise ECG based on heart size. METHODS: We evaluated 1,011 consecutive patients who were referred for an exercise nuclear stress test. Patients were divided into two groups: small heart size defined as left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV) <65 mL (Group A) and normal heart size defined as LVEDV ≥65 mL (Group B) and associations between ECG outcome (false positive vs. no false positive) and heart size (small vs. normal) were analyzed using the Chi square test for independence, with a Yates continuity correction. LVEDV calculations were performed via a computer-processing algorithm. SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging was used as the gold standard for the presence of coronary artery disease (CAD). RESULTS: Small heart size was found in 142 patients, 123 female and 19 male patients. There was a significant association between ECG outcome and heart size (χ(2) = 4.7, p = 0.03), where smaller hearts were associated with a significantly greater number of false positives. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a possible explanation for the poor diagnostic accuracy of exercise stress testing, especially in women, as the overwhelming majority of patients with small heart size were women

A cost-effective sestamibi protocol in the managed health care era.

BACKGROUND: In the managed health care era a need exists to lower the cost of diagnostic tests for coronary artery disease. One possible approach is to eliminate the rest study in the conventional stress-rest perfusion imaging protocol with single photon emission computed tomography. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine the frequency with which single stress single photon emission computed tomography acquisition can be used to diagnose disease in normal patients compared with dual stress-rest protocol. STUDY GROUP: Two hundred patients without history of myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, valvular disease, dilated cardiomyopathy, or left bundle branch block undergoing 1-day (n = 86) or 2-day (n = 114) stress-rest sestamibi imaging were studied. The stress was exercise in 147 patients and pharmacologic in 53 patients. RESULTS: On the basis of the stress study, 112 patients had normal images, and 88 patients had abnormal images. On the basis of the combined stress-rest images, 131 patients had normal images, and 69 patients had abnormal images (agreement 85%, kappa 0.68 +/- 0.05). Only 6 (5%) of the 112 patients with normal images based on the stress images were considered to have abnormal images by the combined stress and rest images. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with normal stress images elimination of the rest study rarely alters interpretation. Rest studies are most useful in patients with abnormal or equivocal stress images. Such selective elimination of the rest studies may decrease the cost of nuclear procedures and should be considered in the current managed care health system