22 research outputs found

    Dynamics of cell population structure in liver biopsy of the patients with chronic hepatitis viral infection

    Get PDF
    The cell population analysis of liver biopsies from the patients with both chronic hepatitis, chronic viral hepatitis C (HCV) and chronic viral hepatitis B (HBV) included the comparative evaluation of the specific part of non-parenchymal elements, analysis of the liver plates and sinusoids areas, the cell population of liver plates and sinusoids, the caryometric description of different types of cells. The essential difference of similar quantitative indexes in the biopsy specimens of patients with HCV and НВV was revealed and discussed. In total, the quantitative analysis of cell population structure in liver biopsies during the course of chronic hepatitis, especially in the case of defective biopsies, could be used for diagnostics and prognoses by expert evaluation

    ДиагностичСскиС ΠΈ прогностичСскиС Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΊΡ€ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠΈ развития сСпсиса ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ Π³Π½ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΠΎ-Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… заболСваниях мягких Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉ

    Get PDF
    Objective. Identification of laboratory parameters that are used in routine practice and can serve as diagnostic and prognostic criteria for the development of sepsis and its outcomes in patients with purulent-inflammatory diseases of soft tissues.Materials and methods. The study included 48 patients with purulent-inflammatory diseases of soft tissues. Recorded the occurrence of such clinical events as the development of sepsis or septic shock, intensive therapy, death or recovery and discharge from the hospital. For the diagnosis of sepsis, a SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment score) Β³ 2 points was used. Patients were divided into subgroups according to the number of points according to the SOFA scale, intensive care and depending on the outcome of the disease: Subgroup 1 – 26 patients with sepsis (SOFA Β³ 2 points) and 22 patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and SOFA <2 points; 2nd subgroup – 12 people who underwent intensive therapy and 36 people without it; 3rd subgroup – 7 patients with a fatal outcome and 41 patients with a favorable outcome.Results. In patients with sepsis, albumin concentration was 24,07 g / l in median versus 34,65 g / l in the control group of patients with SOFA <2 points (p <0,01); glucose -7,82 mmol / l and 5,15 mmol / l (p <0,01); sodium concentration of 133 mmol / li 139 mmol / l (p <0,01). The values of the international normalized ratio (INR) amounted to a median of 1,29 and 1,04 (p <0,01); activated partial thromboplastin time -36,20 seconds and 31,50 seconds (p <0,01). In the subgroup of patients for whom intensive therapy was required, the concentration of albumin was 22,34 g / l by median versus 30,10 g / l (p <0,01); urea – 15,50 mmol / l versus 6,00 mmol / l (p <0,05), glucose – 9,61 mmol / l against 5,80 mmol / l (p <0,05), lactate dehydrogenase-644,00 U / l and 426,00 U / l (p <0,05); INR – 1,35 against 1,05 (p <0,05). The aver-age total protein concentration is 47,80 g / l versus 57,90 g / l (p <0,01). The average albumin is 22,34 g / l versus 28,50 g / l (p <0,05). The glucose concentration among patients with a fatal outcome was 12,00 mmol / l in median versus 5,95 mmol / l (p <0,01); urea – 23,22 mmol / l versus 6,00 mmol / l (p <0,01). The incidence of lethal disease was statistically significantly higher in patients with a total protein level of less than 52 g / l 5,96 times (RR = 5,96, 95% CI 1,32 – 26,89), glucose more than 11 mmol / l – 7,00 times (OR = 7,00, 95% CI 1,25 – 39,15), urea more than 20 mmol / l – 7,05 times (RR = 7,05, 95% CI 2,00 – 24,85).Conclusion. Routine laboratory indicators as the level of total protein, albumin, glucose, sodium and urea, as well as indicators of the blood coagulation system (INR and APTT), can serve as diagnostic and prognostic criteria for the development of sepsis and its outcomes in patients with purulentinflammatory diseases. soft tissue.ЦСль: выявлСниС Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈΡΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ·ΡƒΡŽΡ‚ΡΡ Π² Ρ€ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡ€Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠΊΠ΅ ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ ΡΠ»ΡƒΠΆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ диагностичСскими ΠΈ прогностичСскими критСриями развития сСпсиса ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ исходов Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с Π³Π½ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΠΎ-Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ заболСваниями мягких Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉ.ΠœΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π’ исслСдованиС Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΎ 48 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с Π³Π½ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΠΎ-Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ заболСваниями мягких Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉ. ΠŸΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΡƒΡ‡Π΅Ρ‚ наступлСния Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΈΡ… клиничСских событий, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ΅ сСпсиса ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ сСптичСского шока, ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ интСнсивной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, Π»Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΉ исход ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ Π²Ρ‹Π·Π΄ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΈ выписка ΠΈΠ· стационара. Для постановки Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π³Π½ΠΎΠ·Π° «сСпсис» примСняли ΡˆΠΊΠ°Π»Ρƒ SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment score) Β³Β 2 Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ². ΠŸΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ‹ Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ распрСдСлСны Π² ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΡ‹ ΠΏΠΎ количСству Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ² ΠΏΠΎ шкалС SOFA, провСдСния интСнсивной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ Π² зависимости ΠΎΡ‚ исхода заболСвания: 1-я ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ° – 26 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… сСпсисом (SOFAΒ Β³Β 2 Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ²) ΠΈ 22 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° с синдромом систСмного Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‚Π° (Π‘Π‘Π’Π ) ΠΈ SOFA < 2 Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ²; 2-я ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ° – 12 Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ, ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ»Π°ΡΡŒ интСнсивная тСрапия, ΠΈ 36 Ρ‡Π΅Π»ΠΎΠ²Π΅ΠΊ Π±Π΅Π· Π½Π΅Π΅; 3-я ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ° – 7 Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… с Π»Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ исходом ΠΈ 41 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ с благоприятным исходом.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. Π£ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с сСпсисом концСнтрация Π°Π»ΡŒΠ±ΡƒΠΌΠΈΠ½Π° составила ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π½Π΅ 24,07 Π³/Π» ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 34,65 Π³/Π» Π² ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠΉ Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ΅ Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… с SOFA < 2 Π±Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ² (p< 0,01); Π³Π»ΡŽΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρ‹ – 7,82 ммоль/Π» ΠΈ 5,15 ммоль/Π» (p< 0,01); концСнтрация натрия 133 ммоль/Π» ΠΈ 139 ммоль/Π» (p< 0,01). ЗначСния ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄ΡƒΠ½Π°Ρ€ΠΎΠ΄Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Π½ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Π»ΠΈΠ·ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡˆΠ΅Π½ΠΈΡ (МНО) составили ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π½Π΅ 1,29 ΠΈ1,04 (p< 0,01); Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²ΠΈΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ частичного тромбопластинового Π²Ρ€Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΠΈ – 36,20 с ΠΈ 31,50 с (p< 0,01). Π’ ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π³Ρ€ΡƒΠΏΠΏΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ², ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±ΠΎΠ²Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡŒ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ интСнсивной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ, ΠΊΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π»ΡŒΠ±ΡƒΠΌΠΈΠ½Π° составили ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π½Π΅ 22,34 Π³/Π» ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 30,10 Π³/Π» (p< 0,01); ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ – 15,50 ммоль/Π» ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 6,00 ммоль/Π» (p< 0,05), Π³Π»ΡŽΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρ‹β€“ 9,61 ммоль/Π»ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 5,80 ммоль/Π»(p< 0,05), Π»Π°ΠΊΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΄Π΅Π³ΠΈΠ΄Ρ€ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π°Π·Ρ‹ – 644,00 Π•Π΄/Π» ΠΈ 426,00 Π•Π΄/Π» (p< 0,05); МНО – 1,35 ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 1,05 (p< 0,05). БрСдняя концСнтрация ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° – 47,80 Π³/Π» ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 57,90 Π³/Π» (p < 0,01). Π‘Ρ€Π΅Π΄Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ Π°Π»ΡŒΠ±ΡƒΠΌΠΈΠ½Π° – 22,34 Π³/Π» ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 28,50 Π³/Π» (p < 0,05). ΠšΠΎΠ½Ρ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΡ Π³Π»ΡŽΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρ‹ срСди ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с Π»Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌ исходом составила ΠΏΠΎ ΠΌΠ΅Π΄ΠΈΠ°Π½Π΅ 12,00 ммоль/Π» ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 5,95 ммоль/Π» (p< 0,01); ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ – 23,22 ммоль/Π» ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ‚ΠΈΠ² 6,00 ммоль/Π» (p < 0,01). Частота наступлСния Π»Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ исхода Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π·Π½ΠΈ Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° статистичСски Π·Π½Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΠΌΠΎ Π²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π½Π΅ΠΌ ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ° ΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π΅ 52 Π³/Π» Π² 5,96 Ρ€Π°Π· (ОР = 5,96, 95 % Π”Π˜ 1,32 – 26,89), Π³Π»ΡŽΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρ‹ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 11 ммоль/Π» – Π² 7,00 Ρ€Π°Π· (ОР = 7,00, 95 % Π”Π˜ 1,25 – 39,15), ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹ Π±ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π΅ 20 ммоль/Π» – Π² 7,05 Ρ€Π°Π· (ОР = 7,05, 95 % Π”Π˜ 2,00 – 24,85).Π—Π°ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ Ρ€ΡƒΡ‚ΠΈΠ½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ Π»Π°Π±ΠΎΡ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΡƒΡ€ΠΎΠ²Π΅Π½ΡŒ ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ Π±Π΅Π»ΠΊΠ°, Π°Π»ΡŒΠ±ΡƒΠΌΠΈΠ½Π°, Π³Π»ΡŽΠΊΠΎΠ·Ρ‹, натрия ΠΈ ΠΌΠΎΡ‡Π΅Π²ΠΈΠ½Ρ‹, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ ΡΠ²Π΅Ρ€Ρ‚Ρ‹Π²Π°ΡŽΡ‰Π΅ΠΉ систСмы ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΈ (МНО ΠΈ АЧВВ) ΠΌΠΎΠ³ΡƒΡ‚ ΡΠ»ΡƒΠΆΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ диагностичСскими ΠΈ прогностичСскими критСриями развития сСпсиса ΠΈ Π΅Π³ΠΎ исходов Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с Π³Π½ΠΎΠΉΠ½ΠΎ-Π²ΠΎΡΠΏΠ°Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ заболСваниями мягких Ρ‚ΠΊΠ°Π½Π΅ΠΉ

    IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF CASPASE-3 ACTIVITY IN LIVER BIOPSIES OF PATIENTS WITH MONO AND MIXED INFECTIONS

    No full text
    Objective: to study the activity of proapoptotic signal protein caspase-3 for determination of peculiarities of apoptosis regulation under liverΒ chronic diseases.Subjects and methods. The immunohistochemical analysis of caspase-3 activity in 5 liver biopsies of the patients with mono infection ofΒ chronic hepatitis B and 5 liver biopsies of the patients with mixed infection of tuberculosis, chronic hepatitis C and human immunodeficiencyΒ virus was fulfilled. Morphological and morphometric analysis of serial microphotographs was performed using an image analysis systemΒ (microscope Leica DM 2500, digital camera Leica DFC320 R2 and a computer).Results. The activity of caspase-3 as dark brown granularity was revealed in all tis-sue components of liver (hepatocytes, epithelium of bileΒ ducts, endotheliocytes, Kupffer cells of sinusoids, in compositions of lymphohistiocyte infiltrations). The maximal activity was discovered inΒ hepatocytes nuclei. The expression of caspase-3 was significantly higher in liver biopsies of the patients with mixed infection. It is typical thatΒ the immunoreactive hepatocytes had not any morphological marks of apoptosis.Conclusion. The caspase-3 expression of proapoptotic signal protein caspase-3 may serve as an early marker of liver damage including the possibilitiesΒ of apoptosis development.</p

    Diagnostic and prognostic laboratory criteria for the development of sepsis in purulent-inflammatory diseases of soft tissues

    Get PDF
    Objective. Identification of laboratory parameters that are used in routine practice and can serve as diagnostic and prognostic criteria for the development of sepsis and its outcomes in patients with purulent-inflammatory diseases of soft tissues.Materials and methods. The study included 48 patients with purulent-inflammatory diseases of soft tissues. Recorded the occurrence of such clinical events as the development of sepsis or septic shock, intensive therapy, death or recovery and discharge from the hospital. For the diagnosis of sepsis, a SOFA (Sepsis-related organ failure assessment score) Β³ 2 points was used. Patients were divided into subgroups according to the number of points according to the SOFA scale, intensive care and depending on the outcome of the disease: Subgroup 1 – 26 patients with sepsis (SOFA Β³ 2 points) and 22 patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and SOFA &lt;2 points; 2nd subgroup – 12 people who underwent intensive therapy and 36 people without it; 3rd subgroup – 7 patients with a fatal outcome and 41 patients with a favorable outcome.Results. In patients with sepsis, albumin concentration was 24,07 g / l in median versus 34,65 g / l in the control group of patients with SOFA &lt;2 points (p &lt;0,01); glucose -7,82 mmol / l and 5,15 mmol / l (p &lt;0,01); sodium concentration of 133 mmol / li 139 mmol / l (p &lt;0,01). The values of the international normalized ratio (INR) amounted to a median of 1,29 and 1,04 (p &lt;0,01); activated partial thromboplastin time -36,20 seconds and 31,50 seconds (p &lt;0,01). In the subgroup of patients for whom intensive therapy was required, the concentration of albumin was 22,34 g / l by median versus 30,10 g / l (p &lt;0,01); urea – 15,50 mmol / l versus 6,00 mmol / l (p &lt;0,05), glucose – 9,61 mmol / l against 5,80 mmol / l (p &lt;0,05), lactate dehydrogenase-644,00 U / l and 426,00 U / l (p &lt;0,05); INR – 1,35 against 1,05 (p &lt;0,05). The aver-age total protein concentration is 47,80 g / l versus 57,90 g / l (p &lt;0,01). The average albumin is 22,34 g / l versus 28,50 g / l (p &lt;0,05). The glucose concentration among patients with a fatal outcome was 12,00 mmol / l in median versus 5,95 mmol / l (p &lt;0,01); urea – 23,22 mmol / l versus 6,00 mmol / l (p &lt;0,01). The incidence of lethal disease was statistically significantly higher in patients with a total protein level of less than 52 g / l 5,96 times (RR = 5,96, 95% CI 1,32 – 26,89), glucose more than 11 mmol / l – 7,00 times (OR = 7,00, 95% CI 1,25 – 39,15), urea more than 20 mmol / l – 7,05 times (RR = 7,05, 95% CI 2,00 – 24,85).Conclusion. Routine laboratory indicators as the level of total protein, albumin, glucose, sodium and urea, as well as indicators of the blood coagulation system (INR and APTT), can serve as diagnostic and prognostic criteria for the development of sepsis and its outcomes in patients with purulentinflammatory diseases. soft tissue

    Devising A Procedure to Calculate and Analyze Parameters for Passing the Flood and Breakthrough Wave Taking Into Consideration the Topographical and Hydraulic Riverbed Irregularities

    Full text link
    It has been established that the most likely period of breakthrough wave occurrence is the time of spring flooding or heavy rain when water-head facilities are subjected to significant loads that lead to the collapse of their individual elements or the entire structure. In addition, the possibility of man-made accidents that can occur at any time cannot be ruled out. It has been proven that breakthrough wave formation depends on the nature of the destruction or the overflow through a water-head facility. For the study reported in this paper, a model of the kinematics of riverbed and breakthrough flows was used, which is based on the equations of flow, washout, and transport of sediments that are averaged for the depths of the stream. The differential equations describing the nonstationary flow averaged for depth are solved using the numerical grid system FST2DH (2D Depth-averaged Flow and Sediment Transport Model), which implements a finite-element method on the plan of a riverbed's topographic region. These tools are publicly available, which allows their wide application to specific loads and boundary conditions of mathematical models. The construction of an estimation grid involving the setting of boundary conditions and the use of geoinformation system tools makes it possible to simulate the destruction of a culvert of the pressure circuit and obtain results for a specific case of an actual riverbed and a water-head facility. It has been established that there is a decrease in the speed of wave propagation along the profile, from 3 m/s to 1 m/s. The impact of bottom irregularities, the effect of floodplains, and the variety of bottom roughness have also been assessed, compared to the results of their calculation based on one-dimensional models given in the regulatory documents. Hydraulic calculations were carried out taking into consideration the related properties of the main layer of the floodplain, which consists of peat accumulations, and the heterogeneity of the depths and roughness of floodplain surfaces of soils. It has been established that there is almost no erosion of supports in the floodplain zone in this case. It was found that as the distance between the flow and breakthrough intersection increases, there is a decrease in the height of the head from 2.1 m to 1.25 m
    corecore