19 research outputs found

    Infants’ social evaluation abilities: testing their preference for prosocial agents at 6, 12 and 18 months with different social scenarios

    Get PDF
    International audienceA recent body of research suggests infants prefer prosocial behaviours. However, some studies failed to report this preference, and asked what specific parameters allow to observe it. We attempt to provide a part of answer to that question by investigating if the preference vary 1) with age (testing infants aged 6, 12, 18 months), 2) with the type of social behaviours (help, play and share), and 3) when the pro-and antisocial agents' appearance were manipulated (i.e., displaying neutral, own-race or other-race faces). To this end, we use an eye-tracking methodology to assess infants' preference between pro-and antisocial agents featured in animated cartoons. We found that the prosocial preference was not stable across ages and varied depending on social scenarios. No sound conclusion could be given about the influence of faces. Our results invite to wonder in which extent very young infants perceive the prosociality in complex social behaviours

    Abstracts from the Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Meeting 2016

    Get PDF

    Is infants' preference for prosocial behaviors strong? : experimental and eye-tracking studies at 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36 months

    No full text
    En 2007, une Ă©tude menĂ©e par Hamlin, Wynn et Bloom a montrĂ© qu’à 6 mois les jeunes enfants disposent de capacitĂ©s d’évaluation sociale, qui s’illustrent dans leur prĂ©fĂ©rence pour des personnages prosociaux. Depuis, de nombreuses Ă©tudes ont tentĂ© de retrouver la prĂ©fĂ©rence pour un personnage prosocial. Parmi elles, certaines n’ont pas retrouvĂ© ce rĂ©sultat, questionnant la soliditĂ© de ces capacitĂ©s.L’objectif de cette thĂšse est de tester l’existence et la robustesse de la prĂ©fĂ©rence pour un comportement prosocial chez les jeunes enfants en manipulant : 1) l’ñge (6, 12, 18, 24, 36 mois), le type de scĂ©nario social (aide, jeu, partage), et l’apparence faciale des agents prosociaux et antisociaux (familiĂšre ou inhabituelle). Dans cet objectif, quatre Ă©tudes ont Ă©tĂ© rĂ©alisĂ©es auprĂšs de 446 enfants ĂągĂ©s de 6 Ă  36 mois qui ont visionnĂ© des dessins animĂ©s faisant interagir des agents prosociaux et antisociaux. Leurs prĂ©fĂ©rences ont Ă©tĂ© identifiĂ©es par un geste de pointage/atteinte ou Ă  l’aide d’un oculomĂštre.Nos rĂ©sultats montrent que la prĂ©fĂ©rence pour un comportement prosocial est observĂ©e quasiment Ă  tous les Ăąges testĂ©s, et varie en fonction du scĂ©nario social. Enfin, dans les situations sensĂ©es ĂȘtre conflictuelles au regard des prĂ©fĂ©rences des jeunes enfants, ces derniers n’expriment majoritairement pas de prĂ©fĂ©rence. L’ensemble des rĂ©sultats remettent en question la soliditĂ© d’une prĂ©fĂ©rence prĂ©coce pour un comportement prosocial et questionnent les conditions nĂ©cessaires Ă  son observation. Les rĂ©sultats de cette thĂšse sont discutĂ©s Ă  la lumiĂšre de questionnements mĂ©thodologiques et d’études rĂ©centes qui fragilisent les rĂ©sultats princeps d’Hamlin et ses collaborateurs.In 2007, a study carried out by Hamlin, Wynn, and Bloom showed that infants aged 6 months are able to make social evaluation, that could be identified through their preference for prosocial characters. Since, a number of studies have tried to confirm this preference for prosocial characters. Of these, some did not find similar result, raising question on the robustness of this ability.This dissertation aims to test the existence and the strength of the preference for prosocial behaviors in infants by manipulating: 1) age (6, 12, 18, 24 and 36 months), the type of the social scenario (help, play, share), and the facial appearance of the prosocial and antisocial agents (familiar or unusual). To that end, four studies have been carried out with 446 infants aged 6 to 36 months who were shown specially designed animated cartoons in which prosocial and antisocial agents interacted. Infants’ preference was identified through their pointing/reaching gesture or assessed by an eye-tracker. Our results show that the preference for the prosocial behaviors was observed in nearly all the tested age, and varied according to the social scenario. Finally, in the situation assumed to be conflicting infants' preferences, infants mostly did not express any preference. All results challenge the strength of the preference for prosocial behaviors as well as the conditions that must be met to observe it. The results of this dissertation are discussed in the light of methodological issues and recent studies that weaken Hamlin and collaborators’ original results

    Further evidence for infants' preference for prosocial over antisocial behaviors

    No full text
    International audienceThis study extends the findings that young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others (Hamlin, Wynn, & Bloom, 2007; Hamlin & Wynn, 2011) to older infants (12-to-24 months, and 24-to-36 months) with a novel display. We presented infants with short cartoons in which a character (the « Protoganist ») engaged in a ball play with two others, one acting prosocially (the « Giver »), and the other antisocially (the « Keeper »). Afterwards, infants were presented with the Giver and the Keeper characters and encouraged to reach for the one of their choice. We found that infants exhibited robust choice for the Giver. In addition, infants' preference for the Giver persisted despite changes in facial features (dark skin, scrambled face). These findings provide further evidence for infant's preference for prosociality

    Further evidence for infants' preference for prosocial over antisocial behaviors

    No full text
    International audienceThis study extends the findings that young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others (Hamlin, Wynn, & Bloom, 2007; Hamlin & Wynn, 2011) to older infants (12-to-24 months, and 24-to-36 months) with a novel display. We presented infants with short cartoons in which a character (the « Protoganist ») engaged in a ball play with two others, one acting prosocially (the « Giver »), and the other antisocially (the « Keeper »). Afterwards, infants were presented with the Giver and the Keeper characters and encouraged to reach for the one of their choice. We found that infants exhibited robust choice for the Giver. In addition, infants' preference for the Giver persisted despite changes in facial features (dark skin, scrambled face). These findings provide further evidence for infant's preference for prosociality

    Infants preference for prosocial behaviors: A literature review

    No full text
    International audienceIn 2007, a study carried out by Hamlin, Wynn, and Bloom provided concrete evidence that infants as young as 6 months were capable of social evaluation, displaying an early preference for agents performing a prosocial behavior. Since then the development of early social abilities to judge other's behavior has been the topic of a growing body of research. The present paper reviews studies conducted between 2007 and 2015 that experimentally examined infants' social evaluation abilities by testing their preference for agents acting prosocially. We performed a detailed analysis of a corpus of 16 research studies including 59 experimental results, scrutinizing their methods and findings, and identifying their convergent and divergent features. This analysis showed that a preference for agents who perform prosocial behaviors (as opposed to antisocial or neutral) was present in a majority of infants, but some conflicting results have also been reported. The rich interpretation that infants are endowed with mature socio-moral evaluation abilities has not really been sufficiently discussed. In order to deepen this debate, we assessed other studies that have further explored infants' understanding of the social value of behaviors. Many of the studies provide evidence that young infants manage to identify and prefer the prosocial agent by taking into account the context and agents' mental states beyond the behavior itself. In this study two specific areas are assessed: (1) studies that have previously explored social evaluation abilities beyond a basic preference for prosocial behavior and (2) current theories which attempt to explain how and why such preferences could exist so early in infancy. Future directions for research on social evaluation abilities in infants are also discussed as well as a review of the literature
    corecore