Transitions from Telephone Surveys to Self-Administered and Mixed-Mode Surveys: AAPOR Task Force Report

Telephone surveys have been a ubiquitous method of collecting survey data, but the environment for telephone surveys is changing. Many surveys are transitioning from telephone to self-administration or combinations of modes for both recruitment and survey administration. Survey organizations are conducting these transitions from telephone to mixed modes with only limited guidance from existing empirical literature and best practices. This article summarizes findings by an AAPOR Task Force on how these transitions have occurred for surveys and research organizations in general. We find that transitions from a telephone to a selfadministered or mixed-mode survey are motivated by a desire to control costs, to maintain or improve data quality, or both. The most common mode to recruit respondents when transitioning is mail, but recent mixedmode studies use only web or mail and web together as survey administration modes. Although early studies found that telephone response rates met or exceeded response rates to the self-administered or mixed modes, after about 2013, response rates to the self-administered or mixed modes tended to exceed those for the telephone mode, largely because of a decline in the telephone mode response rates. Transitioning offers opportunities related to improved frame coverage and geographic targeting, delivery of incentives, visual design of an instrument, and cost savings, but challenges exist related to selecting a respondent within a household, length of a questionnaire, differences across modes in use of computerization to facilitate skip patterns and other questionnaire design features, and lack of an interviewer for respondent motivation and clarification. Other challenges related to surveying youth, conducting surveys in multiple languages, collecting nonsurvey data such as biomeasures or consent to link to administrative data, and estimation with multiple modes are also prominent

Flow Cytometric Evaluation of Pregnancy-Induced Anti-Donor Immunization

Background. Living donor kidneys from spouses and children (from offspring to parents) are currently considered to be important organ sources. However, pregnancy-induced alloimmunization may provoke acute rejection episodes after kidney transplantation, being flow cytometry cross-match (FCXM) we studied donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) in the sera of recipients planned for living kidney transplantation from their spouse or children. When the FCXM was positive, we confirmed the existence of anti-human leukocyte antigen (H LA) antibodies using flow cytometry panel-reactive antibody (flow-PRA)

UV curable sulfonated hybrid materials and their performance as proton exchange membranes

In this study 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropanesulfonic acid (AMPS) containing UV curable nanocomposite membranes were prepared by using the sol-gel method. Tetraethylorthosilicate (TEOS), and 3-(methacryloyloxy)propyl trimethoxysilane (MAPTMS) were used, respectively as an inorganic precursor and coupling agent. Cross linking agents such as poly(ethylene glycol diacrylate) (PEGMA) and ethylene glycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA) were used to arrange the mechanical and physical properties of the resulting hybrid membrane. The hybrid formulation polymerized under UV irradiation and the gel percentage, water uptake of the membranes were calculated. The polymerization conversion of the organic part was investigated by using photo-differential scanning calorimetry (photo-DSC). The thermal and mechanical properties of the membranes indicated good stability. The morphological structure of membranes was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In addition proton conductivity and methanol selectivity measurements were performed. The proton conductivity of the AMPS20-SOLGEL30 nanocomposite membrane is about 0.138 S cm(-1) at 50 degrees C. Selectivity toward methanol for the same membrane is very low with a selectivity factor of alpha = 0.032, which satisfies the requirements for DMFC applications. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Flow Cytometric Crossmatching and Panel-Reactive Antibodies in Chronic Renal Failure Patients

Aim. Anti-donor antibodies, denoted as "panel-reactive antibodies" (PRAs), are one of the most important factors influencing graft survival after renal transplantation. PRA is generally analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or flow cytometry (FC), which identify the HLA antigen specific for the preformed antibody