4 research outputs found

    Web-based point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use and quality indicators at Raleigh Fitkin Memorial Hospital in Eswatini and the implications

    Get PDF
    Background: Eswatini is located in Sub-Saharan Africa. There is limited knowledge regarding antimicrobial utilisation among public hospitals across Africa, which is a challenge with rising antimicrobial resistance rates. Objective: To undertake a point prevalence survey (PPS) at Raleigh Fitkin Memorial (RFM) Hospital, the leading regional hospital in Eswatini with the findings driving future programmes. Method: PPS was undertaken at RFM using the Knack web-based application (App) to speed-up data collection, with antimicrobials categorised according to the World Health Organization Access, Watch, and Reserve classification. Each ward was surveyed in one day using patient files. Results: Overall, 68 patient files in 12 wards were surveyed; 88.2% (60/68) received at least one antimicrobial. Prescribed antimicrobials were mainly from the Access group (69.9%), none from the Reserve group. Amoxicillin (24.5%) and ceftriaxone IV (21.6%) were the most prescribed antibiotics. Of concern was that antibiotics were prescribed empirically for all patients (100%) with most administered IV (88.3%; 91/103). In addition, there was no documented switch or stop dates for administered antibiotics or any patient culture or drug sensitivity results recorded. Alongside this, extended courses of antimicrobials were typically administered as part of prophylaxis for surgical patients (80%; 12/15) despite concerns. Conclusion: There were considerable concerns with current antimicrobial use. Identified targets included reducing extended administration for surgical prophylaxis, encouraging earlier switching to oral antimicrobials and undertaking sensitivity testing. In addition, routinely documenting stop dates. The App appreciably reduced data collection times and analysis, and could potentially be used in other low- and middle-income countries

    Response to the Novel Corona Virus (COVID-19) Pandemic Across Africa: Successes, Challenges, and Implications for the Future

    Get PDF
    Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has already claimed considerable lives. There are major concerns in Africa due to existing high prevalence rates for both infectious and non-infectious diseases and limited resources in terms of personnel, beds and equipment. Alongside this, concerns that lockdown and other measures will have on prevention and management of other infectious diseases and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). NCDs are an increasing issue with rising morbidity and mortality rates. The World Health Organization (WHO) warns that a lack of nets and treatment could result in up to 18 million additional cases of malaria and up to 30,000 additional deaths in sub-Saharan Africa. Objective: Document current prevalence and mortality rates from COVID-19 alongside economic and other measures to reduce its spread and impact across Africa. In addition, suggested ways forward among all key stakeholder groups. Our Approach: Contextualise the findings from a wide range of publications including internet-based publications coupled with input from senior-level personnel. Ongoing Activities: Prevalence and mortality rates are currently lower in Africa than among several Western countries and the USA. This could be due to a number of factors including early instigation of lockdown and border closures, the younger age of the population, lack of robust reporting systems and as yet unidentified genetic and other factors. Innovation is accelerating to address concerns with available equipment. There are ongoing steps to address the level of misinformation and its consequences including fines. There are also ongoing initiatives across Africa to start addressing the unintended consequences of COVID-19 activities including lockdown measures and their impact on NCDs including the likely rise in mental health disorders, exacerbated by increasing stigma associated with COVID-19. Strategies include extending prescription lengths, telemedicine and encouraging vaccination. However, these need to be accelerated to prevent increased morbidity and mortality. Conclusion: There are multiple activities across Africa to reduce the spread of COVID-19 and address misinformation, which can have catastrophic consequences, assisted by the WHO and others, which appear to be working in a number of countries. Research is ongoing to clarify the unintended consequences given ongoing concerns to guide future activities. Countries are learning from each other

    A web-based point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use and quality indicators at Raleigh Fitkin Memorial Hospital, Eswatini and the implications

    No full text
    Currently there is limited knowledge regarding antimicrobial utilization patterns among public hospitals in Eswatini. This is a concern given rising resistance rates among African countries. This study aimed to address this by determining antimicrobial utilization patterns using a point prevalence survey (PPS) methodology at Raleigh Fitkin Memorial (RFM) Hospital. The findings would be used to identify potential interventions to improve future antimicrobial utilization. A PPS was conducted using a web-based application (App). Antimicrobials were categorized according to the World Health Organization (WHO) Access, Watch, and Reserve (AWaRe) classification. Each ward in the hospital was surveyed in one day using patient files. All patients in the ward, admitted by 08h30 on the day of the survey, were included. Ethical clearance was granted by the university and Eswatini Ethics. Overall, 68 patient files in 12 wards were surveyed, with 88.2% (60/68) receiving at least one antimicrobial. The most widely prescribed antimicrobials were amoxicillin (24.5%), and ceftriaxone IV (21.6%), mostly from the Access group (69.9%), and zero from the Reserve group. In the past 90 days prior to admission, most patients (60.3%; 41/68) were not receiving any antimicrobials. Of concern was that antimicrobial use was empirical for all patients (100%) with mostly parenteral administration (88.3%; 91/103). In addition, the majority of surgical prophylaxis patients (80%; 12/15) were given an extended course post surgery. There was also no documented switch or stop dates, or patient culture and drug sensitivity results. Antimicrobial utilization is high at RFM hospital. Identified targets for quality improvement programs include encouraging earlier switching to oral antimicrobials, reducing extended use for surgical prophylaxis and encouraging greater sensitivity testing and documentation stop dates. The development of the App appreciably reduced data collection times and analysis, and would be recommended for use in other public hospitals

    Response to the novel corona virus (COVID-19) pandemic across Africa : successes, challenges, and implication for the future

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has already claimed considerable lives. There are major concerns in Africa due to existing high prevalence rates for both infectious and non-infectious diseases and limited resources in terms of personnel, beds and equipment. Alongside this, concerns that lockdown and other measures will have on prevention and management of other infectious diseases and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). NCDs are an increasing issue with rising morbidity and mortality rates. The World Health Organization (WHO) warns that a lack of nets and treatment could result in up to 18 million additional cases of malaria and up to 30,000 additional deaths in sub-Saharan Africa. OBJECTIVE: Document current prevalence and mortality rates from COVID-19 alongside economic and other measures to reduce its spread and impact across Africa. In addition, suggested ways forward among all key stakeholder groups. OUR APPROACH: Contextualise the findings from a wide range of publications including internet-based publications coupled with input from senior-level personnel. ONGOING ACTIVITIES: Prevalence and mortality rates are currently lower in Africa than among several Western countries and the USA. This could be due to a number of factors including early instigation of lockdown and border closures, the younger age of the population, lack of robust reporting systems and as yet unidentified genetic and other factors. Innovation is accelerating to address concerns with available equipment. There are ongoing steps to address the level of misinformation and its consequences including fines. There are also ongoing initiatives across Africa to start addressing the unintended consequences of COVID-19 activities including lockdown measures and their impact on NCDs including the likely rise in mental health disorders, exacerbated by increasing stigma associated with COVID-19. Strategies include extending prescription lengths, telemedicine and encouraging vaccination. However, these need to be accelerated to prevent increased morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION: There are multiple activities across Africa to reduce the spread of COVID-19 and address misinformation, which can have catastrophic consequences, assisted by the WHO and others, which appear to be working in a number of countries. Research is ongoing to clarify the unintended consequences given ongoing concerns to guide future activities. Countries are learning from each other.http://frontiersin.org/Pharmacologypm2021Family MedicineSchool of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH
    corecore