The sequential analysis of DNA interpretation and fingerprint ridge patterns on porous paper evidence

In forensic investigations, when porous substances are submitted for analysis, either fingerprint or DNA analysis can be performed. The purpose of this study was to see if it is possible to perform both fingerprint and DNA analysis on the same piece of evidence and to determine the sequence of analysis that produces the best results. Studies have focused on what fingerprint methods affect DNA analysis but have yet to focus on how DNA analysis affects fingerprint enhancement quality. There are many methods to enhance the visibility of fingerprints on porous substances, but this study chose to use ninhydrin and 1,2-indanedione. In this study, three volunteers deposited their DNA and latent prints onto five different paper substrates (money, copy paper, cardboard, cardstock, and thermal paper). The samples then went through one of the following sequences of analysis: 1) fingerprint enhancement first with ninhydrin method, 2) fingerprint enhancement first with 1,2-indanedione method, 3) DNA analysis first and then fingerprint enhancement with ninhydrin method, and 4) DNA analysis first and then fingerprint enhancement with 1,2-indanedione. The results show that the DNA analysis process significantly decreased the fingerprint enhancement quality while the fingerprint enhancement process with either ninhydrin or 1,2-indandione methods does not significantly decrease the quality and quantity of DNA. These results are important because both fingerprint enhancement and DNA analysis can be performed on the same paper substrates

Concurrent light chain amyloidosis and proximal tubulopathy: Insights into different aggregation behavior—A case report

Abstract Due to differences in the protein folding mechanisms, it is exceedingly rare for amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis and monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) to coexist. We herein report the first case of concurrent AL amyloidosis and a subclass of MGRS, light chain proximal tubulopathy (LCPT). The 53‐year‐old female was diagnosed with smoldering myeloma immunoglobulin G kappa and AL amyloidosis with deposits in fat and gastrointestinal tissue. The kidney biopsy did not show amyloid deposits but electron microscopy revealed the presence of LCPT with crystal formation in proximal tubular epithelial cells. This case illustrates the complex pathophysiology of protein deposition in monoclonal gammopathies

Sequence diversity of kappa light chains from patients with AL amyloidosis and multiple myeloma

AL amyloidosis (AL) results from the misfolding of immunoglobulin light chains (IG LCs). Aim of this study was to comprehensively analyse kappa LC sequences from AL patients in comparison with multiple myeloma (MM). We analysed IGKV/IGKJ usage and associated organ tropism and IGKV1/D-33 in terms of mutational analysis and theoretical biochemical properties. cDNA and bulk RNA sequencing of the LCs of AL and MM patients. We studied 41 AL and 83 MM patients showing that IGKV1 was most expressed among kappa AL and MM, with higher frequency in AL (80% vs. 53%, p = .002). IGKV3 was underrepresented in AL (10% vs. 30%, p = .014). IGKJ2 was more commonly used in AL than in MM (39% vs. 29%). Patients with IGKV1/D-33 were associated with heart involvement (75%, p = .024). IGKV1/D-33-segments of AL had a higher mutation count (AL = 12.0 vs. MM = 10.0). FR3 and CDR3 were most frequently mutated in both, with a median mutation count in FR3 being the highest (AL = 4.0; MM = 3.5) and one mutation hotspot (FR3 (83I)) for IGKV1/D-33/IGKJ2 was associated with cardiac involvement. This study confirmed that germline usage has an influence on AL amyloidosis risk and organ involvement.</p