An Evaluation of Leafspot Advisory and Integrated Pest Management Adoption Among Peanut Farmers in Northampton County, North Carolina

Leafspot advisory (LSA) is an integrated pest management (IPM) strategy designed to reduce the number of sprays necessary to control the spread of the peanut leafspotting pathogen, Cercospora arachidicola. It is in use in nine North Carolina counties and has been used in Northampton County since 1983. Thirty-one peanut farmers were interviewed over the telephone to determine the level of LSA and IPM adoption in Northampton County. The survey revealed that 52 percent of the farmers used the advisory, saving an average of 2.4 sprays/year. Only 32 percent used other IPM strategies. The level of farmer concern about the harmful effects of pesticides was also measured. Farmers were worried about the effects of pesticides on fish and wildlife but their level of concern was not found to be associated with the adoption of pesticide reducing technologies. LSA, as one IPM strategy, was found to be successfully implemented in comparison to a complete IPM program, but, extension specialists can make improvements. Recommendations are made for increasing the percentage of farmers adopting pest management innovations.Master of Science in Public Healt

Designing an Egocentric Video-Based Dashboard to Report Hand Performance Measures for Outpatient Rehabilitation of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Background: Functional use of the upper extremities (UEs) is a top recovery priority for individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI), but the inability to monitor recovery at home and limitations in hand function outcome measures impede optimal recovery. Objectives: We developed a framework using wearable cameras to monitor hand use at home and aimed to identify the best way to report information to clinicians. Methods: A dashboard was iteratively developed with clinician (n = 7) input through focus groups and interviews, creating low-fidelity prototypes based on recurring feedback until no new information emerged. Affinity diagramming was used to identify themes and subthemes from interview data. User stories were developed and mapped to specific features to create a high-fidelity prototype. Results: Useful elements identified for a dashboard reporting hand performance included summaries to interpret graphs, a breakdown of hand posture and activity to provide context, video snippets to qualitatively view hand use at home, patient notes to understand patient satisfaction or struggles, and time series graphing of metrics to measure trends over time. Conclusion: Involving end-users in the design process and breaking down user requirements into user stories helped identify necessary interface elements for reporting hand performance metrics to clinicians. Clinicians recognized the dashboard's potential to monitor rehabilitation progress, provide feedback on hand use, and track progress over time. Concerns were raised about the implementation into clinical practice, therefore further inquiry is needed to determine the tool's feasibility and usefulness in clinical practice for individuals with UE impairments

A roadmap to engaging patients in research: The experience of a large academic research hospital in Canada

Recent definitions of patient engagement in research (PER) emphasize that engagement should be meaningful, active and an equal collaboration across the research continuum. The increased interest in patient engagement is predicated on the recognition by researchers of the unique experiential knowledge provided by individuals with lived experience, ethical obligations to democratize science and that patient involvement can potentially lead to improved outcomes for patients and researchers. Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center is a large academic research hospital in Toronto, Canada which aimed to create clearer pathways for patients to have a more prominent voice in the development, implementation, and dissemination of research. However, to ensure that the policies, practices and resources to support PER would be viewed as meaningful to all stakeholders (including, but not limited to, administrators, clinicians, clinician researchers, scientists, patients, family members and caregivers), a series of structured activities were undertaken to foster collective buy-in and co-create an operational implementation plan for PER. The activities consisted of a consecutive mixed methods approach of three phases of discovery: a survey, focus groups and interviews, and an in-person town hall. We describe our approach to implementation and operationalization of PER at an academic hospital based on five identified priority themes: education and training, partnerships, matching programs, policies and measures. Experience Framework This article is associated with the Patient, Family & Community Engagement lens of The Beryl Institute Experience Framework (https://www.theberylinstitute.org/ExperienceFramework). Access other PXJ articles related to this lens. Access other resources related to this lens

Impact of Falls and Fear of Falling on Participation, Autonomy and Life Satisfaction in the First Year After Spinal Cord Injury

IntroductionIndividuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) experience reduced participation in meaningful activities, leading to reduced social engagement and negative psychological impact. Two factors that may affect participation post-SCI are fall status (e.g., having experienced a fall) and having a fear of falling. Our objective was to examine if and how fall status and fear of falling impact participation, autonomy and life satisfaction in the first year post-injury.MethodsAdult inpatients of a SCI rehabilitation hospital were recruited. Following discharge, falls were tracked for 6 months and participants who fell at least once were categorized as “fallers”. At the end of the 6-month period, the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire and Life Satisfaction Questionnaire 9 were administered, and participants were asked if they had a fear of falling (i.e., an ongoing concern about falling leading to the avoidance of activities they are capable of doing). Falls were reported using descriptive statistics. Ordinary least squares regression was used to evaluate the relationships between the independent variables (i.e., fall status and fear of falling) and each dependent variable (i.e., questionnaire scores).ResultsSeventy-one individuals were enrolled in the study; however, 11 participants were lost to follow-up. The included participants (n = 60) were 58.4 ± 14.6 years old and 99 ± 60.3 days post-injury. Over one third (38.3%) of participants fell over the 6-month tracking period. Twenty-seven participants (45%) reported a fear of falling and 14 (51.9%) of these participants were fallers. Fear of falling significantly predicted scores of autonomy indoors (β = 3.38, p = 0.04), autonomy outdoors (β = 2.62, p = 0.04) and family role (β = 3.52, p = 0.05).ConclusionIndividuals with subacute SCI and a fear of falling experienced reduced participation and autonomy, but with no differences in life satisfaction compared to those without a fear of falling. In contrast, having experienced a fall did not impact participation, autonomy or life satisfaction. In the first year after SCI, rehabilitation programs should place specific attention on the presence of fear of falling to help individuals with SCI prepare for everyday mobility challenges

Theorising rehabilitation: Actors and parameters shaping normality, liminality and depersonalisation in a UK hospital.

Sociological concern for rehabilitation remains limited. This paper aims to contribute to rehabilitation theory. It examines two units of a specialist rehabilitation hospital in the UK (amputee and neurological services) by focusing on the key actors involved - families, patients, staff - and the parameters shaping their relationships. The findings extend previous theoretical understandings of rehabilitation in three themes: normality, liminality and depersonalisation. We argue, first: normality is constantly negotiated amongst the different actors. This complicates existing works' critique of rehabilitation as reproducing the ideology of normality. Second, discourses produced during acute care shape the inpatient rehabilitation experience. This calls attention to the pre-rehabilitation phase and complicates existing works' emphasis on the transition from inpatient stay to the time of discharge. Finally, inpatient rehabilitation is notable in rendering the adverse effects of depersonalisation apparent. It combines the bureaucracy of a regular hospital ward, with institutionalising aspects of long-term care. These findings have a potential to enhance practice as well as knowledge. We call for a deeper sociological attention, combining theory-building with empirical data for a better understanding of inpatient rehabilitation