Patient-centered professionalism

Introduction: Although the concept of patient-centered professionalism has been defined in the literature and adopted to some extent by key health care regulatory bodies, there has been little research that has identified what the concept means to professionals and patients. Aim: The purpose of this paper is to identify the key concepts of patient-centered professionalism as identified in the literature and to discuss these within the context of existing research across a variety of health care settings. Findings: Key documents have been identified from within nursing, medicine, and pharmacy, which outline what is expected of professionals within these professional groups according to their working practices. Although not defined as patient-centered professionalism, the principles outlined in these documents mirror the definitions of patient-centered professional care defined by Irvine and the Picker Institute and are remarkably similar across the three professions. While patients are identified as being at the heart of health care and professional working practice, research within the fields of community nursing and community pharmacy suggests that patient and professional views diverge as regards what is important, according to different group agendas. In addition, the delivery of patient-centered professional care is often difficult to achieve, due to numerous challenges to the provision of patient-centric care. Conclusion: According to the literature, patient-centered professionalism means putting the patient at the heart of care delivery and working in partnership with the patient to ensure patients are well informed and their care choices are respected. However, limited research has examined what the concept means to patients and health care professionals working with patients and how this fits with literature definitions. Further work is needed to identify aspects of the concept as regards the importance placed on patient-centered professionalism and a mechanism is required for dissemination and integration of the findings to key monitoring and regulatory bodies. Major aspects of the concept, once identified within the various health care arenas, should be incorporated into heath care professional curricula and continued professional development.11 page(s

An independent evaluation of the modernization of NHS endoscopy services in England: data poverty and no improvement

Rationale, aims and objectives The Modernising Endoscopy Services (MES) programme introduced a focussed modernization drive and data collection regime to English NHS endoscopy services. We independently evaluated the MES programme by comparing routinely collected, service-related endoscopy data from sites that participated in the MES programme and sites that did not. Methods A random selection of 10 endoscopy units who had participated in the MES programme (intervention sites) were compared with a random selection of 10 endoscopy units who redesigned their services independently (control sites). Data on demand, numbers waiting, activity and cancellations were collected for eight time points between January 2003 and April 2006. Data were aggregated into intervention and control groups for statistical analysis using a two-way analysis of variance. Activity data were validated using an equivalent Hospital Episode Statistics dataset. Results Data were not routinely collected by 11 of 19 endoscopy units. Trust-held datasets were subsequently included to address problems with data availability. The accuracy of the Activity data was successfully validated. Statistical analysis of the data showed that neither the intervention group nor the control group were able to significantly improve their services over time. There was also no significant difference between the intervention group and the control group in the improvement of their endoscopy services at any point time. Conclusions Based on the data collected, the intervention programme did not significantly improve NHS endoscopy services in England over and above what could have been achieved independently with only the intention to redesign

Wider consultation on Pulmonary Rehabilitation for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

In this article we examine whether an innovative mixed method approach could highlight the positive and challenging effects of a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programme (PRP) on the Quality of Life (QOL) of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). In 2012, we conducted three consultation workshops in Mid-West Wales, UK, with COPD patients that participated in a PRP, their significant others (e.g. spouses and partners), and healthcare professionals who delivered the PRP. We found that there was a resounding enthusiasm for the content and impact of the programme, particularly in the areas of: increased patient activity, enhanced patient control and confidence, a greater willingness to self-manage treatment, and an increased sense of group belonging. Seven key themes mattered most to our study participants: the patient, physical health, mental health, the programme, professionals and significant others, knowledge and education, and the future. We used these themes to craft a best-practice outcomes document (template) of the benefits and challenges of the PRP to inform and support future service evaluation and delivery.URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs150179En este artículo examinamos si un innovador enfoque de método mixto podría poner de relieve los efectos positivos y desafiantes de un Programa de Rehabilitación Pulmonar (PRP) en la calidad de vida (CDV) de los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (EPOC). En 2012, realizamos tres talleres de consulta en el centro-oeste de Gales, Reino Unido, con pacientes con EPOC que participaron en un PRP, con personas importantes para ellos (por ejemplo, cónyuges y parejas), y profesionales de la salud que atienden el PRP. Encontramos que había un entusiasmo muy fuerte por el contenido e impacto del programa, en particular en las áreas de: aumento de la actividad del paciente, mayor control y confianza del paciente, una mayor disposición a autogestionar el tratamiento , y un mayor sentido de pertenencia al grupo. Siete temas importaron más a nuestros participantes del estudio: el paciente, la salud física, la salud mental, el programa, los profesionales y otras personas importantes, conocimientos y educación, y el futuro. Utilizamos estos temas para elaborar una plantilla de las mejores prácticas de los beneficios y desafíos de la PRP, para informar y apoyar la futura evaluación y provisión del servicio.URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs150179In diesem Beitrag beschäftigen wir uns mit einem innovativen Mixed-Methods-Ansatz zur Bewertung der positiven und problematischen Effekte eines Rehabilitationsprogramms, das eine verbesserte Lebensqualität von Patient/innen mit chronisch obstruktiver Lungenerkrankung zum Ziel hatte. Hierzu führten wir 2012 drei Konsultationsworkshops in West-Wales durch mit Patient/innen, die an einem solchen Programm teilgenommen hatten, deren Angehörigen und mit Professionellen, die in dem Programm tätig gewesen waren. Die Resonanz war vergleichsweise enthusiastisch, sowohl was Inhalte und was den Impact des Programms angeht, und zwar vor allem mit Blick auf eine vermehrte Aktivität der Patient/innen, auf deren Kontrollgefühl, Zuversicht und Bereitschaft einer verbesserten Selbstfürsorge sowie ein erhöhtes Zusammengehörigkeitsgefühl. Sieben Schlüsselthemen konnten als besonders relevant für die Untersuchungsteilnehmer/innen herausgearbeitet werden: die Patient/innen, physische Gesundheit, psychische Gesundheit, das Programm, Professionale und Angehörige, Wissen und Bildung sowie die Zukunft. Ausgehend hiervon entwickelten wir einen Best-Practice-Vorschlag für die Konzeption und Durchführung von Folgeprogrammen und -Dienstleistungen.URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs15017

Prognostic prediction tools and clinician communication: a qualitative study of the effect of the STUMBL tool on clinical practice

Background In recent years, researchers and clinicians have been developing prognostic prediction tools (PPTs) as a way of identifying patients at risk of deterioration. The use of PPTs in the clinical environment not only impacts the risk of adverse outcomes for patients, but the use of these tools also effect clinical practice. Much attention has been paid to the clinical performance of PPTs. But more insight is needed on how the use of PPTs impacts clinical practice. The objective of this study was to map some of the ways in which PPTs effect clinical practice. The STUMBL (STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients) feasibility trial evaluated the use of a new prognostic prediction tool (PPT) to guide the management blunt chest wall trauma patients in the emergency departments (ED). The trial was undertaken between October 2016 and September 2018 and conducted at four sites in England and Wales. Nested within the feasibility trial was a qualitative study aimed at understanding how ED clinicians experienced and used the PPT. The qualitative methods included a focus group and telephone interviews with 9 ED clinicians. This study focused on participant perceptions of the feasibility and use of the STUMBL tool on clinical practice in the ED. Results Clinical practice is reshaped as a result of the introduction of the STUMBL PPT into the clinical environment. The PPT enhanced reflexive awareness of prognostic practice; facilitated communication between patients and professionals; helps to guide patient outcomes; and provides a common ground for clinician discussion on prognostication. Conclusions The qualitative data collected offered useful insights into the ways in which the tool changes clinical practice. This was a small study of the effect of one kind of PPT on clinical practice. Nevertheless, this study maps areas in which clinical practice is affected by the introduction of a PPT into the clinical environment. More research is needed to better understand these effects, and to understand how these tools become embedded in clinical practice over the longer term

Comparative study of ChatGPT and human evaluators on the assessment of medical literature according to recognized reportingstandards

Introduction Amid clinicians’ challenges in staying updated with medical research, artificial intelligence (AI) tools like the large language model (LLM) ChatGPT could automate appraisal of research quality, saving time and reducing bias. This study compares the proficiency of ChatGPT3 against human evaluation in scoring abstracts to determine its potential as a tool for evidence synthesis.Methods We compared ChatGPT’s scoring of implant dentistry abstracts with human evaluators using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials for Abstracts reporting standards checklist, yielding an overall compliance score (OCS). Bland-Altman analysis assessed agreement between human and AI-generated OCS percentages. Additional error analysis included mean difference of OCS subscores, Welch’s t-test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient.Results Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of 4.92% (95% CI 0.62%, 0.37%) in OCS between human evaluation and ChatGPT. Error analysis displayed small mean differences in most domains, with the highest in ‘conclusion’ (0.764 (95% CI 0.186, 0.280)) and the lowest in ‘blinding’ (0.034 (95% CI 0.818, 0.895)). The strongest correlations between were in ‘harms’ (r=0.32, p<0.001) and ‘trial registration’ (r=0.34, p=0.002), whereas the weakest were in ‘intervention’ (r=0.02, p<0.001) and ‘objective’ (r=0.06, p<0.001).Conclusion LLMs like ChatGPT can help automate appraisal of medical literature, aiding in the identification of accurately reported research. Possible applications of ChatGPT include integration within medical databases for abstract evaluation. Current limitations include the token limit, restricting its usage to abstracts. As AI technology advances, future versions like GPT4 could offer more reliable, comprehensive evaluations, enhancing the identification of high-quality research and potentially improving patient outcomes

Barriers and facilitators to change in the organisation and delivery of endoscopy services in England and Wales: a focus group study

Objective: Explore professional views of changes to gastroenterology service organisation and delivery and barriers and facilitators impacting on change. The work was undertaken as part of an evaluation in endoscopy service provision catalysed by the Modernising Endoscopy Services Programme of the Modernisation Agency. Design: Focus groups followed by analysis and group-working activities identifying key themes. Setting: English and Welsh secondary care gastroenterology units. Participants: 20 professionals working in gastroenterology in England and Wales. Medical, surgical and nursing specialists including endoscopy nurses. Opportunistic sampling to include senior people in leadership and management roles who were directly involved in service modernisation, excluding those involved in the Modernisation Endoscopy Services Programme. Results: Four 1.5 h focus groups took place in 2007. Summative and thematic analyses captured essential aspects of text and achieved consensus on key themes. 4 themes were revealed: 'loss of personal autonomy and erosion of professionalism', 'lack of senior management understanding', 'barriers and facilitators to change' and 'differences between English and Welsh units'. Themes indicated that low staff morale, lack of funding and senior management support were barriers to effective change. Limitations to the study include the disproportionately low number of focus group attendees from English units and the time delay in reporting these findings. Conclusions: Despite ambitions to implement change, ineffective management support continued to hamper modernisation of service organisation and delivery. While the National Health Service Modernisation Agency Modernising Endoscopy Services Programme acted as a catalyst for change, affecting the way staff work, communicate and think, it was not effective in heralding change itself. However, gastroenterologists were keen to consider the potential for change and future service modernisation. The methodological framework of innovative qualitative enquiry offers comprehensive and rigorous enhancement of quantitative studies, including randomised trials, when a mixed methods approach is needed.7 page(s

Through the looking glass: public and professional perspectives on patient-centred professionalism in modern-day community pharmacy

This paper presents five consultation workshops with 29 community pharmacists, stakeholders and patients that examined "patient-centred professionalism" in terms of pharmacists' working day and environment. The concept is ill-defined in both medical and pharmacy literature and the study aimed to clarify the situated nature of the term for patients and health professionals across settings. Workshops were supported by bio-photographic datasets of "in-situ" practice and Nominal Group Work. The thematic content analyses led to the following aspects: building caring relationships; managing external forces; the effects of space and environment, and different roles and expectations. The study reveals how patient-centred professionalism cannot be defined in any singular or stationary sense, but should be seen as a "moveable feast", best understood through everyday examples of practice and interaction, in relation to whose experience is being expressed, and whose needs considered. The phrase is being mobilised by a whole set of interests and stakeholders to reshape practice, the effect of which remains both uncertain and contested. Whilst patients prioritise a quick and efficient dispensing service from knowledgeable pharmacists, pharmacists rail against increasing public demands and overtly formalised consultations that take them away from the dispensary where the defining aspects of their professionalism lie. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100177Unser Beitrag stellt die Ergebnisse aus insgesamt fünf Workshops mit 29 Apotheker/innen, Patient/innen und weiteren Akteuren vor, die sich mit "Patient/innen-zentrierter Versorgung" in der Alltagsarbeit und -umgebung von Apotheker/innen befassten. Dieses Konzept ist in der relevanten Literatur nur ungenügend definiert, und ein Ziel der Studie war, dessen situativen Charakter für Patient/innen und im Gesundheitssystem Tätige zu präzisieren. In den Workshops kamen Fotografien aus der Alltagspraxis und spezifische Gruppenarbeitsverfahren zum Einsatz. Im Beitrag werden nach einer Information über die Teilnehmenden die Ergebnisse der thematischen Inhaltsanalyse zusammengefasst, die die folgenden Schwerpunkte erbrachte: Aufbau von Beziehungen mit Patient/innen, Umgang mit externen Einflussgrößen, (räumliche) Umgebungseffekte und Unterschiedlichkeit von Rollen und Erwartungen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass "Patient/innen-zentrierte Versorgung" nicht in einer singulären oder statischen Weise definiert werden kann, sondern am besten nachvollziehbar ist entlang von Beispielen aus der Alltagspraxis und von Alltagsinteraktionen, abhängig davon, wessen Erfahrungen ausgedrückt und wessen Bedürfnisse im Fokus stehen sollen. Dieses Verständnis trifft für eine Vielzahl an Interessen und Akteuren zu, um Praxis zu rekonzeptualisieren, die zugleich auch fragil und strittig ist: Während Patient/innen möglichst schnelle und effektive Dienstleistungen von sachkundigen Apotheker/innen erwarten, wenden diese sich gegen wachsende öffentliche Ansprüche und zunehmend formalisierte Beratungen, die sie von der Art von Arbeit entfernen, die Kern ihrer professionellen Identität ist. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100177Este documento presenta cinco talleres de consulta con 29 farmacéuticos comunitarios, los promotores y los pacientes que examinaron "el profesionalismo centrado en el paciente" en términos de jornada de trabajo de los farmacéuticos y el medio ambiente. El concepto está mal definido, tanto en la literatura médica y farmacéutica, y el estudio tuvo como objetivo aclarar la naturaleza situada del término en los pacientes y en los profesionales de la salud en diferentes contextos. Los talleres fueron apoyados por conjuntos de datos bio-fotográficas de la práctica "in-situ" y el Grupo Nominal de Trabajo. El análisis de contenido temático c a los siguientes aspectos: creación de relaciones afectuosas; gestión de fuerzas externas; los efectos del espacio y el medio ambiente, y roles y expectativas diferentes. El estudio revela cómo el profesionalismo centrado en el paciente no puede definirse en un sentido singular o estacional, pero debe ser visto como “fiesta ambulante”, mejor entendida a través de ejemplos de la vida diaria y la interacción, en relación con cuya experiencia se expresa, y cuyas necesidades considera. La frase está siendo movilizada por un juego entero de intereses y de los promotores para reformar la práctica, el efecto del cual sigue siendo incierto y puesto en debate. Mientras los pacientes priorizan un servicio de distribución rápido y eficiente de parte de farmacéuticos bien informados, los farmacéuticos critican severamente las crecientes demandas públicas y abiertamente formalizan consultas que se los llevan lejos del dispensario donde radican los aspectos de definición de su profesionalismo. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs10017

Development of a parent version of the Manchester-Minneapolis quality of life survey for use by parents and carers of UK children: MMQL-UK (PF)

Background: Although it is now widely endorsed that children should as far as possible rate their own health related quality of life (HRQL), there are situations where proxy information on child HRQL may be useful, especially where a child is too ill or young to provide their own HRQL assessment. There is limited availability of generic HRQL scales that have a parallel child and parent version and that are reliable, valid, brief, comprehensible and suitable for use in UK populations. The aims of this study were therefore to develop and validate a parent version of the anglicised Manchester-Minneapolis Quality of Life child form (MMQL-UK (CF)) and to determine the level of association between the child and parent versions of this form. Methods: This study was undertaken concurrently with the anglicisation and validation of the MMQL, a measure of HRQL developed for use with children in North America. At that time, no parent version existed, so the MMQL form for children (MMQL-UK (CF)) was used as the basis for the development of the MMQL-UK parent form (PF). The sample included a control group of healthy children and their parents and five exemplar groups; children diagnosed with asthma, diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease and their parents, children in remission from cancer and their parents and children in public care and their carers. Consistency of the MMQL-UK (PF) components were assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha. Validation of the parent questionnaire was undertaken by comparing MMQL-UK (PF) component scores with comparable components on the proxy PedsQL™ quality of life scales, comparing MMQL-UK (PF) component scores between parents of healthy and chronic disease children and by comparison of component scores from children and their parents or carers. Reproducibility and responsiveness were assessed by retesting parents by follow-up questionnaires. Results: A total of 874 children (completing MMQL-UK (CF)) and 572 parents or carers (completing MMQL-UK (PF)) took part in the study. The internal consistency of all the MMQL-UK (PF) components exceeding the accepted criterion of 0.70 and the construct validity was good with moderate correlations being evident between comparable components of the MMQL-UK (PF) and the proxy PedsQL™. Discriminant validity was demonstrated with significant differences being identified between parents of healthy children and those with chronic conditions. Intra-class correlations exceeded 0.65 for all MMQL-UK (PF) components demonstrating good reproducibility. Weak to moderate levels of responsiveness were demonstrated for all but social functioning. The MMQL-UK (PF) showed moderate parent-child correlation with the MMQL-UK (CF) for all components. The best correlations were seen for those components measuring the same construct (Pearson's r ranged from 0.31 to 0.61, p < 0.01 for equivalent components). Conclusion: The MMQL-UK (PF) showed moderate to good correlations with the MMQL-UK (CF) component scores. The MMQL-UK (PF) will be of use when comparing child and parent/carer perception of the impact of a child's condition on their HRQL or where the child is too ill or young to provide their own report