Crosstalk between glial and glioblastoma cells triggers the "go-or-grow" phenotype of tumor cells

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM), the most malignant primary brain tumor, leads to poor and unpredictable clinical outcomes. Recent studies showed the tumor microenvironment has a critical role in regulating tumor growth by establishing a complex network of interactions with tumor cells. In this context, we investigated how GBM cells modulate resident glial cells, particularly their paracrine activity, and how this modulation can influence back on the malignant phenotype of GBM cells. Methods: Conditioned media (CM) of primary mouse glial cultures unexposed (unprimed) or exposed (primed) to the secretome of GL261 GBM cells were analyzed by proteomic analysis. Additionally, these CM were used in GBM cells to evaluate their impact in glioma cell viability, migration capacity and activation of tumor-related intracellular pathways. Results: The proteomic analysis revealed that the pre-exposure of glial cells to CM from GBM cells led to the upregulation of several proteins related to inflammatory response, cell adhesion and extracellular structure organization within the secretome of primed glial cells. At the functional levels, CM derived from unprimed glial cells favored an increase in GBM cell migration capacity, while CM from primed glial cells promoted cells viability. These effects on GBM cells were accompanied by activation of particular intracellular cancer-related pathways, mainly the MAPK/ERK pathway, which is a known regulator of cell proliferation. Conclusions: Together, our results suggest that glial cells can impact on the pathophysiology of GBM tumors, and that the secretome of GBM cells is able to modulate the secretome of neighboring glial cells, in a way that regulates the "go-or-grow" phenotypic switch of GBM cells.Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (IF/00601/2012 to B.M.C.; IF/00111 to A.J.S; SFRH/BD/52287/2013 to A.I.O.; SFRH/BD/81495/2011 to S.I.A.; SFRH/BD/88121/2012 to J.V.C.; projects PTDC/SAU-GMG/113795/2009 to B.M.C.; PTDC/NEU-NMC/0205/2012, PTDC/NEU-SCC/7051/2014, PEst-C/SAU/LA0001/2013–2014 and UID/NEU/04539/2013 to B.M.), Liga Portuguesa Contra o Cancro (B.M.C.), Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian (B.M.C.) and Inter-University Doctoral Programme in Ageing and Chronic Disease (PhDOC; to A.I.O.). Project co-financed by Programa Operacional Regional do Norte (ON.2—O Novo Norte), Quadro de Referência Estratégico Nacional (QREN), Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER), Programa Operacional Factores de Competitividade (COMPETE), and by The National Mass Spectrometry Network (RNEM) under the contract REDE/1506/REM/2005info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Visceral Artery Aneurysms in Liver Transplant Candidates and in Patients after Liver Transplantation

There are only few reviews concerning visceral aneurysms in cirrhotics, and a small number of papers on visceral aneurysms in liver transplant patients. The present paper investigates this condition in both groups of patients in a 10-year-retrospective study

Randomized, phase II study comparing interferon combined 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin hepatic arterial infusion with interferon combined 5-fluorouracil hepatic arterial infusion in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

4588 Background: This randomized phase II trial compared the response rate (RR) of interferon (IFN) combined 5-fluorouracil (5FU) plus cisplatin (CDDP) hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) with IFN combined 5FU HAI in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: Patients (pts) with measurable histologically or radiologically confirmed advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (major vascular invasion and/or bilobular multiple ≥5 nodules) were randomized into 2 groups. Arm A (n=57): continuous 5FU HAI (300mg/m2 day1–5, day8–12), CDDP HAI (20mg/m2, day 1, day 8 for 1.5 hours). IFN alpha-2b (3M IU/body) was administrated intramuscularly 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The treatment cycles repeated for 6 weeks. Arm B (n=57): IFN combined 5FU HAI with same dose without CDDP infusion. Treatment was continued until disease progression. The primary endpoint was RR. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP) and toxicity. Results: Results for responses are presented for 109 pts and toxicity for 114 pts. The best overall response rate (RR) was 46% for group A and 25% for group B. This included 1 (2% of group A) vs. 3 (6% of group B) complete responses, and 25 (44% of group A) vs. 11 (19% of group B) partial responses. Fifteen pts in group A (26%) vs. 19 pts (33%) in group B had stable disease and 13 pts (23%) vs. 22 (39%) in respectively group A and B progressed while on treatment. RR was significantly higher in group A (p=0.02). The median TTP was 6.5 ± 2.0 months (mo) for group A vs. 3.3 ± 2.0 mo for group B (p=0.005). The median OS was 17.6 ± 3.2 mo for group A vs. 10.5 ±2.3 mo for group B (p=0.38). The median OS was 13.7 ± 4.9 mo for both groups. Grade 3/4 toxicity occurred in 65.8% of pts. Hematological toxicity was common and occurred in 53.5%. The thrombocytopenia and infusion port-related toxicity occurred more frequently in group A. Conclusions: IFN combined 5FU plus CDDP HAI shows higher antitumor activity and longer TTP than IFN combined 5FU HAI. Although OS is also longer without significant difference, these results show the clinical efficacy of additional CDDP to IFN combined 5FU HAI. No significant financial relationships to disclose. </jats:p