36 research outputs found

    Degenerative inter-vertebral disc disease osteochondrosis intervertebralis in Europe: prevalence, geographic variation and radiological correlates in men and women aged 50 and over.

    Get PDF
    Objectives.: To assess the prevalences across Europe of radiological indices of degenerative inter-vertebral disc disease (DDD); and to quantify their associations with, age, sex, physical anthropometry, areal BMD (aBMD) and change in aBMD with time. Methods.: In the population-based European Prospective Osteoporosis Study, 27 age-stratified samples of men and women from across the continent aged 50+ years had standardized lateral radiographs of the lumbar and thoracic spine to evaluate the severity of DDD, using the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) scale. Measurements of anterior, mid-body and posterior vertebral heights on all assessed vertebrae from T4 to L4 were used to generate indices of end-plate curvature. Results.: Images from 10 132 participants (56% female, mean age 63.9 years) passed quality checks. Overall, 47% of men and women had DDD grade 3 or more in the lumbar spine and 36% in both thoracic and lumbar spine. Risk ratios for DDD grades 3 and 4, adjusted for age and anthropometric determinants, varied across a three-fold range between centres, yet prevalences were highly correlated in men and women. DDD was associated with flattened, non-ovoid inter-vertebral disc spaces. KL grade 4 and loss of inter-vertebral disc space were associated with higher spine aBMD. Conclusion.: KL grades 3 and 4 are often used clinically to categorize radiological DDD. Highly variable European prevalences of radiologically defined DDD grades 3+ along with the large effects of age may have growing and geographically unequal health and economic impacts as the population ages. These data encourage further studies of potential genetic and environmental causes

    Determinants of the use of health and fitness mobile apps by patients with asthma: secondary analysis of observational studies

    Get PDF
    Background: Health and fitness apps have potential benefits to improve self-management and disease control among patients with asthma. However, inconsistent use rates have been reported across studies, regions, and health systems. A better understanding of the characteristics of users and nonusers is critical to design solutions that are effectively integrated in patients’ daily lives, and to ensure that these equitably reach out to different groups of patients, thus improving rather than entrenching health inequities. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the use of general health and fitness apps by patients with asthma and to identify determinants of usage. Methods: A secondary analysis of the INSPIRERS observational studies was conducted using data from face-to-face visits. Patients with a diagnosis of asthma were included between November 2017 and August 2020. Individual-level data were collected, including age, gender, marital status, educational level, health status, presence of anxiety and depression, postcode, socioeconomic level, digital literacy, use of health services, and use of health and fitness apps. Multivariate logistic regression was used to model the probability of being a health and fitness app user. Statistical analysis was performed in R. Results: A total of 526 patients attended a face-to-face visit in the 49 recruiting centers and 514 had complete data. Most participants were ≤40 years old (66.4%), had at least 10 years of education (57.4%), and were in the 3 higher quintiles of the socioeconomic deprivation index (70.1%). The majority reported an overall good health status (visual analogue scale [VAS] score>70 in 93.1%) and the prevalence of anxiety and depression was 34.3% and 11.9%, respectively. The proportion of participants who reported using health and fitness mobile apps was 41.1% (n=211). Multivariate models revealed that single individuals and those with more than 10 years of education are more likely to use health and fitness mobile apps (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.22, 95%CI 1.05-4.75 and aOR 1.95, 95%CI 1.12-3.45, respectively). Higher digital literacy scores were also associated with higher odds of being a user of health and fitness apps, with participants in the second, third, and fourth quartiles reporting aORs of 6.74 (95%CI 2.90-17.40), 10.30 (95%CI 4.28-27.56), and 11.52 (95%CI 4.78-30.87), respectively. Participants with depression symptoms had lower odds of using health and fitness apps (aOR 0.32, 95%CI 0.12-0.83). Conclusions: A better understanding of the barriers and enhancers of app use among patients with lower education, lower digital literacy, or depressive symptoms is key to design tailored interventions to ensure a sustained and equitable use of these technologies. Future studies should also assess users’ general health-seeking behavior and their interest and concerns specifically about digital tools. These factors may impact both initial engagement and sustained use

    Comparison of Caudal Analgesia and Intravenous Diclofenac for Postoperative Pain Relief in Paediatric Patients Undergoing Daycase Herniotomy

    No full text
    Background: Effective postoperative pain management is a vital determinant to when a child can be safely discharged from the hospital after day case surgery. This study compared the effect of caudal bupivacaine block with intravenous diclofenac for postoperative pain relief in children aged 1-7years undergoing herniotomy.Patient and method: Sixty(60) ASA physical status I & II children randomly received caudal block with 0.125% bupivacaine 1ml/kg (Group A) or intravenous infusion of diclofenac 1mg/kg in 4.3% dextrose in 0.18% saline 4ml/kg (Group B) after induction of general anaesthesia. Postoperative pain was assessed in the recovery room with mCHEOPS on arrival, 1, 2, 3, and 4hr intervals. The parents assessed pain for 24 hours postoperatively. Oral paracetamol 20mg/kg was administered if pain was moderate or severe. Total analgesic consumption was compared in both groups at 24hr after surgery.Results: The time to first rescue analgesia was 239.3± 24.6min in group A versus 167.6±43.2min in group B, (p=0.024). Pain scores at 0, 1, 2 and 3hours were significantly different with patients in group A having lower scores at 0-2 hours. The time to micturition was 156.5±28.3min in group A and 182.9±39.5min in group B (p=0.004) while time to ambulation was 186.5± 44.2min in group A, but 218.0± 32.4min in group B (p=0.003). The times to discharge from the recovery room were not different between the groups. Twenty five patients (83.33%) in group A were given oral paracetamol compared with16 patients (53.3%) in group B. No complication was noted in any of the two groups.Conclusion: Caudal bupivacaine provided better post-operativepain relief than i/v diclofenac in the first 3hours after administration but i/v diclofenac decreased pain and analgesic requirement in the latter part of the postoperative period due to its long duration of action

    Projection And Construction Of A Machine To Study The Retention And Wear In Attachments Used On Implant Supported Overdentures

    No full text
    Short Communication selected from the Oral Presentations of the 56th Congress of the Groupèment International pour la Recherche Scientifique en Stomatologie et Odontologie, Peñafiel (Portugal) May 2012
    corecore