Starch biosynthetic genes and enzymes are expressed and active in the absence of starch accumulation in sugar beet tap-root

BACKGROUND: Starch is the predominant storage compound in underground plant tissues like roots and tubers. An exception is sugar beet tap-root (Beta vulgaris ssp altissima) which exclusively stores sucrose. The underlying mechanism behind this divergent storage accumulation in sugar beet is currently not fully known. From the general presence of starch in roots and tubers it could be speculated that the lack in sugar beet tap-roots would originate from deficiency in pathways leading to starch. Therefore with emphasis on starch accumulation, we studied tap-roots of sugar beet using parsnip (Pastinaca sativa) as a comparator. RESULTS: Metabolic and structural analyses of sugar beet tap-root confirmed sucrose as the exclusive storage component. No starch granules could be detected in tap-roots of sugar beet or the wild ancestor sea beet (Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima). Analyses of parsnip showed that the main storage component was starch but tap-root tissue was also found to contain significant levels of sugars. Surprisingly, activities of four main starch biosynthetic enzymes, phosphoglucomutase, ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase, starch synthase and starch branching enzyme, were similar in sugar beet and parsnip tap-roots. Transcriptional analysis confirmed expression of corresponding genes. Additionally, expression of genes involved in starch accumulation such as for plastidial hexose transportation and starch tuning functions could be determined in tap-roots of both plant species. Conclusion: Considering underground storage organs, sugar beet tap-root upholds a unique property in exclusively storing sucrose. Lack of starch also in the ancestor sea beet indicates an evolved trait of biological importance. Our findings in this study show that gene expression and enzymatic activity of main starch biosynthetic functions are present in sugar beet tap-root during storage accumulation. In view of this, the complete lack of starch in sugar beet tap-roots is enigmatic

p38 MAP kinase negatively regulates endothelial cell survival, proliferation, and differentiation in FGF-2–stimulated angiogenesis

The p38 mitogen–activated protein kinase (p38) is activated in response to environmental stress and inflammatory cytokines. Although several growth factors, including fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-2, mediate activation of p38, the consequences for growth factor–dependent cellular functions have not been well defined. We investigated the role of p38 activation in FGF-2–induced angiogenesis. In collagen gel cultures, bovine capillary endothelial cells formed tubular growth-arrested structures in response to FGF-2. In these collagen gel cultures, p38 activation was induced more potently by FGF-2 treatment compared with that in proliferating cultures. Treatment with the p38 inhibitor SB202190 enhanced FGF-2–induced tubular morphogenesis by decreasing apoptosis, increasing DNA synthesis and cell proliferation, and enhancing the kinetics of cell differentiation including increased expression of the Notch ligand Jagged1. Overexpression of dominant negative mutants of the p38-activating kinases MKK3 and MKK6 also supported FGF-2–induced tubular morphogenesis. Sustained activation of p38 by FGF-2 was identified in vascular endothelial cells in vivo in the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). SB202190 treatment enhanced FGF-2–induced neovascularization in the CAM, but the vessels displayed abnormal features indicative of hyperplasia of endothelial cells. These results implicate p38 in organization of new vessels and suggest that p38 is an essential regulator of FGF-2–driven angiogenesis

Analysis of Gene Expression Using Gene Sets Discriminates Cancer Patients with and without Late Radiation Toxicity

BACKGROUND: Radiation is an effective anti-cancer therapy but leads to severe late radiation toxicity in 5%–10% of patients. Assuming that genetic susceptibility impacts this risk, we hypothesized that the cellular response of normal tissue to X-rays could discriminate patients with and without late radiation toxicity. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Prostate carcinoma patients without evidence of cancer 2 y after curative radiotherapy were recruited in the study. Blood samples of 21 patients with severe late complications from radiation and 17 patients without symptoms were collected. Stimulated peripheral lymphocytes were mock-irradiated or irradiated with 2-Gy X-rays. The 24-h radiation response was analyzed by gene expression profiling and used for classification. Classification was performed either on the expression of separate genes or, to augment the classification power, on gene sets consisting of genes grouped together based on function or cellular colocalization. X-ray irradiation altered the expression of radio-responsive genes in both groups. This response was variable across individuals, and the expression of the most significant radio-responsive genes was unlinked to radiation toxicity. The classifier based on the radiation response of separate genes correctly classified 63% of the patients. The classifier based on affected gene sets improved correct classification to 86%, although on the individual level only 21/38 (55%) patients were classified with high certainty. The majority of the discriminative genes and gene sets belonged to the ubiquitin, apoptosis, and stress signaling networks. The apoptotic response appeared more pronounced in patients that did not develop toxicity. In an independent set of 12 patients, the toxicity status of eight was predicted correctly by the gene set classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Gene expression profiling succeeded to some extent in discriminating groups of patients with and without severe late radiotherapy toxicity. Moreover, the discriminative power was enhanced by assessment of functionally or structurally related gene sets. While prediction of individual response requires improvement, this study is a step forward in predicting susceptibility to late radiation toxicity

High efficacy of hypofractionated proton therapy with 4 fractions of 5 Gy as a boost to 50 Gy photon therapy for localized prostate cancer

Purpose: We report the outcome of hypofractionated proton boost as an alternative to high dose-rate brachytherapy boost, aimed at an equivalent dose exceeding 86 Gy in 2 Gy fractions, for patients with localized prostate cancer and all risk groups. Methods: Proton boost of 20 Gy given in 4 daily fractions to the prostate was followed after a one-week rest by photon therapy to 50 Gy in 2 Gy fractions. Outcomes are presented per risk group according to both NCCN and ISUP classifications. Advanced imaging was performed for adequate staging, and at an early stage of rising PSA, to identify the relapse site. Endpoints were PSA relapse-free-, locoregional relapse-free-, and distant metastasis-free- survival. Prostate cancer-specific-, metastasis-free-, and overall survival were also estimated. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were based on patients' questionnaires and physicians' records. Results: We treated 531 patients between 2002 and 2015; 504 had localized disease. The cohort included 180 patients with T3/T4 disease (36%). The majority of the 50% with high-/very high-risk disease received ADT, 9-24 months; 92 had adjuvant pelvic node treatment. Median follow-up was 113 months (43-193). For low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk patients, the 5-year PSA relapse-free survival was 100%, 94%, 82%, and 72%, respectively. Prolonged ADT improved biochemical control and nodal treatment regional control. The NCCN classification had higher predictive discrimination than the ISUP classification. The 5-year prevalence grade 3+ was 2% for GU and 0% for GI toxicity in pre-treatment symptom-free patients, and not worsened by nodal treatment. Conclusion: Dose escalation with hypofractionated proton boost was as effective as reported with high dose-rate brachytherapy boost, and the GU and GI toxicity profile was very similar. The proton boost was also appropriate for patients with larger prostate volume, higher T-stage, and high-risk disease encompassing elective regional node photon therapy.

Low-dose hypersensitivity: current status and possible mechanisms

Purpose: To retain cell viability, mammalian cells can increase damage repair in response to excessive radiation-induced injury. The adaptive response to small radiation doses is an example of this induced resistance and has been studied for many years, particularly in human lymphocytes. This review focuses on another manifestation of actively increased resistance that is of potential interest for developing improved radiotherapy, specifically the phenomenon in which cells die from excessive sensitivity to small single doses of ionizing radiation but remain more resistant (per unit dose) to larger single doses. In this paper, we propose possible mechanisms to explain this phenomenon based on our data accumulated over the last decade and a review of the literature. Conclusion: Typically, most cell lines exhibit hyper-radiosensitivity (HRS) to very low radiation doses (<10 cGy) that is not predicted by back-extrapolating the cell survival response from higher doses. As the dose is increased above about 30 cGy, there is increased radioresistance (IRR) until at doses beyond about 1 Gy, radioresistance is maximal, and the cell survival follows the usual downward-bending curve with increasing dose. The precise operational and activational mechanism of the process is still unclear, but we propose two hypotheses. The greater amount of injury produced by larger doses either ( 1) is above a putative damage-sensing threshold for triggering faster or more efficient DNA repair or ( 2) causes changes in DNA structure or organization that facilitates constitutive repair. In both scenarios, this enhanced repair ability is decreased again on a similar time scale to the rate of removal of DNA damage

Hypofractionated Proton Boost Combined with External Beam Radiotherapy for Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer

Proton boost of 20 Gy in daily 5 Gy fractions followed by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) of 50 Gy in daily 2 Gy fractions were given to 278 patients with prostate cancer with T1b to T4N0M0 disease. Fifty-three percent of the patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (N-ADT). The medium followup was 57 months. The 5-year PSA progression-free survival was 100%, 95%, and 74% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients, respectively. The toxicity evaluation was supported by a patient-reported questionnaire before every consultant visit. Cumulative probability and actuarial prevalence of genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities are presented according to the RTOG classification. N-ADT did not influence curability. Mild pretreatment GU-symptoms were found to be a strong predictive factor for GU-toxicity attributable to treatment. The actuarial prevalence declined over 3 to 5 years for both GU and GI toxicities, indicating slow resolution of epithelial damage to the genitourinary and gastrointestinal tract. Bladder toxicities rather than gastrointestinal toxicities seem to be dose limiting. More than 5-year followup is necessary to reveal any sign of true progressive late side effects of the given treatment. Hypofractionated proton-boost combined with EBRT is associated with excellent curability of localized PC and acceptable frequencies of treatment toxicity

Cell Senescence in Myxoid/Round Cell Liposarcoma

Myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MLS/RCLS) is the second most common liposarcoma type and characterized by the fusion oncogenes FUS-DDIT3 or EWSR1-DDIT3. Previous analysis of cell cycle regulatory proteins revealed a prominent expression of G1-cyclins, cyclin dependent kinases, and their inhibitors but very few cells progressing through the G1/S boundary. Here, we extend the investigation to proteins involved in cell senescence in an immunohistochemistry based study of 17 MLS/RCLS cases. Large subpopulations of tumor cells expressed the RBL2 pocket protein and senescence associated heterochromatin 1γ and IL8 receptor β. We conclude that MLS/RCLS tissues contain major populations of senescent tumor cells and this may explain the slow growth rate of this tumor type