Value of dermoscopy in a population-based screening sample by dermatologists

Background: The use of dermoscopy improves the diagnosis of skin cancer significantly in trained dermatologists. However, to evaluate its cost-effectiveness in daily practice, not only sensitivity but also the excision rate is important. Objective: We examined the diagnostic accuracy of cases from a true population-based sample scored by general dermatologists. Methods: One hundred twenty-six dermatologists were randomly assigned to 145 digital cases of lesions detected at a skin cancer screening. This resulted in 4,655 case evaluations using a web application. Accuracy of diagnosis and treatment was correlated with the histological diagnosis or expert opinion. Results: The larger portion (89.7%) of the participating dermatologists reported using their dermatoscope daily. The odds of making a correct diagnosis of melanoma using dermoscopy was 5.38 compared with naked-eye examination (NEE). Dermoscopy increased sensitivity for skin cancer diagnosis from 70.6% to 84.6%, but this was associated with a small but significant decrease in specificity of 3.5%. To detect 1 skin cancer, 5.23 lesions had to be biopsied/excised in this sample and this was not significantly improved by dermoscopic evaluation. Dermoscopy significantly increased the confidence about making a correct diagnosis, especially in seborrheic keratosis, Bowen disease, and melanoma. Conclusions: Dermoscopy significantly improved diagnostic accuracy, the sensitivity of skin cancer detection, and the confidence in diagnosis especially for seborrheic keratosis, Bowen disease, and melanoma. However, this finding was not reflected in a significant reduction in the number needed to excise in this sample

Modulation of the unfolded protein response by tauroursodeoxycholic acid counteracts apoptotic cell death and fibrosis in a mouse model for secondary biliary liver fibrosis

The role of endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) in cholestatic liver disease and fibrosis is not fully unraveled. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA), a hydrophilic bile acid, has been shown to reduce endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress and counteract apoptosis in different pathologies. We aimed to investigate the therapeutic potential of TUDCA in experimental secondary biliary liver fibrosis in mice, induced by common bile duct ligation. The kinetics of the hepatic UPR and apoptosis during the development of biliary fibrosis was studied by measuring markers at six different timepoints post-surgery by qPCR and Western blot. Next, we investigated the therapeutic potential of TUDCA, 10 mg/kg/day in drinking water, on liver damage (AST/ALT levels) and fibrosis (Sirius red-staining), in both a preventive and therapeutic setting. Common bile duct ligation resulted in the increased protein expression of CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein homologous protein (CHOP) at all timepoints, along with upregulation of pro-apoptotic caspase 3 and 12, tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 1A (TNFRsf1a) and Fas-Associated protein with Death Domain (FADD) expression. Treatment with TUDCA led to a significant reduction of liver fibrosis, accompanied by a slight reduction of liver damage, decreased hepatic protein expression of CHOP and reduced gene and protein expression of pro-apoptotic markers. These data indicate that TUDCA exerts a beneficial effect on liver fibrosis in a model of cholestatic liver disease, and suggest that this effect might, at least in part, be attributed to decreased hepatic UPR signaling and apoptotic cell death

Comparison of ex vivo and in vivo dermoscopy in dermatopathologic evaluation of skin tumors

IMPORTANCE: Ex vivo dermoscopy (EVD) can be a valuable tool in routine diagnostic dermatopathologic evaluation. OBJECTIVES: To compare in vivo dermoscopy (IVD) and EVD and to provide guidance for routine dermatopathologic evaluations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational study collected 101 consecutive IVD and EVD images of skin tumors from a private dermatology practice from March 1 to September 30, 2013. Four observers (3 dermatologists and 1 dermatopathologist) blinded to the histopathologic diagnoses independently scored and compared the colors, structures, and vessels of EVD images with those of the corresponding IVD images. Data were analyzed from January 1 to March 31, 2014. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Concordance between the EVD and IVD images and gain or loss of colors, structures, and vessels on EVD relative to IVD images. RESULTS: The final analysis included 404 observations of 101 images. The EVD image was generally similar to the corresponding IVD image but clearly darker, with new areas of blue in 130 of 404 observations (32.2%) and white in 100 of 404 observations (24.8%) and loss of red in 283 of 404 observations (70.0%). Most structures were well preserved. New structureless areas were found in 78 of 404 observations of EVD images (19.3%), and new crystalline structures were detected in 68 of 404 observations of EVD images (16.8%). On EVD images, squames and crusts were lost in 56 of 404 observations (13.9%) and 43 of 404 observations (10.6%), respectively. Blood vessels were lost in 142 of 404 observations of EVD images (35.1%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The EVD image is an important new tool in dermatopathology and may give direction to targeted tissue processing and examination of skin tumors

Comparison of methods to estimate the affected body surface area and the dosage of topical treatments in psoriasis and atopic dermatitis : the advantage of a picture‐based tool

Background: The accurate determination of the dosage of topical treatments is important given its repercussions on patient adherence and therapeutic efficacy. Up till now, the fingertip unit calculated by the rule of hands is considered the gold standard, although its use is associated with several drawbacks. Objective: To compare different methods to estimate the affected body surface area (BSA) and dosage of topical treatments in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis and investigate its reliability, user-friendliness and timing. Methods: In this study, we compared the reliability of three different methods: (i) the fingertip unit calculated by the 1% hand rule; (ii) a picture-based tool [termed Cutaneous Inflammatory Disease Extent Score (CIDES)]; and (iii) a digital drawing tool. Eleven observers scored 40 patients with psoriasis and eczema to assess the inter-rater and intrarater reliability. Timing was automatically recorded, and user-friendliness was investigated by a questionnaire. Results: An excellent intraclass correlation (ICC) was found for both inter-rater agreement and intrarater agreement for the picture-based tool (ICC = 0.92 and ICC = 0.96, respectively). The ICCs for drawing the area of involvement on a silhouette were 0.89 and 0.93, respectively. Finally, the rule of hands was associated with an increased inter-rater variability although an excellent intrarater agreement was found (ICC = 0.79 and 0.95, respectively). Automated calculation of the amount of topical treatment improved reliability, and CIDES was associated with the least variation. CIDES was considered the preferred method by all observers and was fast to perform (median: 30 s). Conclusion: A picture-based method offered the most advantages (in terms of reliability, speed and user-friendliness) to estimate the affected BSA and calculate the dosage of topical treatments

Lesion‐directed screening to optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice : an observational study

Background Early detection of skin cancer is still a major challenge in dermatology practice today. While surveillance programs are offered to high-risk patients, systematic total-body examination (TBE) in the general population is not cost-effective. In the past, we demonstrated that a lesion-directed screening (LDS) in the general population delivered similar detection rates to TBE and was less time-consuming. Objectives To study whether a lesion-directed early-access consultation can optimize skin cancer detection in dermatology practice. Methods In this observational study, we offered an early-access consultation in patients contacting the dermatology department concerning 1 or 2 lesions of concern meeting predefined criteria. Results 342 persons were seen at the dermatology department after triage by phone. Skin cancer detection rate was 13.2% (4.1% for melanoma). If advised/referred by a doctor skin cancer detection rate was 23.6% (9% for melanoma). With a history of skin cancer, detection rate was 24.3% (4.3% for melanoma). In patients with no referral and a negative history of skin cancer, detection rate was 7.7% (1.7% for melanoma), which is at least triple the rates reported by population-based screening programs. In patients in whom the index lesion was benign, worry of having skin cancer had decreased significantly by the end of the consultation. Additional total-body examination in these patients had low additional detection rate (0.5%) and a high number of unnecessary excisions (number needed to excise 13). Conclusions An early-access dermatology consultation for LDS after triage by phone resulted in high overall skin cancer and melanoma detection rates. Our data indicate that performing TBE is especially useful if the index lesion is suspicious. In addition to surveillance programs in high-risk patients, LDS may be a way to optimize skin cancer detection in the general population and use available time more efficiently in daily dermatology practice

Skin cancers are the most frequent cancers in fair-skinned populations, but we can prevent them

: Cancers of the skin are the most commonly occurring cancers in humans. In fair-skinned populations, up to 95% of keratinocyte skin cancers and 70-95% of cutaneous melanomas are caused by ultraviolet radiation and are thus theoretically preventable. Currently, however, there is no comprehensive global advice on practical steps to be taken to reduce the toll of skin cancer. To address this gap, an expert working group comprising clinicians and researchers from Africa, America, Asia, Australia, and Europe, together with learned societies (European Association of Dermato-Oncology, Euromelanoma, Euroskin, European Union of Medical Specialists, and the Melanoma World Society) reviewed the extant evidence and issued the following evidence-based recommendations for photoprotection as a strategy to prevent skin cancer. Fair skinned people, especially children, should minimise their exposure to ultraviolet radiation, and are advised to use protective measures when the UV index is forecast to reach 3 or higher. Protective measures include a combination of seeking shade, physical protection (e.g. clothing, hat, sunglasses), and applying broad-spectrum, SPF 30 + sunscreens to uncovered skin. Intentional exposure to solar ultraviolet radiation for the purpose of sunbathing and tanning is considered an unhealthy behaviour and should be avoided. Similarly, use of solaria and other artificial sources of ultraviolet radiation to encourage tanning should be strongly discouraged, through regulation if necessary. Primary prevention of skin cancer has a positive return on investment. We encourage policymakers to communicate these messages to the general public and promote their wider implementation

Man against machine reloaded : performance of a market-approved convolutional neural network in classifying a broad spectrum of skin lesions in comparison with 96 dermatologists working under less artificial conditions

Copyright © 2019 European Society for Medical Oncology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Background: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) efficiently differentiate skin lesions by image analysis. Studies comparing a market-approved CNN in a broad range of diagnoses to dermatologists working under less artificial conditions are lacking. Materials and methods: One hundred cases of pigmented/non-pigmented skin cancers and benign lesions were used for a two-level reader study in 96 dermatologists (level I: dermoscopy only; level II: clinical close-up images, dermoscopy, and textual information). Additionally, dermoscopic images were classified by a CNN approved for the European market as a medical device (Moleanalyzer Pro, FotoFinder Systems, Bad Birnbach, Germany). Primary endpoints were the sensitivity and specificity of the CNN's dichotomous classification in comparison with the dermatologists’ management decisions. Secondary endpoints included the dermatologists’ diagnostic decisions, their performance according to their level of experience, and the CNN's area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Results: The CNN revealed a sensitivity, specificity, and ROC AUC with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of 95.0% (95% CI 83.5% to 98.6%), 76.7% (95% CI 64.6% to 85.6%), and 0.918 (95% CI 0.866–0.970), respectively. In level I, the dermatologists’ management decisions showed a mean sensitivity and specificity of 89.0% (95% CI 87.4% to 90.6%) and 80.7% (95% CI 78.8% to 82.6%). With level II information, the sensitivity significantly improved to 94.1% (95% CI 93.1% to 95.1%; P < 0.001), while the specificity remained unchanged at 80.4% (95% CI 78.4% to 82.4%; P = 0.97). When fixing the CNN's specificity at the mean specificity of the dermatologists’ management decision in level II (80.4%), the CNN's sensitivity was almost equal to that of human raters, at 95% (95% CI 83.5% to 98.6%) versus 94.1% (95% CI 93.1% to 95.1%); P = 0.1. In contrast, dermatologists were outperformed by the CNN in their level I management decisions and level I and II diagnostic decisions. More experienced dermatologists frequently surpassed the CNN's performance. Conclusions: Under less artificial conditions and in a broader spectrum of diagnoses, the CNN and most dermatologists performed on the same level. Dermatologists are trained to integrate information from a range of sources rendering comparative studies that are solely based on one single case image inadequate.publishersversionPeer reviewe

The Value of Teledermatology Advice for Anti-EGFR-related Skin Toxicity: a Pilot Study (Preprint)

UNSTRUCTURED Despite skin toxicity during anti-EGFR therapy occurs frequently and significantly impacts patients’ quality of life, it is often not recognized nor optimally managed. This may lead to unnecessary dose reductions or treatment discontinuations of the cancer treatment. Access to rapid dermatology advice may be limited in hospitals. In this multicenter pilot study, we conclude that teledermatology may add value for both patients and oncologists in the management of treatment-induced skin toxicity. </sec