14 research outputs found

    Diversity and relationships of eggplants from three geographically distant secondary centers of diversity

    Get PDF
    Eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) was domesticated in the Indo-Birmanian region, which is also the primary center of diversity for this crop. From there eggplant spread to other regions, and diversity accumulated in several secondary centers of diversity. We have assessed the diversity and relationships of 52 accessions of eggplant from three geographically distant secondary centers of diversity (China, Spain, and Sri Lanka) using 28 morphological descriptors and 12 highly polymorphic genomic SSRs. A wide variation was found for most morphological traits, and significant differences among the three centers of diversity were detected for 22 of these traits. The PCA analysis showed that eggplants from the three origins were morphologically differentiated, and accessions from each of the three secondary centers of diversity presented a typical combination of morphological characteristics. In this respect, discriminant analysis showed that accessions could be correctly classified to their origin using only six traits. The SSR characterization identified 110 alleles and allowed obtaining a unique genetic fingerprint for each accession. Many alleles were found to be private to each origin, but no universal alleles were found for any of the origins. The PCA analysis showed that the genetic differentiation among origins was less clear than for morphological traits, although the analysis of the population structure shows that accessions mostly group according to the origin, but also provides evidence of migration among the three secondary centers of diversity. The genetic diversity (HT) within each origin was high, ranging between H-T = 0.5400 (Sri Lanka) and H-T = 0.4943 (China), while the standardized genetic differentiation (G'(ST)) among origins was moderate (G'(ST) = 0.2657). The correlation between morphological and SSR distances was non-significant (r = 0.044), indicating that both data are complementary for the conservation of germplasm and breeding of eggplant. These results are relevant for the management of genetic resources, breeding programmes, and evolutionary studies of eggplant.This work was financed by the Ministerio de Ciencia e innovacion (grants AGL2009-07257 and RF-2008-00008-00-00) (http://www.micinn.es). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Hurtado Ricart, M.; Vilanova Navarro, S.; Plazas Ávila, MDLO.; Gramazio, P.; Fonseka, HH.; Fonseka, R.; Prohens Tomås, J. (2012). Diversity and relationships of eggplants from three geographically distant secondary centers of diversity. PLoS ONE. 7:41748-41748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041748S4174841748

    Solanum insanum L. (subgenus Leptostemonum Bitter, Solanaceae), the neglected wild progenitor of eggplant ( S. melongena L.): a review of taxonomy, characteristics and uses aimed at its enhancement for improved eggplant breeding

    Get PDF
    [EN] Solanum insanum L. (Solanaceaeae) is the wild progenitor of common eggplant (S. melongena L.) and is naturally distributed in south and southeast Asia, Madagascar and Mauritius. Despite interest in its potential for eggplant breeding it has not been studied extensively. Solanum insanum has been subjected to various taxonomic treatments, with several discussions and arguments on its delimitation as a species, due to its close similarities with the cultivated S. melongena and the wild species S. incanum L. from the Middle East and northern Africa. Solanum insanum has long been used in a variety of medicinal and culinary preparations across many different Asian ethnolinguistic groups. Limited studies carried out on its chemical composition and pharmacognostical properties coupled with ethnobotanic studies reveal that S. insanum has potential for eggplant improvement with respect to phytochemical properties of interest for human health. Further study of morphological and genetic diversity in S. insanum is essential to promote its utilization in eggplant breeding, in light of its potential to hybridize with cultivated eggplant successfully. Here we compile and review the taxonomy, phytogeography, ecology and habitat characteristics, cytology, ethnobotany, breeding and phytochemical analysis of S. insanum. A comprehensive botanical description and illustrations for S. insanum are provided. A detailed comparison of S. insanum and its closely allied species, S. melongena and S. incanum is also made. The potential of S. insanum for crop improvement and future research priorities are discussed.This work was undertaken as part of the initiative "Adapting Agriculture to Climate Change: Collecting, Protecting and Preparing Crop Wild Relatives" (http://www.cwrdiversity.org/) that is supported by the Government of Norway, managed by the Global Crop Diversity Trust with the Millennium Seed Bank of the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, and implemented in partnership with national and international gene banks and plant breeding institutes around the world; work constructing the database underpinning Solanaceae Source was funded by the National Science Foundation (DEB-0316614 "PBI Solanum: a worldwide treatment" to SK); herbarium visits for SK and XA were funded from the SYNTHESYS Project (http://www.synthesys.info/) which is financed by European Community Research Infrastructure Action under the FP6 and FP7 "Structuring the European Research Area" Programmes.Ranil, R.; Prohens Tomás, J.; Aubriot, X.; Niran, H.; Plazas Ávila, MDLO.; Fonseka, R.; Vilanova Navarro, S.... (2017). Solanum insanum L. (subgenus Leptostemonum Bitter, Solanaceae), the neglected wild progenitor of eggplant ( S. melongena L.): a review of taxonomy, characteristics and uses aimed at its enhancement for improved eggplant breeding. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 64(7):1707-1722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-016-0467-z17071722647Aubriot X, Singh P, Knapp S (2016) Tropical Asian species show the Old World clade of “spiny solanums” (the Leptostemonum Clade: Solanaceae) is not monophyletic. Bot J Linn Soc 180:1–27. doi: 10.1111/boj.12412Bean AR (2012 onwards) Solanum species of eastern and northern Australia. Version: 29th June 2013. http://www.delta-intkey.com/solanum/www/incanum.htm . Accessed 14 July 2016Bhaduri PN (1951) Inter-relationship of non-tuberiferous species of Solanum with some consideration of the origin of brinjal (S. melongena L.). Indian J Genet Plant Breed 11:75–81Bhakyaraj R (2010) In-vitro culture, hairy root induction, solasodine production and pharmacological studies on Solanum melongena var. insanum. PhD. Dissertation, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappall, IndiaBitter G (1923) Solana Africana. IV. Repertorium Speciarum Novarum Regni Vegetabilum Beihefte 16:1–320Blanca J, Cañizares J, Cordero L, Pascual L, Diez MJ, Nuez F (2012) Variation revealed by SNP genotyping and morphology provides insight into the origin of the tomato. PLoS ONE 7(10):e48198Bock DG, Kane NC, Ebert DP, Rieseberg LH (2013) Genome skimming reveals the origin of the Jerusalem Artichoke tuber crop species: neither from Jerusalem nor an artichoke. New Phytol 201:1021–1030Bohs L (2005) Major clades in Solanum based on ndhF sequences. In: Keating RC, Hollowell VC, Croat TB (eds) A festschrift for William G. D’ Arcy: the legacy of a taxonomist, Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, vol 104. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, pp 27–49Brown WH (1920) Minor products of Philippine forests. Bureau of Forestry, ManilaCaruso G, Gomez LD, Ferriello F, Andolfi A, Borgonuovo C, Evidente A, Simister R, McQueen-Mason SJ, Carputo D, Frusciante L, Ercolano MR (2016) Exploring tomato Solanum pennellii introgression lines for residual biomass and enzyme digestibility traits. BMC Genom 17:56. doi: 10.1186/s12863-016-0362-9Causse M, Desplat N, Pascual L, Le Paslier M-C, Sauvage C, Bauchet G, Bérard A, Bounon R, Tchoumakov M, Brunel D, Bouchet J-P (2013) Whole genome resequencing in tomato reveals variation associated with introgression and breeding events. BMC Genom 14:791Cericola F, Portis E, Toppino L, Barchi L, Acciarri N, Ciriaci T, Sala T, Rotino GL, Lanteri S (2013) The population structure and diversity of eggplant from Asia and the Mediterrranean Basin. PLoS ONE 8(9):e.0073702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.73702Daunay MC, Hazra P (2012) Eggplant. In: Hazra P, Peter KV (eds) Handbook of vegetables. Studium Press, Houston, pp 257–322Davidar P, Snow AA, Rajkumar M, Pasquet R, Daunay M-C, Mutegi E (2015) The potential for crop to wild hybridization in eggplant (Solanum melongena; Solanaceae) in southern India. Am J Bot 102:128–138Deb DB (1979) Solanaceae in India. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Skelding AD (eds) The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press and Linnean Society of London, London, pp 87–112Deb D (1989) Solanum melongena, Solanum incanum versus Solanum insanum (Solanaceae). Taxon 38:138–139Dempewolf H, Eastwood RJ, Guarino L, Khoury CK, Muller JV, Toll J (2014) Adapting agriculture to climate change: a global initiative to collect, conserve, and use crop wild relatives. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 38:369–377Duthie JF (1911) Flora of the upper Gangetic Plains and of the adjacent Siwalik and sub-Himalayan tracts, vol 2. Government Press, CalcuttaElias J, Rajesh MG, Anish NP, Ragitha EV, Jayan N (2010) Pharmacognostic standaridation of Solanum melongena var. insanum Linn. Res J Pharmacogn Phytochem 2:364–376Endersby JJ (2008) Joseph Hooker; a philosophical botanist. J Biosci 33:163–169Eshed Y, Zamir D (1994) A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in L. esculentum: a tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica 79:175–179Fontaine MC, Pease JB, Steele A, Waterhouse RM, Neafsey DE, Sarakhov IV, Jiang X, Hall AB, Catterucia F, Kakani E, Mitchell SN, Wu Y-C, Smith HA, Love ER, Lawniczak MK, Slotman MA, Emrich SJ, Hahn MW, Besansky NJ (2015) Extensive introgression in a malaria vector complex revealed by phylogenomics. Science 347(6217):1258524-1–1258524-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1258524Gamble JS (1921) Flora of the presidency of Madras. Part 4. Secretary of State for India, LondonGisbert C, Prohens J, Raigon MD, Stommel JR, Nuez F (2011) Eggplant relatives as sources of variation for developing new rootstocks: effect of grafting on eggplant yield and fruit apparent quality and composition. Sci Hortic 128:14–22Hammer K, Teklu Y (2008) Plant genetic resources: selected issues from genetic erosion to genetic engineering. J Agric Rural Dev Trop Subtrop 109:15–50Hepper FN (1987) Solanaceae. In: Dassanayake MD (ed) A revised handbook of the flora of Ceylon, vol 6. Amerind Publishing Company Private Limited, New Delhi, pp 365–409Hepper FN, Jaeger PML (1985) The typification of six Linnaean names in solanum. Kew Bull 40:387–391Hopkins J, Maxted N (2010) Crop wild relatives: plant conservation for food security. Natl Engl, PeterboroughHul S, Dy Phon P (2014) Solanaceae. In: Aubréville A, Leroy JF, Morat P (eds.). Flore du Cambodge, du Laos et du Vietnam. Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France & Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom, pp 1–93Jaeger P-ML (1985) Systematic studies in the genus Solanum in Africa. Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United KingdomJaeger P-ML, Hepper FN (1986) A review of the genus Solanum in Africa. In: D’Arcy WG (ed) Solanaceae: biology and systematics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 41–55Jayaweera DMA (1982) Medicinal plants (indigenous and exotic) used in Ceylon, vol 5. National Science Council of Sri Lanka, ColomboKarihaloo JL, Rai M (1995) Significance of morphological variability in Solanum insanum L. (sensu lato). Plant Genet Resour Newsl 103:24–26Karihaloo JL, Brauner S, Gottlieb LD (1995) Random amplified polymorphic DNA variation in the eggplant, Solanum melongena L. (Solanaceae). Theor Appl Genet 90:767–770Kashyap V, Kumar VV, Collonnier C, Fusari F, Haicour R, Rotino GL, Sihachakr D, Rajan MV (2003) Biotechnology of eggplant. Sci Hortic 97:1–25Kaushik P, Prohens J, Vilanova S, Gramazio P, Plazas M (2016) Phenotyping of eggplant wild relatives and interspecific hybrids with conventional and phenomics descriptors provides insight for their potential utilization in breeding. Front Plant Sci 7:677Kirti PB, Rao BGS (1982) Cytological studies on F1 hybrids of Solanum integrifolium with S. melongena and S. melongena var. insanum. Genetica 59:127–131Knapp S (2013) A revision of the Dulcamaroid Clade of Solanum L. (Solanaceae). PhytoKeys 22:1–432Knapp S, Vorontsova MS, Prohens J (2013) Wild relatives of the eggplant (Solanum melongena L.: Solanaceae): new understanding of species names in a complex group. PLoS ONE 8:e57039Komlaga G, Sam GH, Dickson RA, Mensah MLK, Fleischer TC (2014) Pharmacognostic studies and antioxidant properties of the leaves of Solanum macrocarpon. J Pharm Sci Res 6:1–4Kryvokhyzha D (2014) Whole genome resequencing of Heliconius butterflies revolutionizes our view of the level of admixture between species. MSc Dissertation, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenLester RN, Hasan SMZ (1990) The distinction between Solanum incanum L. and Solanum insanum L. (Solanaceae). Taxon 39:521–523Lester RN, Hasan SMZ (1991) Origin and domestication of the brinjal eggplant, Solanum melongena, from Solanum incanum, in Africa and Asia. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Skelding AD (eds) Solanaceae I: the biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press and Linnean Society of London, London, pp 369–387Levin RA, Myers NR, Bohs L (2006) Phylogenetic relationships among the “spiny Solanum” (Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae). Am J Bot 93:157–169Linnaeus C (1762a) Species plantarum, 2nd edn. Laurent Salvius, StockholmLinnaeus C (1762b) Mantissa plantarum. Laurent Salvius, StockholmMallet J (2005) Hybridization as an invasion of the genome. Trends Ecol Evol 20:229–237Martin SH, Dasmahaptra KK, Nadeau NJ, Salazar C, Walters JR, Simpson F, Blaxter M, Manica A, Mallet J, Jiggins CD (2013) Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Res 23:1817–1828Mayr E (1942) Systematics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New YorkMcNeill J, Barrie FR, Demoulin V, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Marhold K, Prado J, van Reine Prud’homme WF, Smith GF, Weirsema JH, Turland NJ (2012) International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). Regnum Vegetabile 152. Koeltz Scientific Books, KönigsteinMeyer RS, Karol KG, Little DP, Nee MH, Litt A (2012) Phylogeographic relationships among Asian eggplants and new perspectives on eggplant domestication. Mol Phylogenet Evol 63:685–701Meyer RS, Bamshad M, Fuller DQ, Litt A (2014) Comparing medicinal uses of eggplant and related Solanaceae in China, India and the Philippines suggests the independent development of uses, cultural diffusions, and recent species substitutions. Econ Bot 68:137–152Meyer RS, Whitaker BD, Littler DP, Wu SB, Kennelly EJ, Long CL, Litt A (2015) Parallel reduction in phenolic constituents resulting from the domestication of eggplant. Phytochemistry 115:194–206Mittal SP (1950). Studies in non-tuberous species and hybrid of Solanum. M.Sc. Dissertation, I.A.R.I. New DelhiMuñoz-Falcón JE, Prohens J, Vilanova S, Nuez F (2009) Diversity in commercial varieties and landraces of black eggplants and implications for broadening the breeders’ gene. Ann Appl Biol 154:453–465Mutegi E, Snow AA, Rajkumar M, Pasquet R, Ponniah H, Daunay M-C, Davidar P (2015) Genetic diversity and population structure of wild/weedy eggplant (Solanum insanum, Solanaceae) in southern India: implication for conservation. Am J Bot 102:139–147Nee M (1999) Synopsis of Solanum in the New World. In: Nee M, Symon DE, Lester RN, Jessop JP (eds) Solanaceae IV: advances in biology and utilization. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, pp 285–333Nishio T, Sato T, Takayanagi K (1987) Efficient plant regeneration from hypocotyl protoplasts in eggplant (Solanum melongena L. and Solanum insanum L.). Jpn J Breed 37:389–396Novikova PY, Hohmann N, Nizhynska V, Tsuchimatsu T, Ali J, Muir G, Guggisberg A, Paape T, Schmid K, Fedorenko OM, Holm S, Säll T, Schlötterer C, Marhold K, Widmer A, Sese J, Shimuzu KK, Weigel D, Krämer U, Koch MA, Nordborg M (2016) Sequencing of the genus Arabidopsis indentifies a complex history of nonbifurcating speciation and abundant rans-specific polymorphism. Nat Genet. doi: 10.1038/ng.3617Pease JB, Haak DC, Hahn MW, Moyle LC (2016) Phylogenomics reveals three sources of adaptive variation during a rapid radiation. PLoS Biol 14(2):e1002379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002379Plazas M, Andujar I, Vilanova S, Hurtado M, Gramazio P, Herraiz FJ, Prohens J (2013) Breeding for chlorogenic acid content in eggplant: interest and prospects. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 41:26–35Plazas M, Vilanova S, Gramazio P, Rodríguez-Burruezo A, Fita A, Herraiz FJ, Ranil R, Fonseka R, Niran L, Fonseka H, Kouassi B, Kouassi A, Prohens J (2016) Interspecific hybridization between eggplant and wild relatives from different genepools. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 141:34–44Prain D (1903) Solanaceae. Bengal plants, vol 2. Botanical Survey of India, Calcutta, pp 742–753Rai UK (1959) Cytogenetic studies on Solanum melongena L. I. Chromosome morphology. Caryologia 12:299–316Rao BL (1956). Cytomorphological studies on certain interspecific hybrid of non-tuberous Solanum species. M.Sc. Dissertation, University of Madras, IndiaRieseberg L (2009) Evolution: replacing genes and traits through hybridization. Curr Biol 19:R119–R122Roddick JG (1986) Steroidal alkaloids of the Solanaceae. In: D’Arcy WG (ed) Biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Columbia University Press, NewYork, pp 201–222Roxburgh W (1832) Flora indica: or description of Indian plants. Carey’s Edition, LondonSamuels BJ (1996). Solanum incanum sensu lato (Solanaceae): taxonomy, phylogeny and distribution. Ph.D Dissertation, University of BirminghamSamuels J (2010) Taxonomic relationships of eggplant wild relatives in series Incaniformia Bitter. In: Prohens J, Rodriguez-Burruezo A (eds) Advances in genetics and breeding of Capsicum and eggplant. Universitat Politècnica de València, Valencia, pp 89–95Samuels J (2012a) Solanum incanum (Solanaceae): taxonomic relationships between S. incanum, S. campylacanthum, S. panduriforme and S. lichtensteinii. Kew Bull 67:401–411Samuels J (2012b) Genetically engineered Bt brinjal and the implication for plant biodiversity—revisited. http://www.greenpeace.org/seasia/ph/PageFiles/415937/GE-Bt-brinjal-revisited.pdf . Accessed 14 July 2016Samuels J (2013a) Taxonomic notes on several wild relatives of Solanum melongena L. (Solanaceae): comments on Meyer et al. (2012). Mol Phylogenet Evol 67:297–299Samuels J (2013b) An updated look at the taxonomy of the brinjal eggplant complex. In: Lanteri J, Rotino GL (eds) Breakthroughs in the genetics and breeding of Capsicum and eggplant. Comitato per l’organizzazione degli eventi (COE) DISAFA, TorinoSamuels J (2013c) Transgene flow from Bt brinjal: A real risk? Trends Biotechnol 31:332–334Samuels J (2016) Solanum insanum L. (Solanaceae): Linnaean species or introgressed hybrid? In: Prohens J (eds) Proceedings of the XVIth EUCARPIA Capsicum and eggplant meeting. Corvinus University of Budapest, Kecskémet, Hungary, pp 126–139Särkinen T, Bohs L, Olmstead RG, Knapp S (2013) A phylogenetic framework for evolutionary study of the nightshades (Solanaceae): a dated 1000-tip tree. BMC Evol Biol 13: 214. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/13/214Schönbeck-Temesy E (1972) Solanaceae. In: Rechinger KH (ed) Flora Iranica, vol 100. Akademische Druck-und Verlagsanstalt, Graz, pp 1–82Sivarajan VV, Balachandran I (1994) Ayurvedic drugs and their plant sources. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., New DelhiSubasinghe S, Senaratne R, Weerasinghe WIL (2003) Development of effective propagation techniques for Elabatu (Solanum melongena var. insanum). Acad Sess Univ Ruhuna 1:14–18Sulaiman JA, Shree R (2012) Pharmacognostical and phytochemical comparison of roots of Solanum species used in Ayurvedic formulations. Int J Pharmacogn Phytochem Res 4:28–37Swaminathan MS (1949). Cytotaxonomic study in the genus Solanum. M.Sc. Dissertation, I.A.R.I. New Delhi, IndiaSyfert MM, Castañeda-Álvarez NP, Khoury CK, Särkinen T, Sosa CC, Achicanoy HA, Bernau V, Prohens J, Daunay M-C, Knapp S (2016) Crop wild relatives of the brinjal eggplant (Solanum melongena; Solanaceae): poorly represented in genebanks and many species at risk of extinction. Am J Bot 103:635–651. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1500539Vaughan D, Yoshida Y, Takeya M, Tomooka N (2013) Collecting the wild relatives of crops. In: Normah MN, Chin HF, Reed BM (eds) Conservation of tropical plant species. Springer, New York, pp 27–41Vorontsova MS, Knapp S (2012) A new species of Solanum (Solanaceae) from South Africa related to the cultivated eggplant. PhytoKeys 8:1–11Vorontsova MS, Knapp S (2016) A revision of the “spiny solanums”, Solanum subgenus Leptostemonum (Solanaceae) in Africa and Madagascar. Syst Bot Monogr 99:1–436Vorontsova MS, Stern S, Bohs L, Knapp S (2013) African spiny solanum (subgenus Leptostemonum, Solanaceae): a thorny phylogenetic tangle. Bot J Linn Soc 173:176–193Weese TL, Bohs L (2007) A three-gene phylogeny of the genus Solanum (Solanaceae). Syst Bot 32:445–463Weese TL, Bohs L (2010) Eggplant origins: out of Africa, into the Orient. Taxon 59:49–56Wu SB, Meyer RS, Whitaker BD, Litt A, Kennelly EJ (2013) A new liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based strategy to integrate chemistry, morphology, and evolution of eggplant (Solanum) species. J Chromatogr A 1314:154–17

    PCA relationships between morphological traits.

    No full text
    <p>The two first components (PC1 and PC2) of the principal components analysis account for 22.9% and 16.2% of the total variation, respectively. Results were obtained after the characterization of 52 <i>S. melongena</i> accessions from China, Spain, and Sri Lanka using 28 morphological descriptors (see text and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0041748#pone-0041748-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>).</p

    Morphological traits measured in a scale with pre-determined values of the descriptor states, and description of the scale used for the study of morphological variation in the eggplant accessions studied [4], [19], [30].

    No full text
    <p>Morphological traits measured in a scale with pre-determined values of the descriptor states, and description of the scale used for the study of morphological variation in the eggplant accessions studied <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0041748#pone.0041748-MuozFalcn1" target="_blank">[4]</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0041748#pone.0041748-Prohens1" target="_blank">[19]</a>, <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0041748#pone.0041748-vanderWeerden1" target="_blank">[30]</a>.</p

    PCA SSR-based relationships between accessions.

    No full text
    <p>A total of 52 <i>S. melongena</i> accessions from China (white squares), Spain (grey triangles), and Sri Lanka (black circles) (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0041748#pone-0041748-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>) were evaluated using 12 polymorphic SSRs (see text and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0041748#pone-0041748-t003" target="_blank">Tables 3</a> and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0041748#pone-0041748-t005" target="_blank">5</a>) and were represented on the three first components (PC1, PC2 and PC3) of the principal components analysis (22.0%, 19.1%, and 17.9% of the total variation explained by the first, second, and third principal components, respectively). Scatterplots show the projections of the accessions on the first and second principal components (above) and on the first and third principal components (below).</p

    PCA morphology-based relationships between accessions.

    No full text
    <p>A total of 52 <i>S. melongena</i> accessions from China (white squares), Spain (grey triangles), and Sri Lanka (black circles) (<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0041748#pone-0041748-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>) were morphologically evaluated with 28 morphological traits (see text and <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0041748#pone-0041748-t002" target="_blank">Table 2</a>) and were represented on the two first components (PC1 and PC2) of the principal components analysis (22.9% and 16.2% of the total variation explained by the first and second component, respectively).</p

    Total genetic diversity (H<sub>T</sub>), among groups genetic diversity (D<sub>ST</sub>), within groups genetic diversity (H<sub>S</sub>), relative magnitude of genetic differentiation (G<sub>ST</sub>) and standarized G<sub>ST</sub> (G’<sub>ST</sub>), estimated from SSR data for the eggplant accessions according to their origin.

    No full text
    <p>Total genetic diversity (H<sub>T</sub>), among groups genetic diversity (D<sub>ST</sub>), within groups genetic diversity (H<sub>S</sub>), relative magnitude of genetic differentiation (G<sub>ST</sub>) and standarized G<sub>ST</sub> (G’<sub>ST</sub>), estimated from SSR data for the eggplant accessions according to their origin.</p
    corecore