An estimate of the economic impact of immunotherapy relative to PD-L1 expression in Brazil - An update with brazilian costs

Delivering high quality cancer care at an affordable cost is one of the main challenges for health care professionals and policy makers, especially in lowand middle-income countries. The objective of our study is to assess the economic impact of nivolumab and pembrolizumab with and without the use of PD-L1 as a biomarker in Brazil.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Custo-efetividade da adição de quimioterapia ao tratamento hormonal do câncer de próstata metastático sensível a hormônio ou localizado de alto risco

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of chemohormonal therapy in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive and non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer. Methods: An analytical decision model was developed to determine the cost-effectiveness of chemohormonal therapy versus androgen deprivation therapy alone in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer and patients with non-metastatic high-risk prostate cancer. The cost-effectiveness in metastatic patients with a high-volume disease was assessed separately. The model used data from randomized clinical trials and drug acquisition costs in Brazil. In addition, the costs of post-progression therapies have been included in this model. The benefits to health are expressed as the quality-adjusted life-years, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated. Results: Chemohormonal therapy may be associated with improved quality-adjusted life-years for all patient. The improvement was more than six times greater for patients with high-volume metastatic disease. In these patients, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were up to 74% lower than the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of patients with non-metastatic disease. Conclusion: Chemohormonal therapy has been more cost-effective in patients with high-volume metastatic disease.Objetivo: Avaliar a relação custo-efetividade da adição de quimioterapia hormonal em pacientes com câncer de próstata metastático sensível a hormônio ou localizado de alto risco. Métodos: Um modelo de decisão analítico foi desenvolvido para determinar o custo-efetividade da adição de quimioterapia versus a monoterapia de privação de andrógeno para pacientes com câncer de próstata metastático hormônio-sensível e pacientes de alto risco com câncer de próstata não metastático. O custo-efetividade em pacientes metastáticos com um alto volume da doença foi verificado isoladamente. Os dados do modelo foram obtidos de ensaios clínicos randomizados utilizando custos de aquisição de medicamentos no Brasil. Os custos de terapias pós-progressão também foram incluídos no modelo. Os efeitos foram expressos em anos de vida ajustados por qualidade, e foram calculadas as razões de custo-efetividade incremental. Resultados: A adição de quimioterapia levou a um ganho de anos de vida ajustados por qualidade para todos os doentes. Este incremento foi seis vezes maior para os pacientes com doença metastática de alto volume. Nestes pacientes, as taxas do custo incremental por anos de vida ajustados por qualidade foram até 74% mais baixos do que o aumento das taxas dos pacientes com doença não metastática. Conclusão: A adição de quimioterapia foi mais custo-efetiva para pacientes com doença metastática de alto volume.Fac Med ABC, Santo Andre, SP, BrazilBeneficencia Portuguesa Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Paulista, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilMiami Univ, Sylvester Comprehens Canc Ctr, Oxford, OH 45056 USAUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of Scienc

Economic impact of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in Brazil and strategies to improve access

6612 Background: Immunotherapy was elected by ASCO as the most important advance in Oncology for the last 2 consecutive years. Nevertheless, the costs of immune checkpoint inhibitors is a limitation to their incorporation in several countries, including Brazil. The objective of this study is to estimate the economic impact of immunotherapy and make suggestions in order to improve the access for patients who benefit the most from treatment. Methods: We assessed Brazilian cancer epidemiology data and the international literature to estimate the number of eligible patients each year. The authors estimated the economic impact according to the medication acquisition costs converted to US dollars. The median duration of the treatment was based upon the clinical trials. Results: We assessed 3 different agents (and one combo) for 7 indications. The results are summarized in the table below. Conclusions: The current cost of immune checkpoint inhibitors is prohibitive in the public health system in Brazil. While the country’s GDP per capita is 78% lower than that of the US, immune checkpoint inhibitors have similar prices in both. Biomarker selection, posology, and lower cost drugs help decrease the total economic impact of therapy. Price discrimination and volume discounts would help improve access. Further studies and discussion with all stakeholders is needed to identify patients who would benefit the most and to implement strategies to increase access to these potentially life-saving therapies. [Table: see text

EGFR and EML4-ALK updated therapies in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Non-small cell lung cancer is the leading cancer-related cause of death.OBJECTIVE: We review the latest therapies for NSCLC with EGFR and ELM4-ALK mutations as well as the most relevant studies and promising patents.METHOD: A literature search of PubMed database was carried out to identify recent Clinical Trials using EGFR therapies and novel patents involving diagnosis and therapies on NSCLC. We conducted a search to find new therapy strategies, new biomarkers, and selected five patents we find relevant.RESULTS: Over the last few years, identification of cancer harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (EGFR) or chromosomal rearrangements of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) led to new ways in classifying and treating NSCLC. On the other hand, acquired resistance are a constantly challenge in the management of patients with these mutations and new drugs options are in development to improve and amplify treatment strategies.CONCLUSIONS: Currently, EGFR TKIs (e.g.: erlotinib, gefitinib, osimertinib) and ALK inhibitors (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib) provided a new face for advanced NSCLC outcomes. To understand the disease molecular profile is mandatory to define the best approach for each patient

An Update of a Pooled Analysis of Nivolumab for the Treatment of Advanced NSCLC and the Role of PD-L1 as a BIOMARKER

Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Clin Oncol, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Algarve, Faro, PortugalUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, BrazilUniv Porto, Porto, PortugalOncoclin Brasil, Sao Paulo, BrazilClinical Oncology, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo/BRAZILUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo/BRAZILWeb of Scienc