Middle and posterior cardiac veins: An underused option for ventricular pacing

Tarrasó, Olga;Fuente Fuente, Carlos;Reventós, Manue

1058-71 Visualization of the effect of atrial-ventricular and right-left delay on cardiac output during biventricular pacing

Aprovada pel gerent de l'Institut Municipal d'Hisenda el 15-04-201

Retrograde cardioplegia preserves myocardial function after induced coronary air embolism

AbstractCoronary air embolism is a potential complication of cardiopulmonary bypass. We compared left ventricular function before and after the administration of antegrade or retrograde cardioplegic solution in a porcine model of coronary air embolism. Nineteen pigs were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass support and cooled to 32° C. The heart was initially arrested with antegrade cold blood cardioplegic solution. The aortic crossclamp was released at 30 minutes and 0.02 cc/kg body weight of air was injected into the left anterior descending artery distal to the first diagonal branch. After 5 minutes the aorta was reclamped and the animals treated with 15 ml/kg body weight of 1:4 blood cardioplegic solution delivered by the antegrade (n = 6) or retrograde (n = 7) method. Control animals (n = 6) were not treated. Changes in regional preload recruitable stroke work were used to assess left ventricular performance before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Two control animals could not be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass. Left ventricular function was best preserved after treatment of induced coronary air embolism with retrograde cardioplegia (90% of baseline). Coronary air embolism treatment with antegrade cardioplegia resulted in diminished left ventricular performance (68% of baseline). In control animals left ventricular contractility was significantly impaired (39% of baseline). We conclude that administration of retrograde cardioplegic solution may be an effective method of treating coronary air embolism. The favorable outcome seen with cardioplegia may be in part because of its ability to protect the ischemic myocardium while the solution mechanically dislodges air from the vascular bed. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:917-22

Risk of depression, suicide and psychosis with hydroxychloroquine treatment for rheumatoid arthritis:a multinational network cohort study

Objectives: Concern has been raised in the rheumatology community regarding recent regulatory warnings that HCQ used in the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic could cause acute psychiatric events. We aimed to study whether there is risk of incident depression, suicidal ideation or psychosis associated with HCQ as used for RA.Methods: We performed a new-user cohort study using claims and electronic medical records from 10 sources and 3 countries (Germany, UK and USA). RA patients ≥18 years of age and initiating HCQ were compared with those initiating SSZ (active comparator) and followed up in the short (30 days) and long term (on treatment). Study outcomes included depression, suicide/suicidal ideation and hospitalization for psychosis. Propensity score stratification and calibration using negative control outcomes were used to address confounding. Cox models were fitted to estimate database-specific calibrated hazard ratios (HRs), with estimates pooled where I2 &lt;40%.Results: A total of 918 144 and 290 383 users of HCQ and SSZ, respectively, were included. No consistent risk of psychiatric events was observed with short-term HCQ (compared with SSZ) use, with meta-analytic HRs of 0.96 (95% CI 0.79, 1.16) for depression, 0.94 (95% CI 0.49, 1.77) for suicide/suicidal ideation and 1.03 (95% CI 0.66, 1.60) for psychosis. No consistent long-term risk was seen, with meta-analytic HRs of 0.94 (95% CI 0.71, 1.26) for depression, 0.77 (95% CI 0.56, 1.07) for suicide/suicidal ideation and 0.99 (95% CI 0.72, 1.35) for psychosis.Conclusion: HCQ as used to treat RA does not appear to increase the risk of depression, suicide/suicidal ideation or psychosis compared with SSZ. No effects were seen in the short or long term. Use at a higher dose or for different indications needs further investigation.Trial registration: Registered with EU PAS (reference no. EUPAS34497; http://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm? id=34498). The full study protocol and analysis source code can be found at https://github.com/ohdsi-studies/Covid19EstimationHydroxychloroquine2.</p

Risk of hydroxychloroquine alone and in combination with azithromycin in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a multinational, retrospective study

Background: Hydroxychloroquine, a drug commonly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, has received much negative publicity for adverse events associated with its authorisation for emergency use to treat patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. We studied the safety of hydroxychloroquine, alone and in combination with azithromycin, to determine the risk associated with its use in routine care in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: In this multinational, retrospective study, new user cohort studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis aged 18 years or older and initiating hydroxychloroquine were compared with those initiating sulfasalazine and followed up over 30 days, with 16 severe adverse events studied. Self-controlled case series were done to further establish safety in wider populations, and included all users of hydroxychloroquine regardless of rheumatoid arthritis status or indication. Separately, severe adverse events associated with hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin (compared with hydroxychloroquine plus amoxicillin) were studied. Data comprised 14 sources of claims data or electronic medical records from Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, Spain, the UK, and the USA. Propensity score stratification and calibration using negative control outcomes were used to address confounding. Cox models were fitted to estimate calibrated hazard ratios (HRs) according to drug use. Estimates were pooled where the I2 value was less than 0·4. Findings: The study included 956 374 users of hydroxychloroquine, 310 350 users of sulfasalazine, 323 122 users of hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin, and 351 956 users of hydroxychloroquine plus amoxicillin. No excess risk of severe adverse events was identified when 30-day hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine use were compared. Self-controlled case series confirmed these findings. However, long-term use of hydroxychloroquine appeared to be associated with increased cardiovascular mortality (calibrated HR 1·65 [95% CI 1·12–2·44]). Addition of azithromycin appeared to be associated with an increased risk of 30-day cardiovascular mortality (calibrated HR 2·19 [95% CI 1·22–3·95]), chest pain or angina (1·15 [1·05–1·26]), and hear