Description of nestbox visits and suckling events in a group housing system for rabbit does as compared to individual cages

[EN] Research was conducted to study nursing associated events of lactating rabbit does. Nest box visits and suckling events were investigated using 6 group pens (8 does/pen) and 12 enriched individual cages. Each group pen and individual cage was observed by video for one day per week until weaning at 35 d of lactation, with exception of the third week of lactation. In the first 2 wk of lactation, videotapes were analysed for the frequency and duration of nest box visits per day. The fourth and fifth week of lactation, suckling events on the floor of the group pens and nest box visits in the individual cages were analysed for one day per week. The first 2 wk of lactation, does visits to the nest boxes were less frequent (respectively 1.9±0.2 vs. 2.6±0.3, P24 h between nest box visits. In the cages, all does visited the nest boxes at least once a day. In the last 2 wk of lactation, in the group pens suckling duration (mean±standard deviation) was 89±49 and 92.2±37 s in respectively week 4 and 5. In 79% of the suckling events a mix of the does¿ own and other kits were suckled. No difference was found in suckling duration between litters consisting of own and/or other kits. Thirty-two per cent of the does in week 4 and 62% of the does in week 5 did not suckle kits on the floor of the pen, whereas all the does in the cages still visited the nest boxes at least once every 24 h. Based on this study, it can be concluded that in group housing less frequent and shorter nest box visits as well as suckling events were found as compared to individual housing.Rommers, JM.; Kemp, B.; Houwers, H.; Gunnink, H.; De Jong, IC. (2012). Description of nestbox visits and suckling events in a group housing system for rabbit does as compared to individual cages. World Rabbit Science. 20(4):231-240. doi:10.4995/wrs.2012.1231SWORD23124020

Het effect van twice-a-day-feeding en splitfeeding op reproductie, eischaalkwaliteit en gedrag van vleeskuikenouderdieren

In dit rapport worden de resultaten gepresenteerd van een studie naar het toepassen van split-feeding (= verschillend ochtend- en middagvoer) en twice-a-day-feeding (= 2 keer per dag eenzelfde standaard voer) ten opzichte van eenmaal daags voeren (standaard voer) bij vleeskuikenouderdieren tijdens de late legperiode (van 45-65 weken leeftijd). Dit experiment is uitgevoerd in opdracht van het Consortium Breeders In Technology (BITe) en het Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuur en Voedselkwaliteit. Uit het onderzoek blijkt dat de dieren die het split-feeding programma volgden tussen 45 en 65 weken leeftijd een hogere productie en lagere uitval hadden. Daarnaast werden bij de tweemaal daags gevoerde dieren (twice-a-day-feeding en split-feeding) een lagere wateropname en lagere water/voer-verhouding gevonden. Het toepassen van tweemaal daags voeren (twice-a-day-feeding en split-feeding) had nauwelijks effect op broedeikwaliteit en geen effect op de broederijresultaten. Bij de tweemaal ten opzichte van eenmaal daags gevoerde dieren werd een ander gedragspatroon gedurende de dag waargenomen. De tweemaal daags gevoerde dieren kregen tweemaal daags een halve portie voer, hetgeen de belangrijkste factor was voor de verschillen in het gedragspatroon. Het was niet helemaal eenduidig maar de tweemaal daags gevoerde dieren (twice-a-day-feeding en split-feeding) vertoonden in gemiddeld: minder drinken, meer staan, minder zitten, meer lopen en minder foerageren

Early life environment affects behavior, welfare, gut microbiome composition, and diversity in broiler chickens

This study aimed to identify whether early-life conditions in broiler chickens could affect their behavior and welfare, and whether or not this was associated with an altered gut microbiome composition or diversity. Broilers were tested in a 2 x 2 factorial design with hatching conditions [home pen (OH) or at the hatchery (HH)] and enrichment (dark brooder (EE) or no brooder (NE) until 14 days of age) as factors (N = 6 per treatment combination). Microbiota composition was measured in the jejunum on days (d) 7, 14, and 35 and in pooled fecal samples on day 14. A novel environment test (NET) was performed on days 1 and 11, and the behavior was observed on days 6, 13, and 33. On day 35, composite asymmetry was determined and footpad dermatitis and hock burn were scored. In their home pen, HH showed more locomotion than OH (P = 0.05), and NE were sitting more and showed more comfort behavior than EE at all ages (P <0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). On days 6 and 13 NE showed more eating and litter pecking while sitting, but on day 33 the opposite was found (age*enrichment: P = 0.05 and P <0.01, respectively). On days 1 and 11, HH showed more social reinstatement in the NET than OH, and EE showed more social reinstatement than NE (P <0.05). Composite asymmetry scores were lower for EE than NE (P <0.05). EE also had less footpad dermatitis and hock burn than NE (P <0.001). Within OH, NE had a more diverse fecal and jejunal microbiome compared to EE on day 14 (feces: observed richness: P = 0.052; jejunum: observed richness and Shannon: P <0.05); the principal component analysis (PCA) showed differences between NE and EE within both HH and OH in fecal samples on day 14, as well as significant differences in bacterial genera such as Lactobacillus and Lachnospiraceae (P <0.05). On day 35, PCA in jejunal samples only showed a trend (P = 0.068) for differences between NE vs. EE within the OH. In conclusion, these results suggest that especially the dark brooder affected the behavior and had a positive effect on welfare as well as affected the composition and diversity of the microbiome. Whether or not the behavior was modulated by the microbiome or vice versa remains to be investigated

Diet dilution and feeding frequency have only minor effects on the behaviour of broiler breeder pullets

During the rearing period, broiler breeders are feed restricted to prevent the negative impact of fast growth and high body weight on health and reproduction. Feed restriction causes frustration and stress, resulting in stereotypic pecking and hyperactivity. Nutritional strategies have the potential to reduce these welfare issues. Using a 2 × 2 factorial completely randomized block design, pullets were fed with two diet densities and two feeding frequencies during rearing. From 3–23 weeks of age (WOA), pullets received either a standard control diet (CON) or a 16% diluted diet (DIL) containing oat hulls. These diets were provided either once (FO) or twice (FT) a day. After 23 WOA, all pullets received the same standard layer diet once a day. Home pen behaviour was observed by scan sampling at 5, 10, 15, 20, 30 and 39 WOA over eight observation sessions. Furthermore, pullets were subjected to Novel Food Tests (12 and 17 WOA) and Novel Object Tests (5, 10, 15 and 20 WOA). Minor treatment effects were found for foraging and sitting behaviour that varied with age during rearing. Feeding frequency influenced the behavioural patterns of all home pen behaviours (P < 0.001; object pecking P = 0.034), while diet dilution only affected the expression of foraging behaviour during the day (P = 0.007). In all treatment groups, many pullets were observed standing and walking in anticipation of the first meal. After the first meal and before the second meal, more FT pullets were observed standing and walking, while during and after the second meal more FO pullets were observed sitting and performing comfort behaviour. Feeding twice a day resulted in lower daily peaks in drinking behaviour. In the laying period, when all birds received the same layer diet at the same frequency, those who were fed twice daily during rearing foraged more than those who were fed once (P = 0.028) and birds that received a diluted diet during rearing tended to drink more than birds that received the control diet (P = 0.083). Few treatment effects were found in the Novel Food and Novel Object Tests, indicating that diet dilution and/or feeding frequency, as applied here, did not affect fearful behaviour or the motivation to explore. In conclusion, this study showed that neither diet dilution, twice-daily feeding, or the combination of these, improved broiler breeder welfare during rearing and laying. Some changes in the pattern of home pen behaviour were found that indicated a response to the frequency of food provisioning

Effects of on-farm and traditional hatching on welfare, health, and performance of broiler chickens

In on-farm hatching systems, eggs that have been incubated for 18 D are transported to the broiler farm. After hatching around day 21, the chicks have immediate access to feed and water. By contrast, traditionally hatched chicks are in early life exposed to dust and pathogens in the hatcher, handling procedures, and transport and remain without feed and water until they have arrived on the farm 1 to 3 D after hatching. We compared welfare and performance of on-farm hatched (OH) and traditionally hatched control (C) Ross 308 broiler chickens from day 0 to 40, housed under semicommercial conditions. The experiment included 3 production cycles in 4 rooms, with each room containing 1 OH and 1 C pen with 1,150 chickens in each pen. Per cycle, C and OH chicks were from the same batch of eggs of 1 parent stock flock. Day-old chick quality was worse for OH than C chickens (hock and navel score; P < 0.05). On-farm hatched chickens were heavier than C chickens until day 21 of age (P < 0.05). Total mortality was significantly lower in OH compared with C pens (P < 0.05). A tendency for lower footpad dermatitis scores was found in OH pens compared with C pens (P < 0.10), probably because of the dryer litter in OH than C pens (P < 0.05). No differences between treatments were found in gait, hock burn, cleanliness, and injury scores, and no or only minor, short lasting differences were found in pathology and intestinal histology. In conclusion, the present study showed that on-farm hatching may be beneficial for broiler welfare, as it reduced total mortality and resulted in dryer litter which is known to be beneficial for reducing footpad dermatitis.</p

Image_1_Early life environment affects behavior, welfare, gut microbiome composition, and diversity in broiler chickens.pdf

This study aimed to identify whether early-life conditions in broiler chickens could affect their behavior and welfare, and whether or not this was associated with an altered gut microbiome composition or diversity. Broilers were tested in a 2 x 2 factorial design with hatching conditions [home pen (OH) or at the hatchery (HH)] and enrichment (dark brooder (EE) or no brooder (NE) until 14 days of age) as factors (N = 6 per treatment combination). Microbiota composition was measured in the jejunum on days (d) 7, 14, and 35 and in pooled fecal samples on day 14. A novel environment test (NET) was performed on days 1 and 11, and the behavior was observed on days 6, 13, and 33. On day 35, composite asymmetry was determined and footpad dermatitis and hock burn were scored. In their home pen, HH showed more locomotion than OH (P = 0.05), and NE were sitting more and showed more comfort behavior than EE at all ages (P *enrichment: P = 0.05 and P <0.01, respectively). On days 1 and 11, HH showed more social reinstatement in the NET than OH, and EE showed more social reinstatement than NE (P <0.05). Composite asymmetry scores were lower for EE than NE (P <0.05). EE also had less footpad dermatitis and hock burn than NE (P <0.001). Within OH, NE had a more diverse fecal and jejunal microbiome compared to EE on day 14 (feces: observed richness: P = 0.052; jejunum: observed richness and Shannon: P <0.05); the principal component analysis (PCA) showed differences between NE and EE within both HH and OH in fecal samples on day 14, as well as significant differences in bacterial genera such as Lactobacillus and Lachnospiraceae (P <0.05). On day 35, PCA in jejunal samples only showed a trend (P = 0.068) for differences between NE vs. EE within the OH. In conclusion, these results suggest that especially the dark brooder affected the behavior and had a positive effect on welfare as well as affected the composition and diversity of the microbiome. Whether or not the behavior was modulated by the microbiome or vice versa remains to be investigated.</p

Fast- and slower-growing broilers respond similarly to a reduction in stocking density with regard to gait, hock burn, skin lesions, cleanliness, and performance

ABSTRACT: There is an increasing trend toward broiler production systems with higher welfare requirements. Breed and stocking density are considered key factors for broiler welfare that are often specified as criteria for such higher welfare systems. However, it remains unknown how slower-growing broilers respond to a reduction in stocking density with regard to their welfare and performance, and whether this response differs from fast-growing broilers. Therefore, we compared fast- (F) and slower-growing broilers (S) housed at 4 different stocking densities (24, 30, 36, and 42 kg/m2, based on slaughter weight) and measured their welfare scores (i.e., gait, footpad dermatitis, hock burn, skin lesions and cleanliness), litter quality and performance. The experiment had a 2 × 4 factorial design with 4 replicates (pens) per treatment (32 pens in total). Thinning (15%) was done in a 50/50 male/female ratio at 38 (F) and 44 (S) d of age (estimated body weight of 2.2 kg). We hypothesized that breeds would respond differently to a reduction in stocking density. Contrary to our hypothesis, only one interaction between breed and stocking density was found on footpad dermatitis, indicating that fast- and slower-growing broilers generally showed similar responses to a reduction in stocking density. F broilers showed a steeper decline in the prevalence of footpad dermatitis with reducing stocking density compared to S broilers. Broilers housed at lower stocking densities (24 and/or 30 kg/m2) showed improved welfare measures, litter quality and performance compared to those housed at higher stocking densities (36 and/or 42 kg/m2). S broilers had better welfare scores (gait, footpad dermatitis and skin lesions), litter quality and lower performance compared to F broilers. In conclusion, reducing stocking density improved welfare of both F and S broilers, but more for F broilers in case of footpad dermatitis, and using S broilers improved welfare compared to F broilers. Reducing stocking density and using slower-growing broilers benefits broiler welfare, where combining both would further improve broiler welfare

Image_2_Early life environment affects behavior, welfare, gut microbiome composition, and diversity in broiler chickens.pdf

This study aimed to identify whether early-life conditions in broiler chickens could affect their behavior and welfare, and whether or not this was associated with an altered gut microbiome composition or diversity. Broilers were tested in a 2 x 2 factorial design with hatching conditions [home pen (OH) or at the hatchery (HH)] and enrichment (dark brooder (EE) or no brooder (NE) until 14 days of age) as factors (N = 6 per treatment combination). Microbiota composition was measured in the jejunum on days (d) 7, 14, and 35 and in pooled fecal samples on day 14. A novel environment test (NET) was performed on days 1 and 11, and the behavior was observed on days 6, 13, and 33. On day 35, composite asymmetry was determined and footpad dermatitis and hock burn were scored. In their home pen, HH showed more locomotion than OH (P = 0.05), and NE were sitting more and showed more comfort behavior than EE at all ages (P *enrichment: P = 0.05 and P <0.01, respectively). On days 1 and 11, HH showed more social reinstatement in the NET than OH, and EE showed more social reinstatement than NE (P <0.05). Composite asymmetry scores were lower for EE than NE (P <0.05). EE also had less footpad dermatitis and hock burn than NE (P <0.001). Within OH, NE had a more diverse fecal and jejunal microbiome compared to EE on day 14 (feces: observed richness: P = 0.052; jejunum: observed richness and Shannon: P <0.05); the principal component analysis (PCA) showed differences between NE and EE within both HH and OH in fecal samples on day 14, as well as significant differences in bacterial genera such as Lactobacillus and Lachnospiraceae (P <0.05). On day 35, PCA in jejunal samples only showed a trend (P = 0.068) for differences between NE vs. EE within the OH. In conclusion, these results suggest that especially the dark brooder affected the behavior and had a positive effect on welfare as well as affected the composition and diversity of the microbiome. Whether or not the behavior was modulated by the microbiome or vice versa remains to be investigated.</p