Assessing the effects of mitofusin 2 deficiency in the adult heart using 3D electron tomography

The effects of mitofusin 2 (MFN2) deficiency, on mitochondrial morphology and the mitochondria-junctional sarcoplasmic reticulum (jSR) complex in the adult heart, have been previously investigated using 2D electron microscopy, an approach which is unable to provide a 3D spatial assessment of these imaging parameters. Here, we use 3D electron tomography to show that MFN2-deficient mitochondria are larger in volume, more elongated, and less rounded; have fewer mitochondria-jSR contacts, and an increase in the distance between mitochondria and jSR, when compared to WT mitochondria. In comparison to 2D electron microscopy, 3D electron tomography can provide further insights into mitochondrial morphology and the mitochondria-jSR complex in the adult heart

Preconditioning and postconditioning: from bench to bedside

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death world-wide. Since 1990, more people in the world have diedfrom CHD than from any other disease (World Health Organisation, WHO). “Conditioning” the heart to render it more resistant to the detrimental effects of acute ischaemia-reperfusion injury harnesses the endogenous ability of the heart to protect itself. This can be achieved using various mechanical strategies including the application of brief episodes of ischaemia and reperfusion to either the heart itself (ischaemic preconditioning) or an organ/tissue remote from the heart (remote ischaemic preconditioning) prior to the sustained ischaemic insult. Importantly, this form of protection can be mimicked by pharmacological agents capable of recapitulating the protective effect of IPC(pharmacological preconditioning). Preconditioning-induced cardioprotection is clearly restricted to patients undergoing an anticipated ischaemic insult such as in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In contrast, the other major form of “conditioning” termed postconditioning can be implemented in patients presenting with an acute myocardial infarction after the onset of the sustained ischaemic insult. In this setting, myocardial reperfusion is interrupted with intermittent short-lived episodes of myocardial ischaemia applied to the heart itself (ischaemic postconditioning) or an organ or tissue remote from the heart (remote ischaemic postconditioning) – an effect which can again be mimicked by pharmacological agents (pharmacological postconditioning).This article will briefly review these various forms of“conditioning” examining the underlying mechanistic pathways and their clinical application

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin prior to cardiac surgery predicts acute kidney injury and mortality.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate whether preoperative serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (sNGALpre-op) predicted postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) during hospitalisation and 1-year cardiovascular and all-cause mortality following adult cardiac surgery. METHODS: This study was a post hoc analysis of the Effect of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Clinical Outcomes in Patient Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery trial involving adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft. Postoperative AKI within 72 hours was defined using the International Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes classification. RESULTS: 1371 out of 1612 patients had data on sNGALpre-op. The overall 1-year cardiovascular and all-cause mortality was 5.2% (71/1371) and 7.7% (105/1371), respectively. There was an observed increase in the incidence of AKI from the first to the third tertile of sNGALpre-op (30.5%, 41.5% and 45.9%, respectively, p220 ng/L) had an estimated twofold increase risk of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality at 1 year. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT101247545; Post-results

The Diabetic Heart: Too Sweet for Its Own Good?

Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for ischemic heart disease (IHD). Patients with diabetes and IHD experience worse clinical outcomes, suggesting that the diabetic heart may be more susceptible to ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). In contrast, the animal data suggests that the diabetic heart may be either more, equally, or even less susceptible to IRI. The conflicting animal data may be due to the choice of diabetic and/or IRI animal model. Ischemic conditioning, a phenomenon in which the heart is protected against IRI by one or more brief nonlethal periods of ischemia and reperfusion, may provide a novel cardioprotective strategy for the diabetic heart. Whether the diabetic heart is amenable to ischemic conditioning remains to be determined using relevant animal models of IRI and/or diabetes. In this paper, we review the limitations of the current experimental models used to investigate IRI and cardioprotection in the diabetic heart

Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Whether remote ischemic preconditioning (transient ischemia and reperfusion of the arm) can improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary-artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery is not known. We investigated this question in a randomized trial. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, sham-controlled trial involving adults at increased surgical risk who were undergoing on-pump CABG (with or without valve surgery) with blood cardioplegia. After anesthesia induction and before surgical incision, patients were randomly assigned to remote ischemic preconditioning (four 5-minute inflations and deflations of a standard blood-pressure cuff on the upper arm) or sham conditioning (control group). Anesthetic management and perioperative care were not standardized. The combined primary end point was death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, or stroke, assessed 12 months after randomization. RESULTS: We enrolled a total of 1612 patients (811 in the control group and 801 in the ischemic-preconditioning group) at 30 cardiac surgery centers in the United Kingdom. There was no significant difference in the cumulative incidence of the primary end point at 12 months between the patients in the remote ischemic preconditioning group and those in the control group (212 patients [26.5%] and 225 patients [27.7%], respectively; hazard ratio with ischemic preconditioning, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.15; P=0.58). Furthermore, there were no significant between-group differences in either adverse events or the secondary end points of perioperative myocardial injury (assessed on the basis of the area under the curve for the high-sensitivity assay of serum troponin T at 72 hours), inotrope score (calculated from the maximum dose of the individual inotropic agents administered in the first 3 days after surgery), acute kidney injury, duration of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, distance on the 6-minute walk test, and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Remote ischemic preconditioning did not improve clinical outcomes in patients undergoing elective on-pump CABG with or without valve surgery. (Funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Program [a Medical Research Council and National Institute of Health Research partnership] and the British Heart Foundation; ERICCA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01247545.)

Effect of Remote Ischaemic preconditioning on Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing Coronary Artery bypass graft surgery (ERICCA study): a multicentre double-blind randomised controlled clinical trial

BackgroundNovel cardioprotective strategies are required to improve clinical outcomes in higher-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) with or without valve surgery. Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) in which brief episodes of non-lethal ischaemia and reperfusion are applied to the arm or leg has been demonstrated to reduce perioperative myocardial injury (PMI) following CABG with or without valve surgery.ObjectiveTo investigate whether or not RIPC can improve clinical outcomes in this setting in the Effect of Remote Ischaemic preconditioning on Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing Coronary Artery bypass graft surgery (ERICCA) study in patients undergoing CABG surgery.DesignMulticentre, double-blind, randomised sham controlled trial.SettingThe study was conducted across 30 cardiothoracic centres in the UK between March 2010 and March 2015.ParticipantsEligible patients were higher-risk adult patients (aged &gt; 18 years of age; additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk of ≥ 5) undergoing on-pump CABG with or without valve surgery with blood cardioplegia.InterventionsPatients were randomised to receive either RIPC (four 5-minute inflations/deflations of a standard blood pressure cuff placed on the upper arm) or the sham control procedure (simulated RIPC protocol) following anaesthetic induction and prior to surgical incision. Anaesthetic management and perioperative care were not standardised.Main outcome measuresThe combined primary end point was the rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebral events comprising cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularisation and stroke within 12 months of randomisation. Secondary end points included perioperative myocardial and acute kidney injury (AKI), intensive care unit and hospital stay, inotrope score, left ventricular ejection fraction, changes in quality of life and exercise tolerance.ResultsIn total, 1612 patients (sham control group,n = 811; RIPC group,n = 801) were randomised in 30 cardiac surgery centres in the UK. There was no difference in the primary end point at 12 months between the RIPC group and the sham control group (26.5% vs. 27.7%; hazard ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 1.15;p = 0.58). Furthermore, there was no evidence for any differences in either adverse events or the secondary end points of PMI (72-hour area under the curve for serum high-sensitivity troponin T), inotrope score, AKI, intensive therapy unit and hospital stay, 6-minute walk test and quality of life.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing elective on-pump CABG with or without valve surgery, without standardisation of the anaesthetic regimen, RIPC using transient arm ischaemia–reperfusion did not improve clinical outcomes. It is important that studies continue to investigate the potential mechanisms underlying RIPC, as this may facilitate the translation of this simple, non-invasive, low-cost intervention into patient benefit. The limitations of the study include the lack of standardised pre-/perioperative anaesthesia and medication, the level of missing and incomplete data for some of the secondary end points and the incompleteness of the data for the echocardiography substudy.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01247545.FundingThis project was funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme, a MRC and NIHR partnership, and the British Heart Foundation.</jats:sec