22 research outputs found
Dynamics of cell population structure in liver biopsy of the patients with chronic hepatitis viral infection
The cell population analysis of liver biopsies from the patients with both chronic hepatitis, chronic viral hepatitis C (HCV) and chronic viral hepatitis B (HBV) included the comparative evaluation of the specific part of non-parenchymal elements, analysis of the liver plates and sinusoids areas, the cell population of liver plates and sinusoids, the caryometric description of different types of cells. The essential difference of similar quantitative indexes in the biopsy specimens of patients with HCV and ΠΠV was revealed and discussed. In total, the quantitative analysis of cell population structure in liver biopsies during the course of chronic hepatitis, especially in the case of defective biopsies, could be used for diagnostics and prognoses by expert evaluation
ΠΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΏΡΠΈ Π³Π½ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΠΎ-Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΡ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΡ ΠΌΡΠ³ΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉ
Objective. Identification of laboratory parameters that are used in routine practice and can serve as diagnostic and prognostic criteria for the development of sepsis and its outcomes in patients with purulent-inflammatory diseases of soft tissues.Materials and methods. The study included 48 patients with purulent-inflammatory diseases of soft tissues. Recorded the occurrence of such clinical events as the development of sepsis or septic shock, intensive therapy, death or recovery and discharge from the hospital. For the diagnosis of sepsis, a SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment score) Β³ 2 points was used. Patients were divided into subgroups according to the number of points according to the SOFA scale, intensive care and depending on the outcome of the disease: Subgroup 1 β 26 patients with sepsis (SOFA Β³ 2 points) and 22 patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and SOFA <2 points; 2nd subgroup β 12 people who underwent intensive therapy and 36 people without it; 3rd subgroup β 7 patients with a fatal outcome and 41 patients with a favorable outcome.Results. In patients with sepsis, albumin concentration was 24,07 g / l in median versus 34,65 g / l in the control group of patients with SOFA <2 points (p <0,01); glucose -7,82 mmol / l and 5,15 mmol / l (p <0,01); sodium concentration of 133 mmol / li 139 mmol / l (p <0,01). The values of the international normalized ratio (INR) amounted to a median of 1,29 and 1,04 (p <0,01); activated partial thromboplastin time -36,20 seconds and 31,50 seconds (p <0,01). In the subgroup of patients for whom intensive therapy was required, the concentration of albumin was 22,34 g / l by median versus 30,10 g / l (p <0,01); urea β 15,50 mmol / l versus 6,00 mmol / l (p <0,05), glucose β 9,61 mmol / l against 5,80 mmol / l (p <0,05), lactate dehydrogenase-644,00 U / l and 426,00 U / l (p <0,05); INR β 1,35 against 1,05 (p <0,05). The aver-age total protein concentration is 47,80 g / l versus 57,90 g / l (p <0,01). The average albumin is 22,34 g / l versus 28,50 g / l (p <0,05). The glucose concentration among patients with a fatal outcome was 12,00 mmol / l in median versus 5,95 mmol / l (p <0,01); urea β 23,22 mmol / l versus 6,00 mmol / l (p <0,01). The incidence of lethal disease was statistically significantly higher in patients with a total protein level of less than 52 g / l 5,96 times (RR = 5,96, 95% CI 1,32 β 26,89), glucose more than 11 mmol / l β 7,00 times (OR = 7,00, 95% CI 1,25 β 39,15), urea more than 20 mmol / l β 7,05 times (RR = 7,05, 95% CI 2,00 β 24,85).Conclusion. Routine laboratory indicators as the level of total protein, albumin, glucose, sodium and urea, as well as indicators of the blood coagulation system (INR and APTT), can serve as diagnostic and prognostic criteria for the development of sepsis and its outcomes in patients with purulentinflammatory diseases. soft tissue.Π¦Π΅Π»Ρ: Π²ΡΡΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠ΅ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΠ·ΡΡΡΡΡ Π² ΡΡΡΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡΠ°ΠΊΡΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π³Π½ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΠΎ-Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΡΠ³ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉ.ΠΠ°ΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ. Π ΠΈΡΡΠ»Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΎ 48 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π³Π½ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΠΎ-Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΡΠ³ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉ. ΠΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΡΠ΅Ρ Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠ»ΠΈΠ½ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΎΠ±ΡΡΠΈΠΉ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠ΅ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠΎΠΊΠ°, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, Π»Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΉ ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π²ΡΠ·Π΄ΠΎΡΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ Π²ΡΠΏΠΈΡΠΊΠ° ΠΈΠ· ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΎΠ½Π°ΡΠ°. ΠΠ»Ρ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ°Π½ΠΎΠ²ΠΊΠΈ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° Β«ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΒ» ΠΏΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Ρ SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment score) Β³Β 2 Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ². ΠΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΡ Π±ΡΠ»ΠΈ ΡΠ°ΡΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½Ρ Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΡ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΡΠ²Ρ Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎ ΡΠΊΠ°Π»Π΅ SOFA, ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π² Π·Π°Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΠΌΠΎΡΡΠΈ ΠΎΡ ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ: 1-Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ° β 26 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΌ (SOFAΒ Β³Β 2 Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ²) ΠΈ 22 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠ° Ρ ΡΠΈΠ½Π΄ΡΠΎΠΌΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ²Π΅ΡΠ° (Π‘Π‘ΠΠ ) ΠΈ SOFA < 2 Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ²; 2-Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ° β 12 ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ, ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΌ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½Π°Ρ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΡ, ΠΈ 36 ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ Π±Π΅Π· Π½Π΅Π΅; 3-Ρ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ° β 7 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ Π»Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈ 41 ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ Ρ Π±Π»Π°Π³ΠΎΠΏΡΠΈΡΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ.Π Π΅Π·ΡΠ»ΡΡΠ°ΡΡ. Π£ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠΎΠΌ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π°Π»ΡΠ±ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½Π° ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π° ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π½Π΅ 24,07 Π³/Π» ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 34,65 Π³/Π» Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΡΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡΠ½ΡΡ
Ρ SOFA < 2 Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ² (p< 0,01); Π³Π»ΡΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρ β 7,82 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π» ΠΈ 5,15 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π» (p< 0,01); ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π½Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ 133 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π» ΠΈ 139 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π» (p< 0,01). ΠΠ½Π°ΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡΠ½Π°ΡΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½ΠΎΡΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ (ΠΠΠ) ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π½Π΅ 1,29 ΠΈ1,04 (p< 0,01); Π°ΠΊΡΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΠ°ΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΠΏΠ»Π°ΡΡΠΈΠ½ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π²ΡΠ΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ β 36,20 Ρ ΠΈ 31,50 Ρ (p< 0,01). Π ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³ΡΡΠΏΠΏΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡΠΎΡΡΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡΡΠ΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΡΠ΅ΡΠ°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΠΈ Π°Π»ΡΠ±ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½Π° ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π½Π΅ 22,34 Π³/Π» ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 30,10 Π³/Π» (p< 0,01); ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ½Ρ β 15,50 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π» ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 6,00 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π» (p< 0,05), Π³Π»ΡΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρβ 9,61 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π»ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 5,80 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π»(p< 0,05), Π»Π°ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ΄Π΅Π³ΠΈΠ΄ΡΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π°Π·Ρ β 644,00 ΠΠ΄/Π» ΠΈ 426,00 ΠΠ΄/Π» (p< 0,05); ΠΠΠ β 1,35 ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 1,05 (p< 0,05). Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΡΡ ΠΊΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° β 47,80 Π³/Π» ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 57,90 Π³/Π» (p < 0,01). Π‘ΡΠ΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ Π°Π»ΡΠ±ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½Π° β 22,34 Π³/Π» ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 28,50 Π³/Π» (p < 0,05). ΠΠΎΠ½ΡΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡ Π³Π»ΡΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρ ΡΡΠ΅Π΄ΠΈ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π»Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌ ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΡΡΠ°Π²ΠΈΠ»Π° ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π½Π΅ 12,00 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π» ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 5,95 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π» (p< 0,01); ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ½Ρ β 23,22 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π» ΠΏΡΠΎΡΠΈΠ² 6,00 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π» (p < 0,01). Π§Π°ΡΡΠΎΡΠ° Π½Π°ΡΡΡΠΏΠ»Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ Π»Π΅ΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ Π±ΡΠ»Π° ΡΡΠ°ΡΠΈΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈ Π·Π½Π°ΡΠΈΠΌΠΎ Π²ΡΡΠ΅ Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ΠΌ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ 52 Π³/Π» Π² 5,96 ΡΠ°Π· (ΠΠ = 5,96, 95 % ΠΠ 1,32 β 26,89), Π³Π»ΡΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 11 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π» β Π² 7,00 ΡΠ°Π· (ΠΠ = 7,00, 95 % ΠΠ 1,25 β 39,15), ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ½Ρ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 20 ΠΌΠΌΠΎΠ»Ρ/Π» β Π² 7,05 ΡΠ°Π· (ΠΠ = 7,05, 95 % ΠΠ 2,00 β 24,85).ΠΠ°ΠΊΠ»ΡΡΠ΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΡΡΡΠΈΠ½Π½ΡΠ΅ Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡΠ°ΡΠΎΡΠ½ΡΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡΡΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½Ρ ΠΎΠ±ΡΠ΅Π³ΠΎ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ°, Π°Π»ΡΠ±ΡΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°, Π³Π»ΡΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρ, Π½Π°ΡΡΠΈΡ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡΠ΅Π²ΠΈΠ½Ρ, Π° ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°ΡΠ΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π΅ΡΡΡΠ²Π°ΡΡΠ΅ΠΉ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌΡ ΠΊΡΠΎΠ²ΠΈ (ΠΠΠ ΠΈ ΠΠ§Π’Π) ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡΡ ΡΠ»ΡΠΆΠΈΡΡ Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ³Π½ΠΎΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΠΌΠΈ ΠΊΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΏΡΠΈΡΠ° ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ ΠΈΡΡ
ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² Ρ ΠΏΠ°ΡΠΈΠ΅Π½ΡΠΎΠ² Ρ Π³Π½ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΠΎ-Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡΠ΅Π»ΡΠ½ΡΠΌΠΈ Π·Π°Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Π°Π½ΠΈΡΠΌΠΈ ΠΌΡΠ³ΠΊΠΈΡ
ΡΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉ
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF CASPASE-3 ACTIVITY IN LIVER BIOPSIES OF PATIENTS WITH MONO AND MIXED INFECTIONS
Objective: to study the activity of proapoptotic signal protein caspase-3 for determination of peculiarities of apoptosis regulation under liverΒ chronic diseases.Subjects and methods. The immunohistochemical analysis of caspase-3 activity in 5 liver biopsies of the patients with mono infection ofΒ chronic hepatitis B and 5 liver biopsies of the patients with mixed infection of tuberculosis, chronic hepatitis C and human immunodeficiencyΒ virus was fulfilled. Morphological and morphometric analysis of serial microphotographs was performed using an image analysis systemΒ (microscope Leica DM 2500, digital camera Leica DFC320 R2 and a computer).Results. The activity of caspase-3 as dark brown granularity was revealed in all tis-sue components of liver (hepatocytes, epithelium of bileΒ ducts, endotheliocytes, Kupffer cells of sinusoids, in compositions of lymphohistiocyte infiltrations). The maximal activity was discovered inΒ hepatocytes nuclei. The expression of caspase-3 was significantly higher in liver biopsies of the patients with mixed infection. It is typical thatΒ the immunoreactive hepatocytes had not any morphological marks of apoptosis.Conclusion. The caspase-3 expression of proapoptotic signal protein caspase-3 may serve as an early marker of liver damage including the possibilitiesΒ of apoptosis development.</p
Diagnostic and prognostic laboratory criteria for the development of sepsis in purulent-inflammatory diseases of soft tissues
Objective. Identification of laboratory parameters that are used in routine practice and can serve as diagnostic and prognostic criteria for the development of sepsis and its outcomes in patients with purulent-inflammatory diseases of soft tissues.Materials and methods. The study included 48 patients with purulent-inflammatory diseases of soft tissues. Recorded the occurrence of such clinical events as the development of sepsis or septic shock, intensive therapy, death or recovery and discharge from the hospital. For the diagnosis of sepsis, a SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment score) Β³ 2 points was used. Patients were divided into subgroups according to the number of points according to the SOFA scale, intensive care and depending on the outcome of the disease: Subgroup 1 β 26 patients with sepsis (SOFA Β³ 2 points) and 22 patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and SOFA <2 points; 2nd subgroup β 12 people who underwent intensive therapy and 36 people without it; 3rd subgroup β 7 patients with a fatal outcome and 41 patients with a favorable outcome.Results. In patients with sepsis, albumin concentration was 24,07 g / l in median versus 34,65 g / l in the control group of patients with SOFA <2 points (p <0,01); glucose -7,82 mmol / l and 5,15 mmol / l (p <0,01); sodium concentration of 133 mmol / li 139 mmol / l (p <0,01). The values of the international normalized ratio (INR) amounted to a median of 1,29 and 1,04 (p <0,01); activated partial thromboplastin time -36,20 seconds and 31,50 seconds (p <0,01). In the subgroup of patients for whom intensive therapy was required, the concentration of albumin was 22,34 g / l by median versus 30,10 g / l (p <0,01); urea β 15,50 mmol / l versus 6,00 mmol / l (p <0,05), glucose β 9,61 mmol / l against 5,80 mmol / l (p <0,05), lactate dehydrogenase-644,00 U / l and 426,00 U / l (p <0,05); INR β 1,35 against 1,05 (p <0,05). The aver-age total protein concentration is 47,80 g / l versus 57,90 g / l (p <0,01). The average albumin is 22,34 g / l versus 28,50 g / l (p <0,05). The glucose concentration among patients with a fatal outcome was 12,00 mmol / l in median versus 5,95 mmol / l (p <0,01); urea β 23,22 mmol / l versus 6,00 mmol / l (p <0,01). The incidence of lethal disease was statistically significantly higher in patients with a total protein level of less than 52 g / l 5,96 times (RR = 5,96, 95% CI 1,32 β 26,89), glucose more than 11 mmol / l β 7,00 times (OR = 7,00, 95% CI 1,25 β 39,15), urea more than 20 mmol / l β 7,05 times (RR = 7,05, 95% CI 2,00 β 24,85).Conclusion. Routine laboratory indicators as the level of total protein, albumin, glucose, sodium and urea, as well as indicators of the blood coagulation system (INR and APTT), can serve as diagnostic and prognostic criteria for the development of sepsis and its outcomes in patients with purulentinflammatory diseases. soft tissue
Devising A Procedure to Calculate and Analyze Parameters for Passing the Flood and Breakthrough Wave Taking Into Consideration the Topographical and Hydraulic Riverbed Irregularities
It has been established that the most likely period of breakthrough wave occurrence is the time of spring flooding or heavy rain when water-head facilities are subjected to significant loads that lead to the collapse of their individual elements or the entire structure. In addition, the possibility of man-made accidents that can occur at any time cannot be ruled out.
It has been proven that breakthrough wave formation depends on the nature of the destruction or the overflow through a water-head facility. For the study reported in this paper, a model of the kinematics of riverbed and breakthrough flows was used, which is based on the equations of flow, washout, and transport of sediments that are averaged for the depths of the stream. The differential equations describing the nonstationary flow averaged for depth are solved using the numerical grid system FST2DH (2D Depth-averaged Flow and Sediment Transport Model), which implements a finite-element method on the plan of a riverbed's topographic region. These tools are publicly available, which allows their wide application to specific loads and boundary conditions of mathematical models.
The construction of an estimation grid involving the setting of boundary conditions and the use of geoinformation system tools makes it possible to simulate the destruction of a culvert of the pressure circuit and obtain results for a specific case of an actual riverbed and a water-head facility.
It has been established that there is a decrease in the speed of wave propagation along the profile, from 3 m/s to 1 m/s.
The impact of bottom irregularities, the effect of floodplains, and the variety of bottom roughness have also been assessed, compared to the results of their calculation based on one-dimensional models given in the regulatory documents.
Hydraulic calculations were carried out taking into consideration the related properties of the main layer of the floodplain, which consists of peat accumulations, and the heterogeneity of the depths and roughness of floodplain surfaces of soils. It has been established that there is almost no erosion of supports in the floodplain zone in this case.
It was found that as the distance between the flow and breakthrough intersection increases, there is a decrease in the height of the head from 2.1 m to 1.25 m