Structure of a ubiquitin-loaded HECT ligase reveals the molecular basis for catalytic priming

n/

Structural insights into the catalysis and regulation of E3 ubiquitin ligases

Covalent attachment (conjugation) of one or more ubiquitin molecules to protein substrates governs numerous eukaryotic cellular processes, including apoptosis, cell division and immune responses. Ubiquitylation was originally associated with protein degradation, but it is now clear that ubiquitylation also mediates processes such as protein–protein interactions and cell signalling depending on the type of ubiquitin conjugation. Ubiquitin ligases (E3s) catalyse the final step of ubiquitin conjugation by transferring ubiquitin from ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) to substrates. In humans, more than 600 E3s contribute to determining the fates of thousands of substrates; hence, E3s need to be tightly regulated to ensure accurate substrate ubiquitylation. Recent findings illustrate how E3s function on a structural level and how they coordinate with E2s and substrates to meticulously conjugate ubiquitin. Insights regarding the mechanisms of E3 regulation, including structural aspects of their autoinhibition and activation are also emerging

Determination of the pK(a) of the N-terminal amino group of ubiquitin by NMR

This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (grants U117533887 and grant U117565398 until March 2015) and by the Francis Crick Institute which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (FC001142, FC10029), the UK Medical Research Council (FC001142, FC10029), and the Wellcome Trust (FC001142, FC10029)

USP15 regulates SMURF2 kinetics through C-lobe mediated deubiquitination

Ubiquitin modification of the TGF-ß pathway components is emerging as a key mechanism of TGF-ß pathway regulation. To limit TGF-ß responses, TGF-ß signaling is regulated through a negative feedback loop whereby the E3 ligase SMURF2 targets the TGF-ß receptor (TßR) complex for ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Counteracting this process, a number of deubiquitinating (DUBs) enzymes have recently been identified that deubiquitinate and stabilize the TßR. However the precise mechanism by which these DUBs act on TßR function remains poorly defined. Here, we demonstrate that apart from targeting the TßR complex directly, USP15 also deubiquitinates SMURF2 resulting in enhanced TßR stability and downstream pathway activation. Through proteomic analysis, we show that USP15 modulates the ubiquitination of Lys734, a residue required for SMURF2 catalytic activity. Our results show that SMURF2 is a critical target of USP15 in the TGF-ß pathway and may also explain how USP15 and SMURF2 target multiple complementary protein complexes in other pathways

Site-specific ubiquitination affects protein energetics and proteasomal degradation

Changes in the cellular environment modulate protein energy landscapes to drive important biology, with consequences for signaling, allostery, and other vital processes. The effects of ubiquitination are particularly important because of their potential influence on degradation by the 26S proteasome. Moreover, proteasomal engagement requires unstructured initiation regions that many known proteasome substrates lack. To assess the energetic effects of ubiquitination and how these manifest at the proteasome, we developed a generalizable strategy to produce isopeptide-linked ubiquitin within structured regions of a protein. The effects on the energy landscape vary from negligible to dramatic, depending on the protein and site of ubiquitination. Ubiquitination at sensitive sites destabilizes the native structure and increases the rate of proteasomal degradation. Importantly, in well-folded proteins, ubiquitination can even induce the requisite unstructured regions needed for proteasomal engagement. Our results indicate a biophysical role of site-specific ubiquitination as a potential regulatory mechanism for energy-dependent substrate degradation