Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Role of Biomarkers in Pancreatic Fluid Samples

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Most patients with PDAC present with symptomatic, surgically unresectable disease. Therefore, the establishment of strategies for the early detection is urgently needed. Molecular biomarkers might be useful in various phases of a strategy to identify high-risk individuals in the general population and to detect high-risk lesions during intense surveillance programs combined with imaging modalities. However, the low sensitivity and specificity of biomarkers currently available for PDAC, such as carbohydrate 19-9 (CA19-9), contribute to the late diagnosis of this deadly disease. Although almost all classes of biomarker assays have been studied, most of them are used in the context of symptomatic diseases. Compared to other body fluids, pancreatic juice and duodenal fluid are better sources of DNA, RNA, proteins, and exosomes derived from neoplastic cells and have the potential to increase the sensitivity/specificity of these biomarkers. The number of studies using duodenal fluid with or without secretin stimulation for DNA/protein marker tests have been increasing because of the less-invasiveness in comparison to pancreatic juice collection by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Genomic analyses have been very well-studied, and based on PDAC progression model, mutations detected in pancreatic juice/duodenal fluid seem to indicate the presence of microscopic precursors and high-grade dysplasia/invasive cancer. In addition to known proteins overexpressed both in precursors and PDACs, such as CEA and S100P, comprehensive proteomic analysis of pancreatic juice from patients with PDAC identified many proteins which were not previously described. A novel technique to isolate exosomes from pancreatic juice was recently invented and identification of exosomal microRNA’s 21 and 155 could be biomarkers for diagnosis of PDAC. Since many studies have explored biomarkers in fluid samples containing pancreatic juice and reported excellent diagnostic accuracy, we need to discuss how these biomarker assays can be validated and utilized in the strategy of early detection of PDAC

Unresectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma in the Remnant Pancreas Diagnosed during Every-6-Month Surveillance after Resection of Branch Duct Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm: A Case Report

Context There are few studies regarding the surveillance period and interval of resected or observed branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas in terms of early detection of concomitant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Despite a strict surveillance protocol, some patients are diagnosed with metastatic distinct ductal adenocarcinoma after resection of IPMN. Case report We herein report a patient with unresectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that developed in the remnant pancreas 18 months after resection of branch duct IPMN. Although the patient was surveyed every 6 months after the operation and imaging studies at 6 and 12 months postoperatively demonstrated no evidence of recurrence, invasive ductal adenocarcinoma with liver metastasis appeared 18 months after the operation. The patient subsequently underwent chemotherapy; however, he died 9 months after the diagnosis of metachronous pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Conclusions In some patients with branch duct IPMNs, 6-month surveillance seems to be insufficient to detect resectable concomitant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Therefore, identification of high-risk patients who require surveillance at shorter intervals is urgently needed.Image: Peroral pancreatoscopy reveals a fish egg-like appearance

GNASR201C Induces Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms in Mice That Express Activated KRAS by Inhibiting YAP1 Signaling

Background & aimsMutations at hotspots in GNAS, which encodes stimulatory G-protein, α subunits, are detected in approximately 60% of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas. We generated mice with KRAS-induced IPMNs that also express a constitutively active form of GNAS in pancreas and studied tumor development.MethodsWe generated p48-Cre; LSL-KrasG12D; Rosa26R-LSL-rtTA-TetO-GnasR201C mice (Kras;Gnas mice); pancreatic tissues of these mice express activated KRAS and also express a mutant form of GNAS (GNASR201C) upon doxycycline administration. Mice that were not given doxycycline were used as controls, and survival times were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Pancreata were collected at different time points after doxycycline administration and analyzed by histology. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs) were isolated from mice and used to generate cell lines, which were analyzed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, immunoblotting, immunohistochemistry, and colony formation and invasion assays. Full-length and mutant forms of yes-associated protein (YAP) were expressed in PDAC cells. IPMN specimens were obtained from 13 patients with IPMN undergoing surgery and analyzed by immunohistochemistry.ResultsAll Kras;Gnas mice developed pancreatic cystic lesions that resemble human IPMNs; the grade of epithelial dysplasia increased with time. None of the control mice developed cystic lesions. Approximately one third of Kras;Gnas mice developed PDACs at a median of 30 weeks after doxycycline administration, whereas 33% of control mice developed PDACs. Expression of GNASR201C did not accelerate the development of PDACs compared with control mice. However, the neoplasms observed in Kras;Gnas mice were more differentiated, and expressed more genes associated with ductal phenotypes, than in control mice. PDACs isolated from Kras;Gnas mice had activation of the Hippo pathway; in cells from these tumors, phosphorylated YAP1 was sequestered in the cytoplasm, and this was also observed in human IPMNs with GNAS mutations. Sequestration of YAP1 was not observed in PDAC cells from control mice.ConclusionsIn mice that express activated KRAS in the pancreas, we found expression of GNASR201C to cause development of more differentiated tumors, with gene expression pattern associated with the ductal phenotype. Expression of mutant GNAS caused phosphorylated YAP1 to be sequestered in the cytoplasm, altering tumor progression

Prognostic performance of microscopic size measurements in small invasive carcinomas arising in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas

Aims: Small invasive carcinomas arising in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas can present as multiple, small foci. In such cases, there is no clear optimal measurement method for determining the invasive size for tumour staging and prognostication. Methods: In all, 117 small invasive IPMNs (size of largest invasive component ≤2 cm) from seven institutions (2000-2016) were reviewed, and all individual foci of invasive carcinoma were measured. T stages (AJCC 8th edition) based on the largest single focus size (LS), average size of all foci (AS), and total sum of all foci (TS) were examined in association with clinicopathologic parameters and patient outcomes. Results: The cohort comprised IPMNs with invasive tubular-type (n = 82, 70%) and colloid-type (n = 35, 30%) carcinomas. The mean LS, AS, and TS were 0.86, 0.71, and 1.32 cm, respectively. Based on the LS, AS, and TS, respectively, 48, 65, and 39 cases were classified as pT1a; 22, 18, and 11 cases as pT1b; and 47, 34, and 50 cases as pT1c. Higher pT stages based on all measurements were significantly associated with small vessel, large vessel, and perineural invasion (P < 0.05). LS-, AS-, and TS-based pT stages were not significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) by univariate or multivariate analyses. However, among tubular-type carcinomas, higher LS-, AS-, and TS-based pT stages trended with lower RFS (based on 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates). All microscopic measurement methods were most predictive of RFS and OS using a 1.5-cm cutoff, with LS significantly associated with both RFS and OS by univariate and multivariate analysis. Conclusions: For invasive tubular-type carcinomas arising in IPMN, microscopic size-based AJCC pT stages were not significant predictors of patient outcomes. However, for LS, a size threshold of 1.5 cm was optimal for stratifying both RFS and OS. The AJCC 8th ed. may not be applicable for stratifying small invasive IPMNs with colloid-type histology that generally portend a more favourable prognosis