BMQ

BMQ: Boston Medical Quarterly was published from 1950-1966 by the Boston University School of Medicine and the Massachusetts Memorial Hospitals. Pages 49-52, v17n2, provided courtesy of Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center

Fractionating Human Intelligence

What makes one person more intellectually able than another? Can the entire distribution of human intelligence be accounted for by just one general factor? Is intelligence supported by a single neural system? Here, we provide a perspective on human intelligence that takes into account how general abilities or ‘‘factors’’ reflect the functional organiza- tion of the brain. By comparing factor models of individual differences in performance with factor models of brain functional organization, we demon- strate that different components of intelligence have their analogs in distinct brain networks. Using simulations based on neuroimaging data, we show that the higher-order factor ‘‘g’’ is accounted for by cognitive tasks corecruiting multiple networks. Finally, we confirm the independence of these com- ponents of intelligence by dissociating them using questionnaire variables. We propose that intelli- gence is an emergent property of anatomically distinct cognitive systems, each of which has its own capacity

Whole Brain Size and General Mental Ability: A Review

We review the literature on the relation between whole brain size and general mental ability (GMA) both within and between species. Among humans, in 28 samples using brain imaging techniques, the mean brain size/GMA correlation is 0.40 (N = 1,389; p < 10−10); in 59 samples using external head size measures it is 0.20 (N = 63,405; p < 10−10). In 6 samples using the method of correlated vectors to distill g, the general factor of mental ability, the mean r is 0.63. We also describe the brain size/GMA correlations with age, socioeconomic position, sex, and ancestral population groups, which also provide information about brain–behavior relationships. Finally, we examine brain size and mental ability from an evolutionary and behavior genetic perspective

Expression of the protease gene HF as a marker in rejecting allogeneic murine heart transplants.

Phenotypic characterization of the inflammatory infiltrate often provides very little information about the fate of a transplant. Therefore we decided to look for functional markers, characteristic for activated effector cells involved in the rejection of primarily vascularized MHC-mismatched heart transplants in mice. Infiltrating cells in the interstitium of eventually rejected allogeneic heart transplants were found to express the gene for the serine esterase HF (granzyme A) in high numbers already on day 2 following transplantation, whereas HF mRNA positive cells were absent, or only rarely found, in syngeneic nonrejecting transplants throughout the entire observation period of 10 days after transplantation. These findings could also become of importance for the prediction of the outcome of organ transplants in humans

A high proportion of T lymphocytes that infiltrate H-2-incompatible heart allografts in vivo express genes encoding cytotoxic cell-specific serine proteases, but do not express the MEL-14-defined lymph node homing receptor.

The role of cytotoxic cells in in vivo immune functions such as allograft rejection is unknown. To begin to assess the function of cytolytic cells in vivo we have begun with cytolytic cell-specific functional molecules: we have isolated and characterized cytolytic cell-specific cDNA clones from cytolytic T cell clones, both encoding distinct serine esterases. The HF gene encodes a trypsin-like enzyme while the C11 gene encodes an enzyme with likely specificity for acidic residues. Here we demonstrate, using in situ hybridization with RNA probe, that both genes are expressed selectively in a subset of T lymphocytes that have infiltrated cardiac allografts. The phenotype of these cells is consistent with the most frequent phenotype of active CTL raised in vitro: they are predominantly CD4-, CD8+, MEL-14- T cell blasts. Thus the expression of these genes, each of which encodes serine esterase found in killer cell granules in vitro, is a valid marker for these cells in vivo as well. The kinetics of their accumulation is consistent with, but not proof of, a putative role in allograft rejection. It is likely that HF and C11 gene expression will be of diagnostic value