Adults with diabetes residing in "food swamps" have higher hospitalization rates.

ObjectiveTo examine the relationship between food swamps and hospitalization rates among adults with diabetes.Data sourcesBlue Cross Blue Shield Association Community Health Management Hub® 2014, AHRQ Health Care Cost and Utilization Project state inpatient databases 2014, and HHS Area Health Resources File 2010-2014.Study designCross-sectional analysis of 784 counties across 15 states. Food swamps were measured using a ratio of fast food outlets to grocers. Multivariate linear regression estimated the association of food swamp severity and hospitalization rates. Population-weighted models were controlled for comorbidities; Medicaid; emergency room utilization; percentage of population that is female, Black, Hispanic, and over age 65; and state fixed effects. Analyses were stratified by rural-urban category.Principal findingsAdults with diabetes residing in more severe food swamps had higher hospitalization rates. In adjusted analyses, a one unit higher food swamp score was significantly associated with 49.79 (95 percent confidence interval (CI) = 19.28, 80.29) additional all-cause hospitalizations and 19.12 (95 percent CI = 11.09, 27.15) additional ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations per 1000 adults with diabetes. The food swamp/all-cause hospitalization rate relationship was stronger in rural counties than urban counties.ConclusionsFood swamps are significantly associated with higher hospitalization rates among adults with diabetes. Improving the local food environment may help reduce this disparity

Electronic health information exchange in underserved settings: examining initiatives in small physician practices & community health centers.

BackgroundHealth information exchange (HIE) is an important tool for improving efficiency and quality and is required for providers to meet Meaningful Use certification from the United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. However widespread adoption and use of HIE has been difficult to achieve, especially in settings such as smaller-sized physician practices and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). We assess electronic data exchange activities and identify barriers and benefits to HIE participation in two underserved settings.MethodsWe conducted key-informant interviews with stakeholders at physician practices and health centers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and then coded in two waves: first using an open-coding approach and second using selective coding to identify themes that emerged across interviews, including barriers and facilitators to HIE adoption and use.ResultsWe interviewed 24 providers, administrators and office staff from 16 locations in two states. They identified barriers to HIE use at three levels-regional (e.g., lack of area-level exchanges; partner organizations), inter-organizational (e.g., strong relationships with exchange partners; achieving a critical mass of users), and intra-organizational (e.g., type of electronic medical record used; integration into organization's workflow). A major perceived benefit of HIE use was the improved care-coordination clinicians could provide to patients as a direct result of the HIE information. Utilization and perceived benefit of the exchange systems differed based on several practice- and clinic-level factors.ConclusionsThe adoption and use of HIE in underserved settings appears to be impeded by regional, inter-organizational, and intra-organizational factors and facilitated by perceived benefits largely at the intra-organizational level. Stakeholders should consider factors both internal and external to their organization, focusing efforts in changing modifiable factors and tailoring HIE efforts based on all three categories of factors. Collective action between organizations may be needed to address inter-organizational and regional barriers. In the interest of facilitating HIE adoption and use, the impact of interventions at various levels on improving the use of electronic health data exchange should be tested

How do healthcare professionals working in accountable care organisations understand patient activation and engagement? Qualitative interviews across two time points.

ObjectiveIf patient engagement is the new 'blockbuster drug' why are we not seeing spectacular effects? Studies have shown that activated patients have improved health outcomes, and patient engagement has become an integral component of value-based payment and delivery models, including accountable care organisations (ACO). Yet the extent to which clinicians and managers at ACOs understand and reliably execute patient engagement in clinical encounters remains unknown. We assessed the use and understanding of patient engagement approaches among frontline clinicians and managers at ACO-affiliated practices.DesignQualitative study; 103 in-depth, semi-structured interviews.ParticipantsSixty clinicians and eight managers were interviewed at two established ACOs.ApproachWe interviewed healthcare professionals about their awareness, attitudes, understanding and experiences of implementing three key approaches to patient engagement and activation: 1) goal-setting, 2) motivational interviewing and 3) shared decision making. Of the 60 clinicians, 33 were interviewed twice leading to 93 clinician interviews. Of the 8 managers, 2 were interviewed twice leading to 10 manager interviews. We used a thematic analysis approach to the data.Key resultsInterviewees recognised the term 'patient activation and engagement' and had favourable attitudes about the utility of the associated skills. However, in-depth probing revealed that although interviewees reported that they used these patient activation and engagement approaches, they have limited understanding of these approaches.ConclusionsWithout understanding the concept of patient activation and the associated approaches of shared decision making and motivational interviewing, effective implementation in routine care seems like a distant goal. Clinical teams in the ACO model would benefit from specificity defining key terms pertaining to the principles of patient activation and engagement. Measuring the degree of understanding with reward that are better-aligned for behaviour change will minimise the notion that these techniques are already being used and help fulfil the potential of patient-centred care

Decision Aid Implementation and Patients' Preferences for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment: Insights from the High Value Healthcare Collaborative.

Background:Shared decision making (SDM) research has emphasized the role of decision aids (DAs) for helping patients make treatment decisions reflective of their preferences, yet there have been few collaborative multi-institutional efforts to integrate DAs in orthopedic consultations and primary care encounters. Objective:In the context of routine DA implementation for SDM, we investigate which patient-level characteristics are associated with patient preferences for surgery versus medical management before and after exposure to DAs. We explored whether DA implementation in primary care encounters was associated with greater shifts in patients' treatment preferences after exposure to DAs compared to DA implementation in orthopedic consultations. Design:Retrospective cohort study. Setting:10 High Value Healthcare Collaborative (HVHC) health systems. Study participants:A total of 495 hip and 1343 adult knee osteoarthritis patients who were exposed to DAs within HVHC systems between July 2012 to June 2015. Results:Nearly 20% of knee patients and 17% of hip patients remained uncertain about their treatment preferences after viewing DAs. Older patients and patients with high pain levels had an increased preference for surgery. Older patients receiving DAs from three HVHC systems that transitioned DA implementation from orthopedics into primary care had lower odds of preferring surgery after DA exposure compared to older patients in seven HVHC systems that only implemented DAs for orthopedic consultations. Conclusion:Patients' treatment preferences were largely stable over time, highlighting that DAs for SDM largely do not necessarily shift preferences. DAs and SDM processes should be targeted at older adults and patients reporting high pain levels. Initiating treatment conversations in primary versus specialty care settings may also have important implications for engagement of patients in SDM via DAs

Comparing the implementation of team approaches for improving diabetes care in community health centers

Background: Patient panel management and community-based care management may be viable strategies for community health centers to improve the quality of diabetes care for vulnerable patient populations. The objective of our study was to clarify implementation processes and experiences of integrating office-based medical assistant (MA) panel management and community health worker (CHW) community-based management into routine care for diabetic patients. Methods: Mixed methods study with interviews and surveys of clinicians and staff participating in a study comparing the effectiveness of MA and CHW health coaching for improving diabetes care. Participants included 24 key informants in five role categories and 249 clinicians and staff survey respondents from 14 participating practices. We conducted thematic analyses of key informant interview transcripts to clarify implementation processes and describe barriers to integrating the new roles into practice. We surveyed clinicians and staff to assess differences in practice culture among intervention and control groups. We triangulated findings to identify concordant and disparate results across data sources. Results: Implementation processes and experiences varied considerably among the practices implementing CHW and MA team-based approaches, resulting in differences in the organization of health coaching and self-management support activities. Importantly, CHW and MA responsibilities converged over time to focus on health coaching of diabetic patients. MA health coaches experienced difficulty in allocating dedicated time due to other MA responsibilities that often crowded out time for diabetic patient health coaching. Time constraints also limited the personal introduction of patients to health coaches by clinicians. Participants highlighted the importance of a supportive team climate and proactive leadership as important enablers for MAs and CHWs to implement their health coaching responsibilities and also promoted professional growth. Conclusion: Implementation of team-based strategies to improve diabetes care for vulnerable populations was diverse, however all practices converged in their foci on health coaching roles of CHWs and MAs. Our study suggests that a flexible approach to implementing health coaching is more important than fidelity to rigid models that do not allow for variable allocation of responsibilities across team members. Clinicians play an instrumental role in supporting health coaches to grow into their new patient care responsibilities

Evaluating the Impact of an Accountable Care Organization on Population Health: The Quasi-Experimental Design of the German Gesundes Kinzigtal.

A central goal of accountable care organizations (ACOs) is to improve the health of their accountable population. No evidence currently links ACO development to improved population health. A major challenge to establishing the evidence base for the impact of ACOs on population health is the absence of a theoretically grounded, robust, operationally feasible, and meaningful research design. The authors present an evaluation study design, provide an empirical example, and discuss considerations for generating the evidence base for ACO implementation. A quasi-experimental study design using propensity score matching in combination with small-scale exact matching is implemented. Outcome indicators based on claims data were constructed and analyzed. Population health is measured by using a range of mortality indicators: mortality ratio, age at time of death, years of potential life lost/gained, and survival time. The application is assessed using longitudinal data from Gesundes Kinzigtal, one of the leading population-based ACOs in Germany. The proposed matching approach resulted in a balanced control of observable differences between the intervention (ACO) and control groups. The mortality indicators used indicate positive results. For example, 635.6 fewer years of potential life lost (2005.8 vs. 2641.4; t-test: sig. P < 0.05*) in the ACO intervention group (n = 5411) attributable to the ACO, also after controlling for a potential (indirect) immortal time bias by excluding the first half year after enrollment from the outcome measurement. This empirical example of the impact of a German ACO on population health can be extended to the evaluation of ACOs and other integrated delivery models of care

Total arterial off-pump surgery provides excellent outcomes and does not compromise complete revascularization†

OBJECTIVES The combination of aortic ‘no-touch' off-pump surgery (OPCAB) and total arterial revascularization (TAR) can reduce peri-procedural morbidity and yields excellent long-term outcomes albeit at a reported risk of incomplete revascularization. The feasibility of OPCAB-TAR with specific regards to the complete revascularization (CR) in patients with multi-vessel disease was evaluated. METHODS From 2003 to 2010, 712 patients underwent TAR including 526 patients who had OPCAB-TAR and 186 patients who received on-pump TAR [(ONCAB grafting (ONCABG)-TAR)]. Of these, 52% (n=272; OPCAB) vs. 83% (n=155; ONCABG) had triple-vessel disease (TVD). To balance patient characteristics, a non-parsimonious, propensity score (PS) model was applied. Endpoints evaluated were mortality, stroke, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). To evaluate CR, an ‘Index of CR' (ICOR) was calculated, defined as the number of distal anastomoses divided by the number of the diseased coronary vessels. CR was assumed when the following requirements were fulfilled: the number of distal anastomoses was equal to or higher than that of diseased vessels (ICOR≥1), and all affected coronary territories (left anterior descending, circumflex artery and/or right coronary artery) were grafted. RESULTS Mortality was comparable between groups, whereas OPCAB patients suffered from significantly decreased rates of MACCE [3.0 vs. 7.0%; propensity-adjusted odd ratio (PAOR)=0.24; confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.08-0.66; P=0.006] including a clear trend towards reduced stroke and myocardial infarction. In the subgroup with TVD, OPCAB patients presented with significantly reduced rates for MACCE (1.8 vs. 5.8%; PAOR=0.07; CI 95% 0.01-0.65; P=0.02), including a significantly lower rate for stroke. For all-comers, the number of diseased vessels was lower after OPCAB (2.36±0.73 vs. 2.87±0.39; P<0.001) and consequently, these patients received an overall lower number of distal anastomoses (2.42±1.15 vs. 3.06±0.98; P<0.001). Although the ICOR was slightly lower (1.04±0.37 vs. 1.07±0.37; P=0.02), CR was achieved more frequently in OPCAB patients (82.1 vs. 73.1%; P=0.01). In the subgroup with TVD, the number of distal anastomoses (2.99±1.14 vs. 3.10±0.98; P=0.19) and the ICOR (1.00±0.38 vs. 1.03±0.33; P=0.19) was comparable between groups. The frequency of CR was slightly higher (75 vs. 67.7%; P=0.11), and the proportion of complete in situ grafting was significantly higher after OPCAB (37.1 vs. 23.9%; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Aortic ‘no-touch' OPCAB-TAR leads to a significant reduction of MACCE. It does not compromise CR in patients with TVD and thus can be safely applied to these patient

Is off-pump superior to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting in diabetic patients with multivessel disease?

Objective: Diabetic patients often present with diffuse coronary disease than nondiabetic patients posing a greater surgical challenge during off-pump revascularization. In this study, the safety, feasibility, and completeness of revascularization for this subset of patients was assessed. Methods: From 2002 to 2008, 1015 diabetic patients underwent myocardial revascularization. Patients received either off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB; n=540; 53%) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG; n=475; 47%). Data collection was performed prospectively and data analysis was done by propensity-score (PS)-adjusted regression analysis. Primary endpoints were mortality, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), and a composite endpoint including major noncardiac adverse events (MNCAEs) such as respiratory failure, renal failure, and rethoracotomy for bleeding was applied. An index of complete revascularization (ICOR) was defined to assess complete revascularization by dividing the total number of distal anastomoses by the number of diseased vessels. Complete revascularization was assumed when ICOR was >1. Results: OPCAB patients had a significantly lower mortality-rate (1.1% vs 3.8%; propensity-adjusted odds ratio (PAOR)=0.11; p=0.018) and displayed less frequent MACCE (8.3% vs 17.9%; PAOR=0.66; p=0.07) including myocardial infarction (1.3% vs 3.2%; PAOR=0.33; p=0.06) and stroke (0.7% vs 2.3%; PAOR=0.28; p=0.13). Similarly, a significantly lower occurrence of the noncardiac composite endpoint (MNCAE) (PAOR=0.46; confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.35-0.91; p1 was achieved clearly indicating complete revascularization (94.3% vs 93.7%; p=0.24). Conclusions: OPCAB offers a lower mortality and superior postoperative outcomes in diabetic patients with multivessel disease. Arterial grafts are used more frequently that may contribute to better long-term outcomes and the OPCAB approach does not come at the cost of less complete revascularizatio

Total arterial off-pump surgery provides excellent outcomes and does not compromise complete revascularization†

OBJECTIVES The combination of aortic ‘no-touch' off-pump surgery (OPCAB) and total arterial revascularization (TAR) can reduce peri-procedural morbidity and yields excellent long-term outcomes albeit at a reported risk of incomplete revascularization. The feasibility of OPCAB-TAR with specific regards to the complete revascularization (CR) in patients with multi-vessel disease was evaluated. METHODS From 2003 to 2010, 712 patients underwent TAR including 526 patients who had OPCAB-TAR and 186 patients who received on-pump TAR [(ONCAB grafting (ONCABG)-TAR)]. Of these, 52% (n=272; OPCAB) vs. 83% (n=155; ONCABG) had triple-vessel disease (TVD). To balance patient characteristics, a non-parsimonious, propensity score (PS) model was applied. Endpoints evaluated were mortality, stroke, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). To evaluate CR, an ‘Index of CR' (ICOR) was calculated, defined as the number of distal anastomoses divided by the number of the diseased coronary vessels. CR was assumed when the following requirements were fulfilled: the number of distal anastomoses was equal to or higher than that of diseased vessels (ICOR≥1), and all affected coronary territories (left anterior descending, circumflex artery and/or right coronary artery) were grafted. RESULTS Mortality was comparable between groups, whereas OPCAB patients suffered from significantly decreased rates of MACCE [3.0 vs. 7.0%; propensity-adjusted odd ratio (PAOR)=0.24; confidence interval (CI) 95% 0.08-0.66; P=0.006] including a clear trend towards reduced stroke and myocardial infarction. In the subgroup with TVD, OPCAB patients presented with significantly reduced rates for MACCE (1.8 vs. 5.8%; PAOR=0.07; CI 95% 0.01-0.65; P=0.02), including a significantly lower rate for stroke. For all-comers, the number of diseased vessels was lower after OPCAB (2.36±0.73 vs. 2.87±0.39; P<0.001) and consequently, these patients received an overall lower number of distal anastomoses (2.42±1.15 vs. 3.06±0.98; P<0.001). Although the ICOR was slightly lower (1.04±0.37 vs. 1.07±0.37; P=0.02), CR was achieved more frequently in OPCAB patients (82.1 vs. 73.1%; P=0.01). In the subgroup with TVD, the number of distal anastomoses (2.99±1.14 vs. 3.10±0.98; P=0.19) and the ICOR (1.00±0.38 vs. 1.03±0.33; P=0.19) was comparable between groups. The frequency of CR was slightly higher (75 vs. 67.7%; P=0.11), and the proportion of complete in situ grafting was significantly higher after OPCAB (37.1 vs. 23.9%; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS Aortic ‘no-touch' OPCAB-TAR leads to a significant reduction of MACCE. It does not compromise CR in patients with TVD and thus can be safely applied to these patient

Negative microbiological results are not mandatory in deep sternal wound infections before wound closure†

OBJECTIVES To define the outcome of treatment for deep sternal wound infections (DSWIs) using direct wound closure (DC) or vacuum-assisted therapy (VAT) based on negative vs. positive microbiological results. METHODS Between 1999 and 2008, 7746 patients underwent median sternotomy for cardiac surgery at our institution. Patients were screened for DSWI and out of the cohort 159 were identified (2%). These patients were treated, either using DC or VAT with delayed wound closure. Outcomes were retrospectively analysed to determine the effect of negative cultures at the time of closure. RESULTS The indication for sternotomy was CABG 51%, isolated valve 18%, CABG/valve 18% and other related cardiovascular procedures 14%. Sixty-five percent of the wound infections was diagnosed during rehabilitation period. One hundred and five (66%) patients were treated with VAT vs. 54 (34%) patients with direct closure. Coagulase negative staphylococci were found in 48% of bacterial cultures. In 75% of the patients, the microbiological results were positive at time of wound closure (69.2% VAT vs. 87.0% direct closure, P=0.014). Out of 159 patients, 5.0% were with positive microbiological results at the time of closure readmitted vs. 5.1% with negative microbiological results (P=1.0). Patients with VAT stayed significantly longer in the hospital (mean 21±16 vs. 13±12, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS Negative microbiological results are not mandatory before wound closure, as the rate of readmissions for recurrence of infection showed no difference between groups. Our results also suggest that shortening of VAT despite positive microbiological results may be feasibl