14 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Meta-analysis of preclinical studies of mesenchymal stromal cells to treat rheumatoid arthritis.
BackgroundThis study aims to evaluate the quality of preclinical data, determine the effect sizes, and identify experimental measures that inform efficacy using mesenchymal stromal (or stem) cells (MSC) therapy in animal models of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsLiterature searches were performed on MSC preclinical studies to treat RA. MSC treatment effect sizes were determined by the most commonly used outcome measures, including paw thickness, clinical score, and histological score.FindingsA total of 48 studies and 94 treatment arms were included, among which 42 studies and 79 treatment arms reported that MSC improved outcomes. The effect sizes of RA treatments using MSC, when compared to the controls, were: paw thickness was ameliorated by 53.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 26.7% -80.4%), histological score was decreased by 44.9% (95% CI: 33.3% -56.6%), and clinical score was decreased by 29.9% (95% CI: 16.7% -43.0%). Specifically, our results indicated that human umbilical cord derived MSC led to large improvements of the clinical score (-42.1%) and histological score (-51.4%).InterpretationTo the best of our knowledge, this meta-analysis is to quantitatively answer whether MSC represent a robust RA treatment in animal models. It suggests that in preclinical studies, MSC have consistently exhibited therapeutic benefits. The findings demonstrate a need for considering variations in different animal models and treatment protocols in future studies using MSC to treat RA in humans to maximise the therapeutic gains in the era of precision medicine.FundsNIH [1DP2CA195763], Baylx Inc.: BI-206512, NINDS/NIH Training Grant [Award# NS082174]
The Fungus Aspergillus aculeatus Enhances Salt-Stress Tolerance, Metabolite Accumulation, and Improves Forage Quality in Perennial Ryegrass
Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) is an important forage grass with high yield and superior quality in temperate regions which is widely used in parks, sport field, and other places. However, perennial ryegrass is moderately tolerant to salinity stress compared to other commercial cultivars and salt stress reduces their growth and productivity. Aspergillus aculeatus has been documented to participate in alleviating damage induced by salinity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the mechanisms underlying A. aculeatus-mediated salt tolerance, and forage quality of perennial ryegrass exposed to 0, 200, and 400 mM NaCl concentrations. Physiological markers and forage quality of perennial ryegrass to salt stress were evaluated based on the growth rate, photosynthesis, antioxidant enzymes activity, lipid peroxidation, ionic homeostasis, the nutritional value of forage, and metabolites. Plants inoculated with A. aculeatus exhibited higher relative growth rate (RGR), turf and forage quality under salt stress than un-inoculated plants. Moreover, in inoculated plants, the fungus remarkably improved plant photosynthetic efficiency, reduced the antioxidant enzymes activity (POD and CAT), and attenuated lipid peroxidation (decreased H2O2 and MDA accumulation) induced by salinity, compared to un-inoculated plants. Furthermore, the fungus also acts as an important role in maintaining the lower Na/K ratio and metabolites and lower the amino acids (Alanine, Proline, GABA, and Asparagine), and soluble sugars (Glucose and Fructose) for inoculated plants than un-inoculated ones. Our results suggest that A. aculeatus may be involved in modulating perennial ryegrass tolerance to salinity in various ways
Recommended from our members
Meta-analysis of preclinical studies of mesenchymal stromal cells to treat rheumatoid arthritis.
BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the quality of preclinical data, determine the effect sizes, and identify experimental measures that inform efficacy using mesenchymal stromal (or stem) cells (MSC) therapy in animal models of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Literature searches were performed on MSC preclinical studies to treat RA. MSC treatment effect sizes were determined by the most commonly used outcome measures, including paw thickness, clinical score, and histological score. FINDINGS: A total of 48 studies and 94 treatment arms were included, among which 42 studies and 79 treatment arms reported that MSC improved outcomes. The effect sizes of RA treatments using MSC, when compared to the controls, were: paw thickness was ameliorated by 53.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 26.7% -80.4%), histological score was decreased by 44.9% (95% CI: 33.3% -56.6%), and clinical score was decreased by 29.9% (95% CI: 16.7% -43.0%). Specifically, our results indicated that human umbilical cord derived MSC led to large improvements of the clinical score (-42.1%) and histological score (-51.4%). INTERPRETATION: To the best of our knowledge, this meta-analysis is to quantitatively answer whether MSC represent a robust RA treatment in animal models. It suggests that in preclinical studies, MSC have consistently exhibited therapeutic benefits. The findings demonstrate a need for considering variations in different animal models and treatment protocols in future studies using MSC to treat RA in humans to maximise the therapeutic gains in the era of precision medicine. FUNDS: NIH [1DP2CA195763], Baylx Inc.: BI-206512, NINDS/NIH Training Grant [Award# NS082174]
Recommended from our members
Meta-analysis of preclinical studies of mesenchymal stromal cells to treat rheumatoid arthritis.
BackgroundThis study aims to evaluate the quality of preclinical data, determine the effect sizes, and identify experimental measures that inform efficacy using mesenchymal stromal (or stem) cells (MSC) therapy in animal models of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).MethodsLiterature searches were performed on MSC preclinical studies to treat RA. MSC treatment effect sizes were determined by the most commonly used outcome measures, including paw thickness, clinical score, and histological score.FindingsA total of 48 studies and 94 treatment arms were included, among which 42 studies and 79 treatment arms reported that MSC improved outcomes. The effect sizes of RA treatments using MSC, when compared to the controls, were: paw thickness was ameliorated by 53.6% (95% confidence interval (CI): 26.7% -80.4%), histological score was decreased by 44.9% (95% CI: 33.3% -56.6%), and clinical score was decreased by 29.9% (95% CI: 16.7% -43.0%). Specifically, our results indicated that human umbilical cord derived MSC led to large improvements of the clinical score (-42.1%) and histological score (-51.4%).InterpretationTo the best of our knowledge, this meta-analysis is to quantitatively answer whether MSC represent a robust RA treatment in animal models. It suggests that in preclinical studies, MSC have consistently exhibited therapeutic benefits. The findings demonstrate a need for considering variations in different animal models and treatment protocols in future studies using MSC to treat RA in humans to maximise the therapeutic gains in the era of precision medicine.FundsNIH [1DP2CA195763], Baylx Inc.: BI-206512, NINDS/NIH Training Grant [Award# NS082174]
Recommended from our members
Preclinical Evaluation of a Single Intravenous Infusion of hUC-MSC (BX-U001) in Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory disease of the joints, which causes severe pain and excessive systemic circulation of harmful inflammatory cytokines. Current treatments are limited, with some patients not responding well, and some experiencing severe and detrimental side effects. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are cell-based therapeutics being evaluated as potent immunomodulators in RA and may provide relief to patients not responding well to drug-based treatments. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of BX-U001 human umbilical cord tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSC) to treat RA, in support of a successful investigational new drug application. A collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mouse model of RA was established in DBA/1 J mice. Mice from the treatment assessment group were given a tail vein infusion of hUC-MSC 24 days after primary RA induction, while control assessment (CA) group mice were given cell-free carrier solution. All animals were evaluated daily for RA symptoms via clinical scoring, blood was taken periodically for cytokine analysis, and mice were dissected at end point for histological analysis. A linear mixed model was used to compare the rate of change among groups. The clinical scores of TA group were significantly reduced compared with CA group (P < 0.01), indicating therapeutic effects. The histological scores of the joints in TA group were significantly lower than those in the CA group (P < 0.05), but had no significant difference compared with Healthy groups (P > 0.05). The concentration of (interleukin) IL-6 in TA group was significantly reduced by 80.0% (P < 0.0001) 2 days after treatment and by 93.4% at the experimental endpoint compared with levels prior to hUC-MSC injection. A single intravenous infusion of hUC-MSC (2 × 106 cells/mouse), to CIA-induced DBA/1 J mice, resulted in significant alleviation of RA symptoms and may provide significant therapeutic benefits in humans
Recommended from our members
Preclinical Evaluation of a Single Intravenous Infusion of hUC-MSC (BX-U001) in Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an inflammatory disease of the joints, which causes severe pain and excessive systemic circulation of harmful inflammatory cytokines. Current treatments are limited, with some patients not responding well, and some experiencing severe and detrimental side effects. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) are cell-based therapeutics being evaluated as potent immunomodulators in RA and may provide relief to patients not responding well to drug-based treatments. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of BX-U001 human umbilical cord tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSC) to treat RA, in support of a successful investigational new drug application. A collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mouse model of RA was established in DBA/1 J mice. Mice from the treatment assessment group were given a tail vein infusion of hUC-MSC 24 days after primary RA induction, while control assessment (CA) group mice were given cell-free carrier solution. All animals were evaluated daily for RA symptoms via clinical scoring, blood was taken periodically for cytokine analysis, and mice were dissected at end point for histological analysis. A linear mixed model was used to compare the rate of change among groups. The clinical scores of TA group were significantly reduced compared with CA group (P < 0.01), indicating therapeutic effects. The histological scores of the joints in TA group were significantly lower than those in the CA group (P < 0.05), but had no significant difference compared with Healthy groups (P > 0.05). The concentration of (interleukin) IL-6 in TA group was significantly reduced by 80.0% (P < 0.0001) 2 days after treatment and by 93.4% at the experimental endpoint compared with levels prior to hUC-MSC injection. A single intravenous infusion of hUC-MSC (2 × 106 cells/mouse), to CIA-induced DBA/1 J mice, resulted in significant alleviation of RA symptoms and may provide significant therapeutic benefits in humans
Effectiveness and safety of valsartan in children aged 6 to 16 years with hypertension
The effectiveness and safety of valsartan have not been assessed in hypertensive children. Therefore, hypertensive patients aged 6 to 16 years (n=261) were randomized to receive weight‐stratified low‐ (10/20 mg), medium‐ (40/80 mg), or high‐dose (80/160 mg) valsartan for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, patients were randomized to a 2‐week placebo‐controlled withdrawal phase. Dose‐dependent reductions in sitting systolic blood pressure (SSBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (SDBP) were observed after 2 weeks (low dose, −7.9/−4.6 mm Hg; medium dose, −9.6/−5.8 mm Hg; high dose, −11.5/−7.4 mm Hg [P<.0001 for all groups]). During the withdrawal phase, SSBP and SDBP were both lower in the pooled valsartan group than in the pooled placebo group (SSBP, −2.7 mm Hg [P=.0368]; SDBP, −3.0 mm Hg [P=.0047]). Similar efficacy was observed in all subgroups. Valsartan was well tolerated and headache was the most commonly observed adverse event during both the double‐blind and 52‐week open‐label phases. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011;13:357–365. ©2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Safety and efficacy of Pazopanib in advanced soft tissue sarcoma: PALETTE (EORTC 62072) subgroup analyses
BACKGROUND: PALETTE is a phase 3 trial that demonstrated single-agent activity of pazopanib in advanced soft tissue sarcomas (aSTS). We performed retrospective subgroup analyses to explore potential relationships between patient characteristics, prior lines of therapy, dose intensity, and dose modifications on safety and efficacy of pazopanib in aSTS. METHODS: PALETTE compared pazopanib with placebo in patients with aSTS (age ≥ 18 years) whose disease had progressed during or following prior chemotherapy. In these subgroup analyses, median progression-free survival (mPFS) among patients receiving pazopanib was the efficacy outcome of interest. Adverse events (AEs) were also compared within subgroups. All analyses were descriptive and exploratory. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients received pazopanib in the PALETTE study. The mPFS was longer in patients who had only 1 prior line versus 2+ prior lines of therapy (24.7 vs 18.9 weeks, respectively); AE rates were similar regardless of number of prior lines of therapy. The mPFS was similar in patients aged < 65 and ≥ 65 y (20.0 and 20.1 weeks, respectively). Although AEs leading to study discontinuation were higher in older patients (≥65 y, 30%; < 65 y, 17%), rates of dose reductions, dose interruptions, and serious AEs were similar between the 2 age groups. No reduction in mPFS was noted in patients requiring dose reductions or dose interruptions to manage toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Longer mPFS was observed in patients receiving pazopanib following only 1 line of therapy. Additionally, mPFS with pazopanib was maintained regardless of patient age or dose modifications used to manage toxicity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00753688 , first posted September 16, 2008 (registered prospectively).status: publishe