28 research outputs found

    Sleep-disordered breathing-do we have to change gears in heart failure?

    No full text
    The majority of patients with heart failure have sleep-disordered breathing (SDB)-with central (rather than obstructive) sleep apnoea becoming the predominant form in those with more severe disease. Cyclical apnoeas and hypopnoeas are associated with sleep disturbance, hypoxaemia, haemodynamic changes, and sympathetic activation. Such patients have a worse prognosis than those without SDB. Mask-based therapies of positive airway pressure targeted at SDB can improve measures of sleep quality and partially normalise the sleep and respiratory physiology, but recent randomised trials of cardiovascular outcomes in central sleep apnoea have been neutral or suggested the possibility of harm, likely from increased sudden death. Further randomised outcome studies (with cardiovascular mortality and hospitalisation endpoints) are required to determine whether mask-based treatment for SDB is appropriate for patients with chronic systolic heart failure and obstructive sleep apnoea, for those with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, and for those with decompensated heart failure. New therapies for sleep apnoea-such as implantable phrenic nerve stimulators-also require robust assessment. No longer can the surrogate endpoints of improvement in respiratory and sleep metrics be taken as adequate therapeutic outcome measures in patients with heart failure and sleep apnoea

    ICAR: endoscopic skull‐base surgery

    Get PDF
    n/

    How Cell Concentrations Are Implicated in Cell Selectivity of Antimicrobial Peptides

    No full text
    Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are known to selectively bind to and kill microbes over host cells. Contrary to a conventional view, there is now evidence that AMP’s cell selectivity varies with cell densities and is not uniquely determined. Using a coarse-grained model, we study how the cell selectivity of membrane-lytic AMPs, defined as the ratio between their minimum hemolytic (MHC) and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC), depends on cell densities or on the way it is measured. A general picture emerging from our study is that the selectivity better captures peptide’s intrinsic properties at low cell densities. The selectivity, however, decreases and becomes less intrinsic as the cell density increases, as long as it is chosen to be the same for both types of cells. Importantly, our results show that the selectivity can be excessively overestimated if higher host cell concentrations are used; in contrast, it becomes mistakenly small if measured for a mixture of both types of cells, even with similar choices of cell densities (i.e., higher host cell densities). Our approach can be used as a fitting model for relating the intrinsic selectivity to the apparent (cell-density-dependent) one
    corecore