11 research outputs found

    Allosteric interactions at adenosine A1 and A3 receptors: new insights into the role of small molecules and receptor dimerization

    Get PDF
    Keywords:adenosine;allosterism;receptor;GPCR;dimerization;biased signalling The purine nucleoside adenosine is present in all cells in tightly regulated concentrations. It is released under a variety of physiological and pathophysiological conditions to facilitate protection and regeneration of tissues. Adenosine acts via specific GPCRs to either stimulate cyclic AMP formation, as exemplified by Gs-protein-coupled adenosine receptors (A2A and A2B), or inhibit AC activity, in the case of Gi/o-coupled adenosine receptors (A1 and A3). Recent advances in our understanding of GPCR structure have provided insights into the conformational changes that occur during receptor activation following binding of agonists to orthosteric (i.e. at the same binding site as an endogenous modulator) and allosteric regulators to allosteric sites (i.e. at a site that is topographically distinct from the endogenous modulator). Binding of drugs to allosteric sites may lead to changes in affinity or efficacy, and affords considerable potential for increased selectivity in new drug development. Herein, we provide an overview of the properties of selective allosteric regulators of the adenosine A1 and A3 receptors, focusing on the impact of receptor dimerization, mechanistic approaches to single-cell ligand-binding kinetics and the effects of A1- and A3-receptor allosteric modulators on in vivo pharmacology

    Topical delivery of muscarinic receptor antagonists prevents and reverses peripheral neuropathy in female diabetic mice

    No full text
    Muscarinic antagonists promote sensory neurite outgrowth in vitro and prevent and/or reverse multiple indices of peripheral neuropathy in rodent models of diabetes, chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, and HIV protein-induced neuropathy when delivered systemically. We measured plasma concentrations of the M1 receptor-selective muscarinic antagonist pirenzepine when delivered by subcutaneous injection, oral gavage, or topical application to the skin and investigated efficacy of topically delivered pirenzepine against indices of peripheral neuropathy in diabetic mice. Topical application of 2% pirenzepine to the paw resulted in plasma concentrations 6 hours postdelivery that approximated those previously shown to promote neurite outgrowth in vitro. Topical delivery of pirenzepine to the paw of mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes dose-dependently (0.1%-10.0%) prevented tactile allodynia, thermal hypoalgesia, and loss of epidermal nerve fibers in the treated paw and attenuated large fiber motor nerve conduction slowing in the ipsilateral limb. Efficacy against some indices of neuropathy was also noted in the contralateral limb, indicating systemic effects following local treatment. Topical pirenzepine also reversed established paw heat hypoalgesia, whereas withdrawal of treatment resulted in a gradual decline in efficacy over 2-4 weeks. Efficacy of topical pirenzepine was muted when treatment was reduced from 5 to 3 or 1 day/wk. Similar local effects were noted with the nonselective muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine when applied either to the paw or to the eye. Topical delivery of muscarinic antagonists may serve as a practical therapeutic approach to treating diabetic and other peripheral neuropathies. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Muscarinic antagonist pirenzepine alleviates diabetic peripheral neuropathy when applied topically in mice

    Using Corneal Confocal Microscopy to Identify Therapeutic Agents for Diabetic Neuropathy

    Get PDF
    Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is emerging as a tool for identifying small fiber neuropathy in both peripheral neuropathies and neurodegenerative disease of the central nervous system (CNS). The value of corneal nerves as biomarkers for efficacy of clinical interventions against small fiber neuropathy and neurodegenerative disease is less clear but may be supported by preclinical studies of investigational agents. We, therefore, used diverse investigational agents to assess concordance of efficacy against corneal nerve loss and peripheral neuropathy in a mouse model of diabetes. Ocular delivery of the peptides ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) or the glucagon-like peptide (GLP) analog exendin-4, both of which prevent diabetic neuropathy when given systemically, restored corneal nerve density within 2 weeks. Similarly, ocular delivery of the muscarinic receptor antagonist cyclopentolate protected corneal nerve density while concurrently reversing indices of systemic peripheral neuropathy. Conversely, systemic delivery of the muscarinic antagonist glycopyrrolate, but not gallamine, prevented multiple indices of systemic peripheral neuropathy and concurrently protected against corneal nerve loss. These data highlight the potential for use of corneal nerve quantification by confocal microscopy as a bridging assay between in vitro and whole animal assays in drug development programs for neuroprotectants and support its use as a biomarker of efficacy against peripheral neuropathy
    corecore