10 research outputs found

    Impacts of climate change on river discharge in the northern Tien Shan: Results from long-term observations and modelling

    Get PDF
    This paper presents preliminary results of investigation of the observed and projected changes in discharge of the snow- and glacier-nourished rivers of the Balkhash-Alakol basin, Kazakhstan using the long-term homogeneous records and climate projections from an ensemble of climate simulations. Positive trends in discharge were registered at most sites between the 1950s and 2010s. An increase in discharge was observed at all sites between May and October in 2000 – 2013 in comparison with the previous decades which was particularly strong in July-August at the rivers with a high proportion of glacierized area. This positive trend in discharge appears to be driven primarily by an increase in temperature. Results for four climate scenarios with spatial resolution of 25 km are presented. These scenarios were generated using regional climate model PRECIS driven by HadGEM GCM for RCP 2.6 and RCP 8.5 scenarios, HadCM3Q0 and ECHAM5 GCM for A1B scenario. While all climate experiments project increase in temperature, precipitation projections vary between models, seasons and spatially. HBV-ETH model was used to simulate the observed and future discharge for the Ulken and Kishi Almatinka rivers using climate projections from PRECIS-HadCM3Q0 simulation for A1B scenario. The results show that peak flow has already been reached at both rivers and is likely to continue for the next 10-15 years. A small decrease of 7-10% in annual discharge is projected for the Ulken and Kishi Almatinka for the 2025-2044 period increasing thereafter and the projected decline in discharge is more significant in summer

    Emptying Water Towers? Impacts of Future Climate and Glacier Change on River Discharge in the Northern Tien Shan, Central Asia

    Get PDF
    Impacts of projected climate and glacier change on river discharge in five glacierized catchments in the northern Tien Shan, Kazakhstan are investigated using a conceptual hydrological model HBV‐ETH. Regional climate model PRECIS driven by four different GCM‐scenario combinations (HadGEM2.6, HadGEM8.5, A1B using HadCM3Q0 and ECHAM5) is used to develop climate projections. Future changes in glaciation are assessed using the Blatter–Pattyn type higherorder 3D coupled ice flow and mass balance model. All climate scenarios show statistically significant warming in the 21st Century. Neither projects statistically significant change in annual precipitation although HadGEM and HadCM3Q0‐driven scenarios show 20–37% reduction in July–August precipitation in 2076–2095 in comparison with 1980–2005. Glaciers are projected to retreat rapidly until the 2050s and stabilize afterwards except under the HadGEM8.5 scenario where retreat continues. Glaciers are projected to lose 38–50% of their volume and 34–39% of their area. Total river discharge in July–August, is projected to decline in catchments with low (2–4%) glacierization by 20–37%. In catchments with high glacierization (16% and over), no significant changes in summer discharge are expected while spring discharge is projected to increase. In catchments with medium glacierization (10–12%), summer discharge is expected to decline under the less aggressive scenarios while flow is sustained under the most aggressive HadGEM8.5 scenario, which generates stronger melt

    Boost glacier monitoring

    No full text
    Glacier-mass changes are a reliable indicator of climate change. On behalf of the worldwide network of glacier observers, we urge parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to boost international cooperation in monitoring these changes, and to include the results in the Paris agreement’s global stocktake. Since 1960, glaciers have lost more than 9,000 gigatonnes of ice worldwide — the equivalent of a 20-metre-thick layer with the area of Spain. This melting alone — as distinct from that of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets — has raised global sea level by almost 3 centimetres, contributing 25–30% of the total rise (M. Zemp et al. Nature 568, 382–386; 2019). The present rate of melting is unprecedented. Several mountain ranges are likely to lose most of their glaciers this century. And we face the loss of almost all glaciers by 2300 (B. Marzeion et al. Cryosph. 6, 1295–1322; 2012). Glacier shrinkage will severely affect freshwater availability and increase the risk of local geohazards. Global sea-level rise will result in the displacement of millions of people in coastal regions and in the loss of life, livelihoods and cultural- heritage sites. The systematic monitoring of glaciers has been internationally coordinated for 125 years. Continuing to do so will document progress in limiting climate change for current and future generations

    Historically unprecedented global glacier changes in the 1 early 21st century

    No full text
    Observations show that glaciers around the world are in retreat and losing mass. Internationally coordinated for over a century, glacier monitoring activities provide an unprecedented dataset of glacier observations from ground, air and space. Glacier studies generally select specific parts of these datasets to obtain optimal assessments of the mass-balance data relating to the impact that glaciers exercise on global sea-level fluctuations or on regional runoff. In this study we provide an overview and analysis of the main observational datasets compiled by the World Glacier Monitoring Service (WGMS). The dataset on glacier front variations (∌42 000 since 1600) delivers clear evidence that centennial glacier retreat is a global phenomenon. Intermittent readvance periods at regional and decadal scale are normally restricted to a subsample of glaciers and have not come close to achieving the maximum positions of the Little Ice Age (or Holocene). Glaciological and geodetic observations (∌5200 since 1850) show that the rates of early 21st-century mass loss are without precedent on a global scale, at least for the time period observed and probably also for recorded history, as indicated also in reconstructions from written and illustrated documents. This strong imbalance implies that glaciers in many regions will very likely suffer further ice loss, even if climate remains stable.Fil: Zemp, Michael. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Frey, Holger. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: GĂ€rtner-Roer, Isabelle. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Nussbaumer, Samuel U.. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Hoelzle, Martin. Universite de Fribourg; Suiza. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Paul, Frank. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Haeberli, Wilfried. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: Denzinger, Florian. Universitat Zurich; SuizaFil: AhlstrĂžm, Andreas P.. Geological Survey Of Denmark And Greenland; DinamarcaFil: Anderson, Brian. Victoria University Of Wellington; Nueva ZelandaFil: Bajracharya, Samjwal. International Centre For Integrated Mountain Development; NepalFil: Baroni, Carlo. UniversitĂ  degli Studi di Pisa; ItaliaFil: Braun, Ludwig N.. Bavarian Academy Of Sciences; AlemaniaFil: CĂ ceres, BolĂ­var E.. Instituto Nacional de MeteorologĂ­a E HidrologĂ­a; EcuadorFil: Casassa, Gino. Universidad de Magallanes; ChileFil: Cobos, Guillermo. Universidad PolitĂ©cnica de Valencia; EspañaFil: DĂ vila, Luzmila R.. Unidad de GlaciologĂ­a y Recursos HĂ­dricos; PerĂșFil: Delgado Granados, Hugo. Universidad Nacional AutĂłnoma de MĂ©xico; MĂ©xicoFil: Demuth, Michael N.. Natural Resources Canada; CanadĂĄFil: Espizua, Lydia Elena. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas. Centro CientĂ­fico TecnolĂłgico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de NivologĂ­a, GlaciologĂ­a y Ciencias Ambientales. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de NivologĂ­a, GlaciologĂ­a y Ciencias Ambientales. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de NivologĂ­a, GlaciologĂ­a y Ciencias Ambientales; ArgentinaFil: Fischer, Andrea. Osterreichische Akademie Der Wissenschaften; AustriaFil: Fujita, Koji. Nagoya University; JapĂłnFil: Gadek, Bogdan. University Of Silesia; PoloniaFil: Ghazanfar, Ali. Global Change Impact Studies Centre; PakistĂĄnFil: Hagen, Jon Ove. University of Oslo; NoruegaFil: Holmlund, Per. Stockholms Universitet; SueciaFil: Karimi, Neamat. Ministry of Energy; IrĂĄnFil: Li, Zhongqin. Chinese Academy of Sciences; RepĂșblica de ChinaFil: Pelto, Mauri. Nichols College; Estados UnidosFil: Pitte, Pedro Miguel. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas. Centro CientĂ­fico TecnolĂłgico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de NivologĂ­a, GlaciologĂ­a y Ciencias Ambientales. Provincia de Mendoza. Instituto Argentino de NivologĂ­a, GlaciologĂ­a y Ciencias Ambientales. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Instituto Argentino de NivologĂ­a, GlaciologĂ­a y Ciencias Ambientales; ArgentinaFil: Popovnin, Victor V.. Moscow State University; RusiaFil: Portocarrero, Cesar A.. Unidad de GlaciologĂ­a y Recursos HĂ­dricos; PerĂșFil: Prinz, Rainer. Universidad de Innsbruck; AustriaFil: Sangewar, Chandrashekhar V.. Geological Survey of India; IndiaFil: Severskiy, Igor. Institute Of Geography; KazajistĂĄnFil: Sigurdsson, Oddur. Icelandic Meteorological Offic; IslandiaFil: Soruco, Alvaro. Universidad Mayor de San AndrĂ©s; BoliviaFil: Usubaliev, Ryskul. Central Asian Institute For Applied Geosciences; KirguistĂĄnFil: Vincent, Christian. Laboratory of Glaciology and Environmental Geophysics; Franci
    corecore