Avaliação do extrato hidroalcoólico de Aroeira (Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi) no processo de cicatrização de feridas em pele de ratos Evaluation of hydroalcoholic extract of Aroeira (Shinus Terebinthifolius Raddi) in the healing process of wound skin in rats

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o efeito cicatrizante da administração tópica do extrato hidroalcoólico de aroeira em feridas abertas na região dorsocostal de ratos. MÉTODOS: Utilizou-se 60 ratos Wistar, machos, que tiveram retirado fragmentos de pele com dois centímetros de diâmetro, sob anestesia inalatória com éter etílico. Foram divididos em dois grupos de 30 animais: o grupo aroeira, que recebeu aplicação do extrato hidroalcoólico da planta, e o grupo controle, que recebeu aplicação de solução salina a 0,9%. Cada grupo foi subdividido em 3 com 10 animais cada para serem observados aos sete, 14 ou 21 dias. As áreas das lesões foram analisadas pelo aspecto macroscópico e por planimetria digital. Os espécimes ressecados das feridas foram analisados por microscopia ótica em colorações de hematoxilina-eosina e tricrômio de Masson. RESULTADOS: Os achados macroscópicos demonstraram reepitelização completa mais precoce no grupo controle aos 14 dias. Pela planimetria digital as áreas médias das feridas dos ratos do grupo controle (0,5278 cm²) foram menores que as das feridas dos ratos do grupo aroeira (0,6897 cm²), com significância estatística aos 14 dias de pós-operatório (p=0,036). O estudo histológico demonstrou diferença estatística (p=0,023) em relação às células mononucleares no 14º dia de avaliação, com maior número no grupo aroeira, não havendo diferenças significantes em relação aos outros parâmetros em nenhum dos dias estudados. CONCLUSÃO: O extrato hidroalcoólico de aroeira retardou a reepitelização das feridas da pele dos ratos.<br>PURPOSE: To evaluate the healing effect of the topic administration of the hydroalcoholic extract of aroeira in open wounds in the dorsocostal region of rats. METHODS: Sixty Wistar rats, males, were used. In all animals one skin fragment was removed, with two centimeters in diameter. Inhalatory anesthesia with ethyl ether was done, The rats were divided in two groups of 30 animals: aroeira group, submitted to an topic application of the hydralcoholic extract of the plant, and control group, with the same process but with 0.9% saline solution. Each group was divided in three sub-groups of 10 animals according to the period of observation: 7, 14 and 21 days. The areas of the injuries were analyzed by the macrocospic aspect and digital planimetry, and the resected segments of the wounds were studied by optic microscopy stainned with hematoxilin-eosine and trichromium of Masson. RESULTS: The macrocospic findings showed early complete reepitelization in the control group by the 14th day. According to the digital planimetry the average wound areas of the rats from the control group (0.5278 cm²) had been smaller than those from the wounds of the rats of the aroeira group (0.6897 cm²), with statistical significance to the 14th day (p=0.036). The hystologic study showed statistical difference (p=0.023) regarding the mononuclear cells in 14th day of evaluation, with larger number in the aroeira group, without significant differences regarding other parameters in all the remaining days. CONCLUSION: The topic use of the hydralcoholic extract of aroeira delayed the reepitelization of the skin wounds in rats

Resumos concluídos - Medicina

Resumos concluídos - Medicin

Outcomes in Newly Diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation and History of Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights from GARFIELD-AF

BACKGROUND: Many patients with atrial fibrillation have concomitant coronary artery disease with or without acute coronary syndromes and are in need of additional antithrombotic therapy. There are few data on the long-term clinical outcome of atrial fibrillation patients with a history of acute coronary syndrome. This is a 2-year study of atrial fibrillation patients with or without a history of acute coronary syndromes

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct autophagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field