6 research outputs found
Sources of Airborne Endotoxins in Ambient Air and Exposure of Nearby Communities—A Review
Endotoxin is a bioaerosol component that is known to cause respiratory effects in exposed populations. To date, most research focused on occupational exposure, whilst much less is known about the impact of emissions from industrial operations on downwind endotoxin concentrations. A review of the literature was undertaken, identifying studies that reported endotoxin concentrations in both ambient environments and around sources with high endotoxin emissions. Ambient endotoxin concentrations in both rural and urban areas are generally below 10 endotoxin units (EU) m−3; however, around significant sources such as compost facilities, farms, and wastewater treatment plants, endotoxin concentrations regularly exceeded 100 EU m−3. However, this is affected by a range of factors including sampling approach, equipment, and duration. Reported downwind measurements of endotoxin demonstrate that endotoxin concentrations can remain above upwind concentrations. The evaluation of reported data is complicated due to a wide range of different parameters including sampling approaches, temperature, and site activity, demonstrating the need for a standardised methodology and improved guidance. Thorough characterisation of ambient endotoxin levels and modelling of endotoxin from pollution sources is needed to help inform future policy and support a robust health-based risk assessment process
Recommended from our members
The environmental and biosecurity characteristics of livestock carcass disposal methods: A review
Livestock mortalities represent a major waste stream within agriculture. Many different methods are used throughout the world to dispose of these mortalities; however within the European Union (EU) disposal options are limited by stringent legislation. The legal disposal options currently available to EU farmers (primarily rendering and incineration) are frequently negatively perceived on both practical and economic grounds. In this review, we assess the potential environment impacts and biosecurity risks associated with each of the main options used for disposal of livestock mortalities in the world and critically evaluate the justification for current EU regulations. Overall, we conclude that while current legislation intends to minimise the potential for on-farm pollution and the spread of infectious diseases (e.g. Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies, bacterial pathogens), alternative technologies (e.g. bioreduction, anaerobic digestion) may provide a more cost-effective, practical and biosecure mechanism for carcass disposal as well as having a lower environmental footprint. Further social, environmental and economic research is therefore warranted to assess the holistic benefits of alternative approaches for carcass disposal in Europe, with an aim to provide policy-makers with robust knowledge to make informed decisions on future legislation
Changes in the physicochemical properties and enzymatic activity of waste during bioreduction of pig carcasses
Bioreduction is a novel method for the on-farm storage of fallen stock in a vessel containing water that is heated and aerated, prior to disposal. The combination of a mesophilic temperature and high bacterial population leads to rapid degradation of carcasses due to microbial and enzymatic breakdown of protein material; and ultimately the reduction in volume of waste to be disposed. The system could, however, be improved if more was known about the changes that occur during a bioreduction cycle. Pig carcasses were placed within two commercial-scale bioreduction vessels (BVs) (6.5m3 capacity) and the changes in physicochemical parameters, enzymatic activity, gas emissions and microbial communities were analysed over 56 days. Analyses showed that each vessel displayed different physicochemical parameters. The microbial communities within both vessels were also distinct, though they converged between days 28 and 42 before again diverging. Of the enzymes assayed, acetylesterases showed the highest activity during initial stages, with a subsequent increase in lipase towards the end. All other enzymes showed little activity in comparison. Despite active aeration of the vessels, conditions were redox-constrained, leading to the emission of gases associated with anaerobic conditions, namely NH3 and H2S. It was concluded that no single parameter governed the biochemical processes and that each BV will have its own unique microbial population and hence rate of decomposition. Further work is needed to increase the rate of bioreduction through bioaugmentation or developing enzyme additives
Fate of pathogens in a simulated bioreduction system for livestock carcasses
The EU Animal By-Products Regulations generated the need for novel methods of storage and disposal of dead livestock. Bioreduction prior to rendering or incineration has been proposed as a practical and potentially cost-effective method; however, its biosecurity characteristics need to be elucidated. To address this, Salmonella enterica (serovars Senftenberg and Poona), Enterococcus faecalis, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli and a lux-marked strain of Escherichia coli O157 were inoculated into laboratory-scale bioreduction vessels containing sheep carcass constituents. Numbers of all pathogens and the metabolic activity of E. coli O157 decreased significantly within the liquor waste over time, and only E. faecalis remained detectable after three months. Only very low numbers of Salmonella spp. and E. faecalis were detected in bioaerosols, and only at initial stages of the trial. These results further indicate that bioreduction represents a suitable method of storing and reducing the volume of livestock carcasses prior to ultimate disposal
Bioreduction of Sheep Carcasses Effectively Contains and Reduces Pathogen Levels under Operational and Simulated Breakdown Conditions
Options
for the storage and disposal of animal carcasses are extremely
limited in the EU after the introduction of the EU Animal By-products
Regulations (ABPR; EC/1774/2002), leading to animosity within the
livestock sector and the call for alternative methods to be validated.
Novel storage technologies such as bioreduction may be approved under
the ABPR provided that they can be shown to prevent pathogen proliferation.
We studied the survival of <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i>, <i>Salmonella</i> spp., <i>E. coli</i> O157 and porcine
parvovirus in bioreduction vessels containing sheep carcasses for
approximately 4 months. The vessels were operated under two different
scenarios: (A) where the water within was aerated and heated to 40
°C, and (B) with no aeration or heating, to simulate vessel failure.
Microbial analysis verified that pathogens were contained within the
bioreduction vessel and indeed reduced in numbers with time under
both scenarios. This study shows that bioreduction can provide an
effective and safe on-farm storage system for livestock carcasses
prior to ultimate disposal. The findings support a review of the current
regulatory framework so that bioreduction is considered for approval
for industry use within the EU
A study of the potential release of bioaerosols from containers as a result of reduced frequency residual waste collections
Microorganisms have the potential to grow within waste containers if waste is stored for longer periods as a result of an extended residual waste collection cycle. Release of microorganisms as bioaerosols during waste collection and processing may be an occupational risk to workers within the industry. There may be many constituents of the bioaerosol that may be of concern, however, there are currently only workplace exposure limits proposed for endotoxin (90 EU m-3). A field-scale trial was established to determine the concentration of mesophilic bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, Listeria monocytogenes, thermotolerant fungi, Aspergillus fumigatus, endotoxin and (1→3)-β-D-glucan in air within bins containing either bagged or loose residual waste, in warm (23 °C) or cold (7 °C) conditions, to simulate an extended collection cycle. Fresh waste was added during the first four weeks, with an additional ‘missed collection’ phase of a further four weeks where no more waste was added. A second trial examined the microbiological components of bioaerosols associated with ‘tipping’ the bins, simulating the moment when bins are emptied into waste collection vehicles. The majority of
mesophilic bacteria, fungi and A. fumigatus concentrations were recorded when fresh material was added to the bins, with only mesophilic bacteria recorded up to week 6 during the ‘missed collection’ phase. (1→3)-β-D-glucan concentrations were variable throughout the first trial, (geometric mean range 0.4-13.8 ng m-3). Perhaps the bioaerosol component of most interest was endotoxin (geometric mean range 0.52-1288 EU m-3). Elevated endotoxin concentrations were recorded during the ‘missed collection’ phase of the extended collection cycle and during ‘tipping’. This data demonstrates significant concentrations of bioaerosols and particularly endotoxin can be generated during prolonged residual waste storage and collection. As endotoxin is a bioaerosol component of concern it can be concluded there is the potential for workplace exposure hence identifying key areas for risk assessment