Haemato-oncology and burnout: an Italian survey

This cross-sectional survey aimed to evaluate the prevalence of burnout and estimated psychiatric disorders among haemato-oncology healthcare professionals in Italy. The aspects of work that respondents perceive as stressful and satisfying have also been examined. The assessments were made using the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), General Health Questionnaire and a study-specific questionnaire. Logistic regression models were applied to show associations between different sources of work-related stress and burnout. Three hundred and eighty-seven out of 440 (87.95%) returned their questionnaires. The scores on MBI subscales indicate a high level of emotional exhaustion in 32.2% of the physicians and 31.9% of the nurses; a high level of Depersonalisation in 29.8 and 23.6%, respectively; and a low level of personal accomplishment in 12.4 and 15.3% respectively. The estimated prevalence of psychiatric disorders was 36.4% in physicians and 28.8% in nurses. Statistical analysis confirmed age, sex, personal dissatisfaction, physical tiredness and working with demanding patients to be associated with burnout. In conclusion, haemato-oncology healthcare professionals report a level of burnout and estimated psychiatric morbidity comparable to other oncological areas. Knowledge of the mechanisms of burnout and preventing and dealing with them is therefore a fundamental requirement for the improvement of quality in health services and job satisfaction

EGFR molecular profiling in advanced NSCLC: a prospective phase II study in molecularly/clinically selected patients pretreated with chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related molecular markers to prospectively identify tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitive patients, particularly after a previous chemotherapy treatment, is currently under debate. METHODS: We designed a prospective phase II study to evaluate the activity of EGFR-TKI in four different patient groups, according to the combination of molecular (EGFR gene mutations, EGFR gene copy number and protein expression, and phosphorylated AKT expression, pAKT) and clinicopathological (histology and smoking habits) factors. Correlations between molecular alterations and clinical outcome were also explored retrospectively for first-line chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI treatment. RESULTS: Patients who had progressed during or after first-line chemotherapy were prospectively assigned to EGFR-TKI treatment as follows: (G1) EGFR mutation (n = 12); (G2) highly polysomic/amplified EGFR (n = 18); (G3) EGFR and/or pAKT positive (n = 41); (G4) adenocarcinoma/bronchoalveolar carcinoma and no smoking history (n = 15). G1 and G4 had the best and second-best overall response rate (25% and 20%, respectively), whereas the worst outcome was observed in G2 (ORR, 6%; p = 0.05). Disease control was highest in G1 and G4 (>50%) and lowest in G3 (<20%) (p = 0.02). Patients selected by EGFR mutation or clinical parameters (G1 and G4) also had significantly better progression-free survival and overall survival (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed the impact of sex, smoking history, EGFR/KRAS mutation, and pAKT on outcomes and allowed us to derive an efficient predictive model. Histology, EGFR mutations, and pAKT were independent predictors of response to first-line chemotherapy at retrospective analysis, whereas pAKT and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression were the only independent predictors of progression-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Selection of patients based on either EGFR mutation or clinical characteristics seems an effective approach to optimize EGFR-TKI treatment in chemotherapy-pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer patients

EGFR molecular profiling in advanced NSCLC: a prospective phase II study in molecularly/clinically selected patients pretreated with chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal use of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related molecular markers to prospectively identify tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-sensitive patients, particularly after a previous chemotherapy treatment, is currently under debate. METHODS: We designed a prospective phase II study to evaluate the activity of EGFR-TKI in four different patient groups, according to the combination of molecular (EGFR gene mutations, EGFR gene copy number and protein expression, and phosphorylated AKT expression, pAKT) and clinicopathological (histology and smoking habits) factors. Correlations between molecular alterations and clinical outcome were also explored retrospectively for first-line chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI treatment. RESULTS: Patients who had progressed during or after first-line chemotherapy were prospectively assigned to EGFR-TKI treatment as follows: (G1) EGFR mutation (n = 12); (G2) highly polysomic/amplified EGFR (n = 18); (G3) EGFR and/or pAKT positive (n = 41); (G4) adenocarcinoma/bronchoalveolar carcinoma and no smoking history (n = 15). G1 and G4 had the best and second-best overall response rate (25% and 20%, respectively), whereas the worst outcome was observed in G2 (ORR, 6%; p = 0.05). Disease control was highest in G1 and G4 (>50%) and lowest in G3 (<20%) (p = 0.02). Patients selected by EGFR mutation or clinical parameters (G1 and G4) also had significantly better progression-free survival and overall survival (p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed the impact of sex, smoking history, EGFR/KRAS mutation, and pAKT on outcomes and allowed us to derive an efficient predictive model. Histology, EGFR mutations, and pAKT were independent predictors of response to first-line chemotherapy at retrospective analysis, whereas pAKT and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 expression were the only independent predictors of progression-free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Selection of patients based on either EGFR mutation or clinical characteristics seems an effective approach to optimize EGFR-TKI treatment in chemotherapy-pretreated non-small-cell lung cancer patients

Boceprevir or telaprevir in hepatitis C virus chronic infection: The Italian real life experience.

AIM:To check the safety and efficacy of boceprevir/telaprevir with peginterferon/ribavirin for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 in the real-world settings. METHODS: This study was a non-randomized, observational, prospective, multicenter. This study involved 47 centers in Italy. A database was prepared for the homogenous collection of the data, was used by all of the centers for data collection, and was updated continuously. All of the patients enrolled in this study were older than 18 years of age and were diagnosed with chronic infection due to HCV genotype 1. The HCV RNA testing was performed using COBAS-TaqMan2.0 (Roche, LLQ 25 IU/mL). RESULTS: All consecutively treated patients were included. Forty-seven centers enrolled 834 patients as follows: Male 64%; median age 57 (range 18-78), of whom 18.3% were over 65; mean body mass index 25.6 (range 16-39); genotype 1b (79.4%); diagnosis of cirrhosis (38.2%); and fibrosis F3/4 (71.2%). The following drugs were used: Telaprevir (66.2%) and PEG-IFN-alpha2a (67.6%). Patients were naïve (24.4%), relapsers (30.5%), partial responders (14.8%) and null responders (30.3%). Overall, adverse events (AEs) occurred in 617 patients (73.9%) during the treatment. Anemia was the most frequent AE (52.9% of cases), especially in cirrhotic. The therapy was stopped for 14.6% of the patients because of adverse events or virological failure (15%). Sustained virological response was achieved in 62.7% of the cases, but was 43.8% in cirrhotic patients over 65 years of age. CONCLUSION: In everyday practice, triple therapy is safe but has moderate efficacy, especially for patients over 65 years of age, with advanced fibrosis, non-responders to peginterferon + ribavirin