628 research outputs found
Normative Alethic Pluralism
Some philosophers have argued that truth is a norm of judgement and have provided a variety of formulations of this general thesis. In this paper, I shall side with these philosophers and assume that truth is a norm of judgement. What I am primarily interested in here are two core questions concerning the judgement-truth norm: (i) what are the normative relationships between truth and judgement? And (ii) do these relationships vary or are they constant? I argue for a pluralist picture—what I call Normative Alethic Pluralism (NAP)—according to which (i) there is more than one correct judgement-truth norm and (ii) the normative relationships between truth and judgement vary in relation to the subject matter of the judgement. By means of a comparative analysis of disagreement in three areas of the evaluative domain—refined aesthetics, basic taste and morality—I show that there is an important variability in the normative significance of disagreement—I call this the variability conjecture. By presenting a variation of Lynch’s scope problem for alethic monism, I argue that a monistic approach to the normative function of truth is unable to vindicate the conjecture. I then argue that normative alethic pluralism provides us with a promising model to account for it
Does a Computer have an Arrow of Time?
In [Sch05a], it is argued that Boltzmann's intuition, that the psychological
arrow of time is necessarily aligned with the thermodynamic arrow, is correct.
Schulman gives an explicit physical mechanism for this connection, based on the
brain being representable as a computer, together with certain thermodynamic
properties of computational processes. [Haw94] presents similar, if briefer,
arguments. The purpose of this paper is to critically examine the support for
the link between thermodynamics and an arrow of time for computers. The
principal arguments put forward by Schulman and Hawking will be shown to fail.
It will be shown that any computational process that can take place in an
entropy increasing universe, can equally take place in an entropy decreasing
universe. This conclusion does not automatically imply a psychological arrow
can run counter to the thermodynamic arrow. Some alternative possible explana-
tions for the alignment of the two arrows will be briefly discussed.Comment: 31 pages, no figures, publication versio
Gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone for the treatment of patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma: the Royal Marsden Hospital experience
Personalizing, not patronizing: the case for patient autonomy by unbiased presentation of management options in stage I testicular cancer
Testicular cancer (TC) is the most common neoplasm in males aged 15 to 40 years and approximately 65%-75% have clinical stage I (CSI) disease. Both surveillance and adjuvant chemotherapy may be applied with indistinguishable long-term survival rates. Therefore, the patient should decide based on risk factors and potential benefits and harms rather than adopting a uniform recommendation for al
- …