Localization of xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein and replication protein A on damaged DNA in nucleotide excision repair

The interaction of xeroderma pigmentosum group A protein (XPA) and replication protein A (RPA) with damaged DNA in nucleotide excision repair (NER) was studied using model dsDNA and bubble-DNA structure with 5-{3-[6-(carboxyamido-fluoresceinyl)amidocapromoyl]allyl}-dUMP lesions in one strand and containing photoreactive 5-iodo-dUMP residues in defined positions. Interactions of XPA and RPA with damaged and undamaged DNA strands were investigated by DNA–protein photocrosslinking and gel shift analysis. XPA showed two maximums of crosslinking intensities located on the 5′-side from a lesion. RPA mainly localized on undamaged strand of damaged DNA duplex and damaged bubble-DNA structure. These results presented for the first time the direct evidence for the localization of XPA in the 5′-side of the lesion and suggested the key role of XPA orientation in conjunction with RPA binding to undamaged strand for the positioning of the NER preincision complex. The findings supported the mechanism of loading of the heterodimer consisting of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 and xeroderma pigmentosum group F proteins by XPA on the 5′-side from the lesion before damaged strand incision. Importantly, the proper orientation of XPA and RPA in the stage of preincision was achieved in the absence of TFIIH and XPG

Crosslinking of nucleotide excision repair proteins with DNA containing photoreactive damages

Photoreactive DNA duplexes mimicking substrates of nucleotide excision repair (NER) system were used to analyze the interaction of XPC-HR23B, RPA, and XPA with damaged DNA. Photoreactive groups in one strand of DNA duplex (arylazido-dCMP or 4-thio-dUMP) were combined with anthracenyl-dCMP residue at the opposite strand to analyze contacts of NER factors with damaged and undamaged strands. Crosslinking of XPC-HR23B complex with photoreactive 48-mers results in modification of XPC subunit. XPC-HR23B did not crosslink with DNA duplex bearing bulky residues in both strands while this modification does not prevent interaction of DNA with XPA. The data on crosslinking of XPA and RPA with photoreactive DNA duplexes containing bulky group in one of the strands are in favor of XPA preference to interact with the damaged strand and RPA preference for the undamaged strand. The results support the understanding and set the stage for dynamically oriented experiments of how the pre-incision complex is formed in the early stage of NER.clos

Crosslinking of the NER damage recognition proteins XPC-HR23B, XPA and RPA to photoreactive probes that mimic DNA damages

A new assay to probe the mechanism of mammalian nucleotide excision repair (NER) was developed. Photoreactive arylazido analogues of dNMP in DNA were shown to be substrates for the human NER system. Oligonucleotides carrying photoreactive "damages" were prepared using the multi-stage protocol including one-nucleotide gap filling by DNA polymerase beta using photoreactive dCTP or dUTP analogues followed by ligation of the resulting nick. Photoreactive 60-mers were annealed with single-stranded pBluescript II SK (+) and subsequently primer extension reactions were pet-formed. Incubation of HeLa extracts with the plasmids containing photoreactive moieties resulted in an excision pattern typical of NER. DNA duplexes containing photoreactive analogues were used to analyze the interaction of XPC-HR23B, RPA, and XPA with damaged DNA using the photocrosslinking assay. Crosslinking of the XPC-HR23B complex with photoreactive 60-mers resulted in modification of its XPC subunit. RPA crosslinked to ssDNA or mismatched dsDNA more efficiently than to dsDNA, whereas XPA did not show a preference for any of the DNA species. XPC and XPA photocrosslinking to DNA decreased in the presence of Mg2+ whereas RPA crosslinking to DNA was not sensitive to this cofactor. Our data establish a photocrosslinking assay for the investigation of the damage recognition step in human nucleotide excision repair. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reservedclos