Statistical models for animal movement and landscape connectivity

2013 Summer.Includes bibliographical references.This dissertation considers statistical approaches to the study of animal movement behavior and landscape connectivity, with particular attention paid to modeling how movement and connectivity are influenced by landscape characteristics. For animal movement data, a novel continuous-time, discrete-space model of animal movement is proposed. This model yields increased computational efficiency relative to existing discrete-space models for animal movement, and a more flexible modeling framework than existing continuous-space models. In landscape genetic approaches to landscape connectivity, spatially-referenced genetic allele data are used to study landscape effects on gene flow. An explicit link is described between a common circuit-theoretic approach to landscape genetics and variogram fitting for Gaussian Markov random fields. A hierarchical model for landscape genetic data is also proposed, with a multinomial data model and latent spatial random effects to model spatial correlation

Social fluidity mobilizes contagion in human and animal populations

International audienceHumans and other group-living animals tend to distribute their social effort disproportionately. Individuals predominantly interact with a small number of close companions while maintaining weaker social bonds with less familiar group members. By incorporating this behavior into a mathematical model, we find that a single parameter, which we refer to as social fluidity, controls the rate of social mixing within the group. Large values of social fluidity correspond to gregarious behavior, whereas small values signify the existence of persistent bonds between individuals. We compare the social fluidity of 13 species by applying the model to empirical human and animal social interaction data. To investigate how social behavior influences the likelihood of an epidemic outbreak, we derive an analytical expression of the relationship between social fluidity and the basic reproductive number of an infectious disease. For species that form more stable social bonds, the model describes frequency-dependent transmission that is sensitive to changes in social fluidity. As social fluidity increases, animal-disease systems become increasingly density-dependent. Finally, we demonstrate that social fluidity is a stronger predictor of disease outcomes than both group size and connectivity, and it provides an integrated framework for both density-dependent and frequency-dependent transmission

Confronting models with data: the challenges of estimating disease spillover

For pathogens known to transmit across host species, strategic investment in disease control requires knowledge about where and when spillover transmission is likely. One approach to estimating spillover is to directly correlate observed spillover events with covariates. An alternative is to mechanistically combine information on host density, distribution and pathogen prevalence to predict where and when spillover events are expected to occur. We use several case studies at the wildlife–livestock disease interface to highlight the challenges, and potential solutions, to estimating spatiotemporal variation in spillover risk. Datasets on multiple host species often do not align in space, time or resolution, and may have no estimates of observation error. Linking these datasets requires they be related to a common spatial and temporal resolution and appropriately propagating errors in predictions can be difficult. Hierarchical models are one potential solution, but for fine-resolution predictions at broad spatial scales, many models become computationally challenging. Despite these limitations, the confrontation of mechanistic predictions with observed events is an important avenue for developing a better understanding of pathogen spillover. Systems where data have been collected at all levels in the spillover process are rare, or non-existent, and require investment and sustained effort across disciplines. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Dynamic and integrative approaches to understanding pathogen spillover’