Organism -sediment interactions: The role of seabed dynamics in structuring the mesohaline York River macrobenthic community

Estuaries are dynamic physical environments. The stability of the sediment-water interface is influenced by sources and rates of sediment delivery and physical reworking of sediments by currents, tides, waves and biology, but effects of disruption of this interface on benthic biology are poorly resolved. For this study, I investigated effects of prevalent gradients in seabed disturbance processes and associated seabed characteristics on estuarine benthic community structure and function in the mesohaline York River, a tributary of Chesapeake Bay, USA. I used a variety of approaches to characterize the seabed, including sediment grain size, sediment water content, maximum depth of 7Be, depth of the oxidized sediment layer, profiles of sediment Eh, physical structure of the sediment, sediment chlorophyll a, and sediment organic content. Differences in magnitude of deposition and subsequent reworking of sediments by physical processes were documented among the five benthic subenvironments sampled (south shoal, secondary channel, main channel flank, main channel, and north shoal). Temporal and spatial variations in spring recruitment were observed among subenvironments sampled weekly for recruits: the south shoal, secondary channel and main channel flank. Total recruitment was greatest in the main channel flank, which experienced the highest sediment deposition, and was limited in the secondary channel, which had the strongest tidal currents. The five benthic subenvironments sampled for patterns of community structure and estimates of secondary production were dominated by estuarine opportunist species. Total abundance was greatest in the north shoal, which experienced minimal deposition and physical reworking of sediment. Biomass and secondary production estimates were driven by presence of deep-dwelling bivalves, and were greatest in subenvironments that experienced deposition. These results suggest that variations in seabed characteristics across relatively small spatial scales can influence estuarine benthic community structure and function. Laboratory experiments were conducted to further elucidate the effect of sediment deposition on estuarine organism survival. Species representing both infaunal and epifaunal taxa ranged from highly susceptible to highly tolerant of burial by sediment. Survival was a function of organism motility, residence depth and perhaps physiological adaptations. Small, shallow-dwelling juveniles of some common estuarine species were highly tolerant of burial

Density data for Lake Ontario benthic invertebrate assemblages from 1964 to 2018

Benthic invertebrates are important trophic links in aquatic food webs and serve as useful bioindicators of environmental conditions because their responses integrate the effects of both water and sediment qualities. However, long-term data sets for benthic invertebrate assemblages across broad geographic areas are rare and, even if collected, historic data sets are often not readily accessible. This data set provides densities of benthic macroinvertebrates for all taxa collected during lake-wide surveys in Lake Ontario, a Laurentian Great Lake, from 1964 to 2018. This information resulted from surveys funded by the governments of the United States and Canada to investigate the status and changes of Lake Ontario benthic community. Of the 13 lake-wide benthic surveys conducted in Lake Ontario over the course of 54 yr, we were able to acquire taxonomic data to the species level for 11 of the surveys and data to the group level for the other two surveys. Density data are provided for taxa representing the Annelida, Arthropoda, Mollusca, Cnidaria, Nemertea, and Platyhelminthes phyla. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that the compositional structure of Lake Ontario invertebrate assemblages differed markedly by depth and were also significantly altered by the Dreissena spp. invasion in early 1990s. The introduction of invasive dreissenids has changed the community historically dominated by Diporeia, Oligochaeta, and Sphaeriidae, to a community dominated by quagga mussels and Oligochaeta. Considering the rarity of long-term benthic data of high taxonomic resolution in lake ecosystems, this data set could be useful to explore broader aspects of ecological theory, including effects of different environmental factors and invasive species on community organization, functional and phylogenetic diversity, and spatial scale of variation in community structure. The data set could also be useful for studies on individual species including abundance and distribution, species co-occurrence, and how the patterns of dominance and rarity change over space and time. Use of this data set for academic or educational purposes is encouraged as long as the data source is properly cited using the title of this Data Paper, the names of the authors, the year of publication, the journal name, and the article number

The Changing Face of Winter: Lessons and Questions From the Laurentian Great Lakes

Among its many impacts, climate warming is leading to increasing winter air temperatures, decreasing ice cover extent, and changing winter precipitation patterns over the Laurentian Great Lakes and their watershed. Understanding and predicting the consequences of these changes is impeded by a shortage of winter-period studies on most aspects of Great Lake limnology. In this review, we summarize what is known about the Great Lakes during their 3–6 months of winter and identify key open questions about the physics, chemistry, and biology of the Laurentian Great Lakes and other large, seasonally frozen lakes. Existing studies show that winter conditions have important effects on physical, biogeochemical, and biological processes, not only during winter but in subsequent seasons as well. Ice cover, the extent of which fluctuates dramatically among years and the five lakes, emerges as a key variable that controls many aspects of the functioning of the Great Lakes ecosystem. Studies on the properties and formation of Great Lakes ice, its effect on vertical and horizontal mixing, light conditions, and biota, along with winter measurements of fundamental state and rate parameters in the lakes and their watersheds are needed to close the winter knowledge gap. Overcoming the formidable logistical challenges of winter research on these large and dynamic ecosystems may require investment in new, specialized research infrastructure. Perhaps more importantly, it will demand broader recognition of the value of such work and collaboration between physicists, geochemists, and biologists working on the world\u27s seasonally freezing lakes and seas

Introduction to the special section: Status and approaches to assess Lake Erie Central Basin hypoxia

Seasonal hypolimnetic hypoxia has occurred in Lake Erie\u27s central basin since at least the 1950s. The 2012 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement includes a lake ecosystem objective that commits Canada and the United States to minimize the extent of hypoxic zones, with a particular emphasis on Lake Erie. To meet that objective, Canada and the United States adopted a 40% total phosphorus load reduction target for the western and central basins of the lake. To help assess progress in minimizing Lake Erie\u27s hypoxic zones, the Cooperative Institute for Great Lakes Research (CIGLR) convened a virtual summit in October 2021 to update the state-of-knowledge regarding hypoxia in Lake Erie. This special section summarizes the recommendations for monitoring, assessment, modeling and reporting of hypoxia that resulted from the workshop and features five papers that present new information about hypoxia in Lake Erie. Recognizing that hypoxia occurs in other areas within the Great Lakes basin, a paper investigating seasonal drivers of hypoxia dynamics in Muskegon Lake a drowned river mouth that flows into Lake Michigan, is also featured

The Changing Face of Winter: Lessons and Questions From the Laurentian Great Lakes

Among its many impacts, climate warming is leading to increasing winter air temperatures, decreasing ice cover extent, and changing winter precipitation patterns over the Laurentian Great Lakes and their watershed. Understanding and predicting the consequences of these changes is impeded by a shortage of winter- period studies on most aspects of Great Lake limnology. In this review, we summarize what is known about the Great Lakes during their 3- 6 months of winter and identify key open questions about the physics, chemistry, and biology of the Laurentian Great Lakes and other large, seasonally frozen lakes. Existing studies show that winter conditions have important effects on physical, biogeochemical, and biological processes, not only during winter but in subsequent seasons as well. Ice cover, the extent of which fluctuates dramatically among years and the five lakes, emerges as a key variable that controls many aspects of the functioning of the Great Lakes ecosystem. Studies on the properties and formation of Great Lakes ice, its effect on vertical and horizontal mixing, light conditions, and biota, along with winter measurements of fundamental state and rate parameters in the lakes and their watersheds are needed to close the winter knowledge gap. Overcoming the formidable logistical challenges of winter research on these large and dynamic ecosystems may require investment in new, specialized research infrastructure. Perhaps more importantly, it will demand broader recognition of the value of such work and collaboration between physicists, geochemists, and biologists working on the world’s seasonally freezing lakes and seas.Plain Language SummaryThe Laurentian Great Lakes are the world’s largest freshwater ecosystem and provide diverse ecosystem services to millions of people. Affected by multiple interacting stressors, this system is the target of extensive restoration and management efforts that demand robust scientific knowledge. Winter limnology represents a key knowledge gap that limits understanding and prediction of the function of the Great Lakes and other large temperate lakes. Here, we summarize what is known about the Great Lakes during their 3- 6 months of winter, identify key questions that must be addressed to improve understanding of the physical, chemical, and biological functioning of large lakes in winter, and suggest ways to address these questions. We show that ice cover is a - master variable- that controls numerous aspects of large temperate lake ecology and that the effects of the ongoing reduction in ice cover extent and duration cannot be predicted without improved knowledge of winter limnology.Key PointsWinter limnology is a key knowledge gap that limits understanding and management of the Great Lakes and other large, seasonally frozen lakesWe review the winter physics, chemistry, and biology of the Great Lakes and identify priority questions for winter research on large lakesIce cover is a - master variable- for many large lake limnological processes, making a better understanding of its role a research priorityPeer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168250/1/jgrg21922_am.pdfhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/168250/2/jgrg21922.pd