8 research outputs found

    Role of Adenosine in Pathogenesis of Syndrome X: Assessment With Coronary Hemodynamic Measurements and Thallium-201 Myocardial Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography

    Get PDF
    AbstractObjectives. This study was performed 1) to examine the role of adenosine in the pathogenesis of syndrome X in patients with this syndrome and abnormal results on myocardial scintigrams during exercise, and 2) to determine the susceptibility to myocardial ischemia in this subset of patients with syndrome X.Background. A role for adenosine in the pathogenesis of syndrome X has recently been postulated, but there are few clinical data supporting this hypothesis.Methods. Exercise thallium-201 myocardial scintigraphy after intravenous administration of aminophylline, an adenosine receptor blocking agent, or saline solution and adenosine thallium-201 scintigraphy were performed in 26 patients with syndrome X. Hemodynamic variables during exercise and perfusion defect size after aminophylline and saline infusions were compared. At cardiac catheterization, coronary hemodynamic variables during separate infusions of adenosine and dobutamine were also examined and were compared among patients with abnormal or normal scintigrams and 10 control subjects.Results. Perfusion abnormalities on exercise-thallium-201 scintigraphy occurred in 14 of 26 patients with syndrome X. Intravenous infusion of aminophylline suppressed the scintigraphic perfusion defect and prolonged the time to 1-mm ST segment depression in patients with syndrome X with abnormal exercise scintigrams. Intravenous infusion of adenosine induced a perfusion defect in the same myocardial area where the perfusion defect was observed at exercise in 7 of the 14 patients with syndrome X. At cardiac catheterization, patients with syndrome X with abnormal exercise scintigrams had lower coronary flow reserve and a greater frequency of myocardial lactate production and ST segment depression in response to the infusions of adenosine and dobutamine than did the other two groups. During adenosine infusion, great cardiac vein blood flow and oxygen content were significantly increased and myocardial oxygen consumption and lactate extraction were significantly reduced from baseline without a significant increase in rate-pressure product in this subset of patients with syndrome X.Conclusions. Patients with syndrome X with abnormal exercise scintigrams have high susceptibility to myocardial ischemia during exercise or pharmacologic stress tests, probably owing to reduced coronary flow reserve. A heterogeneous response to endogenous adenosine may contribute to scintigraphic perfusion abnormalities and myocardial ischemia during exercise in this subset of patients with syndrome X

    Nitric Oxide-Mediated Flow-Dependent Dilation Is Impaired in Coronary Arteries in Patients With Coronary Spastic Angina

    Get PDF
    AbstractObjectives. This study sought to examine whether flow-dependent dilation is impaired at the site of coronary artery spasm in patients with coronary spastic angina.Background. Physiologic stimuli such as exercise and exposure to cold have been shown to cause an increase in coronary blood flow, leading to flow-dependent dilation of coronary arteries in normal subjects, but cause coronary constriction in patients with coronary spastic angina.Methods. A maximal increase in blood flow was induced selectively in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) by infusion of adenosine through a Doppler flow catheter tip in the midportion of the LAD in 10 patients with coronary spastic angina, all with angiographically demonstrated spasm of the LAD, and in 11 control patients. Coronary artery diameter at the proximal site of the LAD (exposed to increased flow but not to adenosine) was measured by quantitative angiography.Results. Flow-dependent dilation of the proximal LAD was found to be less in spasm arteries than in control arteries. Infusion of NG-monomethyl-l-arginine (l-NMMA) in the proximal LAD suppressed flow-dependent dilation in control arteries but had no significant effect on spasm arteries. The dilator response to nitroglycerin was not impaired in spasm coronary arteries.Conclusions. Our results indicate that flow-dependent coronary dilation is impaired in spasm arteries, partly due to a deficiency in endothelial nitric oxide bioactivity, which in turn may contribute to the increase in coronary tone during physiologic stimuli in patients with coronary spastic angina

    Long-term safety and efficacy of benralizumab in patients with severe, uncontrolled asthma: 1-year results from the BORA phase 3 extension trial

    No full text
    International audienc

    Odanacatib for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis : Results of the LOFT multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial and LOFT Extension study

    No full text
    Background Odanacatib, a cathepsin K inhibitor, reduces bone resorption while maintaining bone formation. Previous work has shown that odanacatib increases bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of odanacatib to reduce fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Methods The Long-term Odanacatib Fracture Trial (LOFT) was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, event-driven study at 388 outpatient clinics in 40 countries. Eligible participants were women aged at least 65 years who were postmenopausal for 5 years or more, with a femoral neck or total hip bone mineral density T-score between −2·5 and −4·0 if no previous radiographic vertebral fracture, or between −1·5 and −4·0 with a previous vertebral fracture. Women with a previous hip fracture, more than one vertebral fracture, or a T-score of less than −4·0 at the total hip or femoral neck were not eligible unless they were unable or unwilling to use approved osteoporosis treatment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either oral odanacatib (50 mg once per week) or matching placebo. Randomisation was done using an interactive voice recognition system after stratification for previous radiographic vertebral fracture, and treatment was masked to study participants, investigators and their staff, and sponsor personnel. If the study completed before 5 years of double-blind treatment, consenting participants could enrol in a double-blind extension study (LOFT Extension), continuing their original treatment assignment for up to 5 years from randomisation. Primary endpoints were incidence of vertebral fractures as assessed using radiographs collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months, yearly, and at final study visit in participants for whom evaluable radiograph images were available at baseline and at least one other timepoint, and hip and non-vertebral fractures adjudicated as being a result of osteoporosis as assessed by clinical history and radiograph. Safety was assessed in participants who received at least one dose of study drug. The adjudicated cardiovascular safety endpoints were a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and new-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter. Individual cardiovascular endpoints and death were also assessed. LOFT and LOFT Extension are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (number NCT00529373) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT number 2007-002693-66). Findings Between Sept 14, 2007, and Nov 17, 2009, we randomly assigned 16 071 evaluable patients to treatment: 8043 to odanacatib and 8028 to placebo. After a median follow-up of 36·5 months (IQR 34·43–40·15) 4297 women assigned to odanacatib and 3960 assigned to placebo enrolled in LOFT Extension (total median follow-up 47·6 months, IQR 35·45–60·06). In LOFT, cumulative incidence of primary outcomes for odanacatib versus placebo were: radiographic vertebral fractures 3·7% (251/6770) versus 7·8% (542/6910), hazard ratio (HR) 0·46, 95% CI 0·40–0·53; hip fractures 0·8% (65/8043) versus 1·6% (125/8028), 0·53, 0·39–0·71; non-vertebral fractures 5·1% (412/8043) versus 6·7% (541/8028), 0·77, 0·68–0·87; all p<0·0001. Combined results from LOFT plus LOFT Extension for cumulative incidence of primary outcomes for odanacatib versus placebo were: radiographic vertebral fractures 4·9% (341/6909) versus 9·6% (675/7011), HR 0·48, 95% CI 0·42–0·55; hip fractures 1·1% (86/8043) versus 2·0% (162/8028), 0·52, 0·40–0·67; non-vertebral fractures 6·4% (512/8043) versus 8·4% (675/8028), 0·74, 0·66–0·83; all p<0·0001. In LOFT, the composite cardiovascular endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in 273 (3·4%) of 8043 patients in the odanacatib group versus 245 (3·1%) of 8028 in the placebo group (HR 1·12, 95% CI 0·95–1·34; p=0·18). New-onset atrial fibrillation or flutter occurred in 112 (1·4%) of 8043 patients in the odanacatib group versus 96 (1·2%) of 8028 in the placebo group (HR 1·18, 0·90–1·55; p=0·24). Odanacatib was associated with an increased risk of stroke (1·7% [136/8043] vs 1·3% [104/8028], HR 1·32, 1·02–1·70; p=0·034), but not myocardial infarction (0·7% [60/8043] vs 0·9% [74/8028], HR 0·82, 0·58–1·15; p=0·26). The HR for all-cause mortality was 1·13 (5·0% [401/8043] vs 4·4% [356/8028], 0·98–1·30; p=0·10). When data from LOFT Extension were included, the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke occurred in significantly more patients in the odanacatib group than in the placebo group (401 [5·0%] of 8043 vs 343 [4·3%] of 8028, HR 1·17, 1·02–1·36; p=0·029, as did stroke (2·3% [187/8043] vs 1·7% [137/8028], HR 1·37, 1·10–1·71; p=0·0051). Interpretation Odanacatib reduced the risk of fracture, but was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, specifically stroke, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Based on the overall balance between benefit and risk, the study's sponsor decided that they would no longer pursue development of odanacatib for treatment of osteoporosis
    corecore