Disordered Structural Ensembles of Vasopressin and Oxytocin and Their Mutants

Vasopressin and oxytocin are intrinsically disordered cyclic nonapeptides belonging to a family of neurohypophysial hormones. Although unique in their functions, these peptides differ only by two residues and both feature a tocin ring formed by the disulfide bridge between first and sixth cysteine residues. This sequence and structural similarity are experimentally linked to oxytocin agonism at vasopressin receptors and vasopressin antagonism at oxytocin receptors. Yet single- or double-residue mutations in both peptides have been shown to have drastic impacts on their activities at either receptor, and possibly the ability to bind to their neurophysin carrier protein. In this study we perform molecular dynamics simulations of the unbound native and mutant sequences of the oxytocin and vasopressin hormones to characterize their structural ensembles. We classify the subpopulations of these structural ensembles on the basis of the distributions of radius of gyration and secondary structure and hydrogen-bonding features of the canonical tocin ring and disordered tail region. We then relate the structural changes observed in the unbound form of the different hormone sequences to experimental information about peptide receptor binding, and more indirectly, carrier protein binding affinity, receptor activity, and protease degradation. This study supports the hypothesis that the structural characteristics of the unbound form of an IDP can be used to predict structural or functional preferences of its functional bound form

Prediction of protein assemblies, the next frontier: The CASP14-CAPRI experiment

We present the results for CAPRI Round 50, the fourth joint CASP-CAPRI protein assembly prediction challenge. The Round comprised a total of twelve targets, including six dimers, three trimers, and three higher-order oligomers. Four of these were easy targets, for which good structural templates were available either for the full assembly, or for the main interfaces (of the higher-order oligomers). Eight were difficult targets for which only distantly related templates were found for the individual subunits. Twenty-five CAPRI groups including eight automatic servers submitted ~1250 models per target. Twenty groups including six servers participated in the CAPRI scoring challenge submitted ~190 models per target. The accuracy of the predicted models was evaluated using the classical CAPRI criteria. The prediction performance was measured by a weighted scoring scheme that takes into account the number of models of acceptable quality or higher submitted by each group as part of their five top-ranking models. Compared to the previous CASP-CAPRI challenge, top performing groups submitted such models for a larger fraction (70–75%) of the targets in this Round, but fewer of these models were of high accuracy. Scorer groups achieved stronger performance with more groups submitting correct models for 70–80% of the targets or achieving high accuracy predictions. Servers performed less well in general, except for the MDOCKPP and LZERD servers, who performed on par with human groups. In addition to these results, major advances in methodology are discussed, providing an informative overview of where the prediction of protein assemblies currently stands