Hormonal contraceptives : effectiveness and adverse effects

Since the introduction of the first contraceptive pill in 1959, the development of new hormonal contraceptives has focused on maintaining the benefits of oral contraceptives while reducing their adverse effects. Four approaches have been used to optimize the risk-benefit profile: (i) lowering of the steroid dose; (ii) development of new formulas and schedules of administration; (iii) development of new steroids and (iv) development of new routes of administration. The first objective of this thesis was to compare the multiphasic schedule of administration of oral contraceptives with the classic monophasic schedule of administration in terms of contraceptive effectiveness, bleeding pattern and discontinuation. The second objective was to predict the thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives containing the new steroid drospirenone by comparing the thrombin generation-based APC-resistance in users of pills containing drospirenone with the APC-resistance in users of pills containing other progestogens. We also focused on the biological basis of acquired APC-resistance in oral contraceptive users by studying the two main determinants of the thrombin generation-based APC-resistance test, free protein S and tissue factor pathway inhibitor free antigen. In addition, we tested the usefulness of sex hormone binding globulin as a new marker for the thrombotic risk of a hormonal contraceptive. The third objective was to estimate the thrombotic risk of contraceptives which administer steroids vaginally, transdermally or intrauterine by assessing the effect of these contraceptives on thrombin generation-based APC-resistance. At last we evaluated whether varying levels of estradiol and progesterone during a natural menstrual cycle are associated with differences in APC-resistance.UBL - phd migration 201

Hormonal contraceptives : effectiveness and adverse effects

Since the introduction of the first contraceptive pill in 1959, the development of new hormonal contraceptives has focused on maintaining the benefits of oral contraceptives while reducing their adverse effects. Four approaches have been used to optimize the risk-benefit profile: (i) lowering of the steroid dose; (ii) development of new formulas and schedules of administration; (iii) development of new steroids and (iv) development of new routes of administration. The first objective of this thesis was to compare the multiphasic schedule of administration of oral contraceptives with the classic monophasic schedule of administration in terms of contraceptive effectiveness, bleeding pattern and discontinuation. The second objective was to predict the thrombotic risk of oral contraceptives containing the new steroid drospirenone by comparing the thrombin generation-based APC-resistance in users of pills containing drospirenone with the APC-resistance in users of pills containing other progestogens. We also focused on the biological basis of acquired APC-resistance in oral contraceptive users by studying the two main determinants of the thrombin generation-based APC-resistance test, free protein S and tissue factor pathway inhibitor free antigen. In addition, we tested the usefulness of sex hormone binding globulin as a new marker for the thrombotic risk of a hormonal contraceptive. The third objective was to estimate the thrombotic risk of contraceptives which administer steroids vaginally, transdermally or intrauterine by assessing the effect of these contraceptives on thrombin generation-based APC-resistance. At last we evaluated whether varying levels of estradiol and progesterone during a natural menstrual cycle are associated with differences in APC-resistance

Triphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception

Cervix cance

Quadriphasic versus monophasic oral contraceptives for contraception

Cervix cance

Increased incidence of ovarian cancer in both endometriosis and adenomyosis

Item does not contain fulltex

Vaginal hysterectomy versus vaginal assisted NOTES hysterectomy (VANH): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Introduction Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery is a minimal invasive technique using natural body orifices like the vagina. Benefits of a vaginal assisted NOTES hysterectomy (VANH) are no visible scars, less blood loss, shorter surgery time and it allows more women to undergo a hysterectomy in a day-care setting compared with the total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Trials comparing vaginal hysterectomy (VH) and VANH are lacking. The aim of this study is to compare hysterectomy by VANH versus VH for same-day discharge (SDD), complications, surgical outcomes, postoperative recovery, quality of life, costs and cost-effectiveness.Methods and analysis The study is a single-blinded, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Eligible women with benign indication for hysterectomy will be randomly allocated to the VH (control) group or the VANH (intervention) group. The primary outcome is SDD. We calculated a sample size of 124 women assuming 27% SDD difference with an alpha of 0.05 and power of 0.8. A total of 83 patients will be included in the VANH-group and 41 patients in the VH-group, using an enrolment ratio of 2:1. Secondary outcomes are; surgery-related complications, surgical outcomes, postoperative recovery, quality of life, costs and cost-effectiveness.Ethics and dissemination The study was approved on 27 May 2021 by the Ethics Committee of the Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen. The first patient was randomised on 8 July 2021. The last participant randomised should be treated before 31 December 2022. The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at scientific meetings within 4 years after starting recruitment