934oalienor engot ov7 randomized trial exploring weekly paclitaxel wp bevacizumab bev vs wp alone for patients with ovarian sex cord tumors sct in relapse

n/

132MO Molecular profiling of 991 prospectively recruited rare cancers patients in EUROPE: First results of ARCAGEN – an EORTC-SPECTA and EURACAN study

peer reviewe

Carboplatin-based doublet plus bevacizumab beyond progression versus carboplatin-based doublet alone in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer: a randomised, phase 3 trial

Background: Bevacizumab is approved in combination with chemotherapy for the treatment of ovarian cancer, either in first-line therapy or for patients with recurrent disease not previously treated with the same drug. We aimed to test the value of continuing bevacizumab beyond progression after first-line treatment with the same drug. Methods: In our open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done at 82 sites in four countries, we enrolled women (aged ≥18 years) who had previously received first-line platinum-based therapy including bevacizumab, and had recurrent (≥6 months since last platinum dose), International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage IIIB–IV ovarian cancer with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a carboplatin-based doublet intravenously (carboplatin area under the concentration curve [AUC] 5 on day 1 plus paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1, every 21 days; carboplatin AUC 4 on day 1 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, every 21 days; or carboplatin AUC 5 on day 1 plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 on day 1, every 28 days), or a carboplatin-based doublet plus bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenous every 14 days combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin–carboplatin, or 15 mg/kg every 21 days combined with gemcitabine–carboplatin or paclitaxel–carboplatin). Evaluable disease according to RECIST 1.1 guidelines was required before randomisation. Randomisation was done through the trial website with a minimisation procedure, stratified by centre, time of recurrence, performance status, and type of second-line chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01802749 and EudraCT 2012-004362-17. Findings: Between Dec 6, 2013, and Nov 11, 2016, 406 patients were recruited (203 [50%] assigned to the bevacizumab group and 203 [50%] to the standard chemotherapy group). 130 patients (64%) in the bevacizumab group and 131 (65%) in the standard chemotherapy group had progressed after receiving a last dose of platinum more than 12 months before, and 146 patients (72%) in the bevacizumab group and 147 (72%) in the standard chemotherapy group had progressed after completion of first-line bevacizumab maintenance. 161 participants (79%) progressed in the standard chemotherapy group, as did 143 (70%) in the bevacizumab group. Median progression-free survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 8·4–9·3) in the standard chemotherapy group and 11·8 months (10·8–12·9) in the bevacizumab group (hazard ratio 0·51, 95% CI 0·41–0·65; log-rank p<0·0001). Most common grade 3–4 adverse events were hypertension (20 [10%] in the standard chemotherapy group vs 58 (29%) in the bevacizumab group), neutrophil count decrease (81 [41%] vs 80 [40%]), and platelet count decrease (43 [22%] vs 61 [30%]). 68 patients (33%) died in the standard chemotherapy group and 79 (39%) died in the bevacizumab group; two deaths (1%) in the standard chemotherapy group and one death (<1%) in the bevacizumab group were deemed to be treatment-related. Interpretation: Continuing bevacizumab beyond progression combined with chemotherapy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer improves progression-free survival compared with standard chemotherapy alone and might be considered in clinical practice. Funding: Hoffmann–La Roche and Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro. © 2021 Elsevier Lt

L’année 2021 dans tous ses états : une synthèse digérée

International audience5548 Background: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death by gynecological cancer. Complete surgery remains one of the main prognostic factors. Laparoscopic exploration is mandatory to assess surgical resectability at diagnosis or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, there is no clinical or biological marker that can correctly predict resectability and may be able to avoid a second laparoscopic exploration for initially unresectable diseases. Our aim was to assess circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) value as a predictive non-invasive marker of evolution towards resectability for patients with epithelial ovarian cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy. Methods: We explored in this work one of the secondary objectives of the CIDOC study (NCT03302884). CIDOC is a multicenter prospective study aiming to explore ctDNA value as early marker of disease relapse after first-line treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer. Patients with mucinous histology or early stages not requiring chemotherapy are excluded. Plasma samples are collected at diagnosis, during neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and during follow-up. After DNA extraction, panel-based next generation sequencing is performed on both tumor samples and germline DNA, and somatic mutations of interest are selected for ctDNA monitoring. ctDNA analyses are conducted using droplet digital PCR (BioRad QX200) by measuring the variant allele fraction (VAF) of previously identified mutations. Results: This intermediary analysis has included 47 patients diagnosed between March 2017 and December 2019. Median age was 69 years old (48 – 84). Most of the patients had advanced disease (89.4% stage FIGO III or IV), serous histology (94.8%), and high grade tumor (92.3%). Most of the patients underwent complete interval cytoreductive surgery (76.3% vs 17.4% complete upfront surgery). Most of the tumors had TP53 mutations (85.1%), following by alterations involving DNA repair genes (38.3%). Median cell-free DNA concentration at baseline was 0.38 ng/µL (0 – 12.8). ctDNA was identified in 92.1% of patients at baseline with a median VAF of 1.84% (0 – 42.52%). ctDNA VAF was correlated to the peritoneal dissemination ( p= 0.039) assessed with the peritoneal cancer index. ctDNA clearance after preoperative chemotherapy tended to be correlated to achievement of complete interval surgery for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( p= 0.108). Conclusions: ctDNA may be a promising non-invasive marker to assess peritoneal cancer spreading and to predict surgical resectability after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. If confirmed in larger populations, this may enable to avoid additional surgical explorations for patients who remain ctDNA positive after chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03302884