41 research outputs found

    Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant Referral and Evaluation among Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Georgia

    No full text
    Liver transplantation offers the best survival for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Prior studies have demonstrated disparities in transplant access; none have examined the early steps of the transplant process. We identified determinants of access to transplant referral and evaluation among patients with HCC with a single tumor either within Milan or meeting downstaging criteria in Georgia.Population-based cancer registry data from 2010 to 2019 were linked to liver transplant centers in Georgia. Primary cohort: adult patients with HCC with a single tumor ≤8 cm in diameter, no extrahepatic involvement, and no vascular involvement. Secondary cohort: primary cohort plus patients with multiple tumors confined to one lobe. We estimated time to transplant referral, evaluation initiation, and evaluation completion, accounting for the competing risk of death. In sensitivity analyses, we also accounted for non-transplant cancer treatment.Among 1,379 patients with early-stage HCC in Georgia, 26% were referred to liver transplant. Private insurance and younger age were associated with increased likelihood of referral, while requiring downstaging was associated with lower likelihood of referral. Patients living in census tracts with ≥20% of residents in poverty were less likely to initiate evaluation among those referred [cause-specific hazard ratio (csHR): 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.42-0.94]. Medicaid patients were less likely to complete the evaluation once initiated (csHR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32-0.89).Different sociodemographic factors were associated with each stage of the transplant process among patients with early-stage HCC in Georgia, emphasizing unique barriers to access and the need for targeted interventions at each step. Significance: Among patients with early-stage HCC in Georgia, age and insurance type were associated with referral to liver transplant, race, and poverty with evaluation initiation, and insurance type with evaluation completion. Opportunities to improve transplant access include informing referring providers about insurance requirements, addressing barriers to evaluation initiation, and streamlining the evaluation process

    DNA methylation differentiates smoking from vaping and non-combustible tobacco use

    No full text
    Increasing use of non-combusted forms of nicotine such as e-cigarettes poses important public health questions regarding their specific risks relative to combusted tobacco products such as cigarettes. To fully delineate these risks, improved biomarkers that can distinguish between these forms of nicotine use are needed. Prior work has suggested that methylation status at cg05575921 may serve as a specific biomarker of combusted tobacco smoke exposure. We hypothesized combining this epigenetic biomarker with conventional metabolite assays could classify the type of nicotine product consumption. Therefore, we determined DNA methylation and serum cotinine values in samples from 112 smokers, 35 e-cigarette users, 19 smokeless tobacco users, and 269 controls, and performed mass spectroscopy analyses of urine samples from all nicotine users and 22 verified controls to determine urinary levels of putatively nicotine product-specific substances; propylene glycol, 2-cyanoethylmercapturic acid (CEMA), and anabasine. 1) Cigarette smoking was associated with a dose dependent demethylation of cg05575921 and increased urinary CEMA and anabasine levels, 2) e-cigarette use did not demethylate cg05575921, 3) smokeless tobacco use also did not demethylate cg05575921 but was positively associated with anabasine levels 4) CEMA and cg05575921 levels were highly correlated and 5) propylene glycol levels did not reliably distinguish use groups. Cg05575921 assessments distinguish exposure to tobacco smoke from smokeless sources of nicotine including e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco, neither of which are associated with cg05575921 demethylation. A combination of methylomic and metabolite profiling may allow for accurate classification use status of a variety of nicotine containing products

    Appalachian Studies Anachronisms: A Roundtable Discussion

    No full text
    Since its inception in the 1970s, Appalachian Studies scholars and activists have worked to mediate, and at times rebuke, the region’s romanticized and stereotyped characterizations. And yet the very concept of a field of Appalachian studies inherently argues for an exclusivity and uniqueness that easily reinforces those romanticized notions. As this field of study enters its fifth decade, voices across this discipline are calling for recognition of Appalachia’s politically, economically and ethnically diverse histories, advocating for the field to continue to develop an interdisciplinary identity. Our question is whether “Appalachia” is a term under which these histories can truly be recognized, or whether the term itself can only inherently peripheralize and obscure these realities. To explore this question a roundtable hosted by ETSU Appalachian Studies graduate students will briefly present 8 themes or topics that have been historically characterized as unique to Appalachia. Participants will then discuss how these themes characterize the region, obscure its history, and/or can be applied to other national or global experiences. In the introduction to the collection Studying Appalachian Studies (2015), Chad Berry, Phillip Obermiller and Shaunna Scott state, “It is not useful to think of the Appalachian region as exceptional and distinctive but, rather, to scrutinize its similarity and connection to other places…charting a middle course between an overgeneralized universalism and an exclusionary individualism…is clearly no easy task.” This conversation will help explore the challenges and strengths of charting that middle course, and raise questions about the many paths the field can take at its next stage of evolution

    TABLE 4 from Disparities in Access to Liver Transplant Referral and Evaluation among Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Georgia

    No full text
    Multivariable adjusted probability of transplant referral, evaluation initiation, and evaluation completion among patients with early-stage HCC in Georgia, accounting for death as a competing risk</p
    corecore