7 research outputs found

    Integrating Cancer Patients’ Satisfaction with Rescue Medication in Pain Assessments

    Get PDF
    A patient’s pain intensity rating alone is insufficient grounds for determining the pain medication and dosage to administer daily. This study aimed to investigate whether a convenient assessment method could be developed that would reflect the effectiveness of an opioid analgesic on cancer patients’ pain management. We investigated pain intensity (worst, least, average, current) and the effectiveness of the opioid rescue medication in terms of patient satisfaction. This study used Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients to evaluate the relationships between patient satisfaction with rescue medication and both pain intensity and the medication’s perceived effectiveness. Data from 60 participants with a mean age of 60.5±11.4 years (range: 31-79 years) were analyzed. Thirty-eight (63.3%) participants were male, and 22 (36.7%) were female. The correlations found between rescue medication satisfaction and both the worst numerical rating scale (NRS) rating (r=−0.15, P=0.16) and the average NRS rating (r=−0.13, P=0.13) were not statistically significant. A significant positive correlation was observed between rescue medication satisfaction and the medication’s perceived effectiveness (r=0.79, P<0.0001). Patient satisfaction with their rescue medication can be routinely assessed without imposing a significant burden on the patient. A new assessment method incorporating rescue medication satisfaction and pain intensity measures could allow routine pain assessments to reflect both pain intensity and the effectiveness of opioid analgesics. This new assessment method is potentially preferable to self-reported pain intensity and can identify patients for whom treatment is a priority. It also facilitates rapid dose adjustments and reduces the side effects of overdose due to unnecessary increases in opioid analgesics

    Small cholangiolocellular carcinoma that was difficult to distinguish from cholangiocellular carcinoma: a case report

    No full text
    Abstract Background Cholangiolocellular carcinoma (CoCC) is thought to be derived from hepatic progenitor cells. Because of its origin, CoCC has diverse clinicopathological and imaging findings. Here, we report a case of small CoCC that was difficult to diagnose preoperatively. Case presentation A 62-year-old woman was confirmed with a small liver nodule in the left lobe 2 years after a sustained virological response of hepatitis C virus. The size of the nodule was 11.9 × 6.1 mm, and 6 months later, the size increased to 12.5 × 7.8 mm. The doubling time of this tumor was 285 days. The tumor revealed peripheral early enhancement and delayed internal staining in dynamic computed tomography images and marked high intensity in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans. These imaging findings resembled those of cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC). The tumor was removed by laparoscopic lateral sectionectomy. Pathological findings revealed that the tumor was composed of small cuboidal cells and showed irregular anastomosis small grand. Immunohistochemical findings showed that the tumor cells were negative for Hep-par 1 and positive for cytokeratin 19. Epithelial membrane antigen staining was positive for the membranous side of the lumen. According to these pathological findings, the tumor was diagnosed as CoCC. Conclusion Although some characteristic imaging findings are reported for CoCC, they are not specific because of the variety in pathological findings. Especially, small CoCCs might have poor characteristic imaging findings and may be difficult to distinguish from CCC in the images. However, slow tumor growth might be one of the characteristics to suspect the possibility of a CoCC
    corecore