Effects of Pentoxifylline and Alprostadil on Ocular Hemodynamics in Healthy Humans

PURPOSE. Alprostadil, a prostaglandin (PG)E 1 analogue and pentoxifylline, an alkylxanthine derivate, have been shown to exert vasodilatory effects in several vascular beds. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of PGE 1 and pentoxifylline on the ocular circulation. METHODS. A placebo-controlled, double-masked, three-way, crossover study was performed in 15 healthy male subjects. Subjects received pentoxifylline (300 mg), PGE 1 (alprostadil 60 g), or placebo intravenously over 2 hours on three trial days. Choroidal red blood cell flow was assessed with laser Doppler flowmetry and pulsatile choroidal blood flow with laser interferometric measurement of fundus pulsation amplitude (FPA). Retinal blood cell flow was calculated based on the measurements of maximum erythrocyte velocity in a retinal vein assessed with bidirectional laser Doppler velocimetry, and diameter measurements of retinal vessels were obtained with a retinal vessel analyzer. RESULTS. Pentoxifylline increased FPA by 15.4% Ϯ 1.1% (P Ͻ 0.001 versus placebo and baseline). Alprostadil tended to increase FPA, but this effect did not reach the level of significance (P ϭ 0.07 versus placebo). Choroidal blood flow as measured with laser Doppler flowmetry tended to increase during pentoxifylline and PGE 1 infusion by 8.9% Ϯ 2.9% (P ϭ 0.062) and 4.5% Ϯ 6.2% (P ϭ 0.29), respectively, but none of these effects was significant. The drugs under study had no effect on mean red blood cell velocity in retinal veins, on retinal vessel diameters, intraocular pressure, blood pressure, or pulse rate. CONCLUSIONS. PGE 1 did not alter the parameters of retinal or choroidal circulation in healthy subjects. Pentoxifylline increased FPA, but did not change choroidal blood flow as measured with laser Doppler flowmetry and did not affect retinal blood flow parameters. Accordingly, neither pentoxifylline nor PGE 1 appears to be suitable to improve ocular blood flow in healthy subjects. Whether long-term treatment with alprostadil would improve choroidal blood flow in patients with vascular disease remains to be established. (Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

Updated consensus statement on the use of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Background Since initial approval for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), rituximab has been evaluated in clinical trials involving various populations with RA. Information has also been gathered from registries. This report therefore updates the 2007 consensus document on the use of rituximab in the treatment of RA. Methods Preparation of this new document involved many international experts experienced in the treatment of RA. Following a meeting to agree upon the core agenda, a systematic literature review was undertaken to identify all relevant data. Data were then interrogated by a drafting committee, with subsequent review and discussion by a wider expert committee leading to the formulation of an updated consensus statement. These committees also included patients with RA. Results The new statement covers wide-ranging issues including the use of rituximab in earlier RA and impact on structural progression, and aspects particularly pertinent to rituximab such as co-medication, optimal dosage regimens, repeat treatment cycles and how to manage non-response. Biological therapy following rituximab usage is also addressed, and safety concerns including appropriate screening for hepatitis, immunoglobulin levels and infection risk. This consensus statement will support clinicians and inform patients when using B-cell depletion in the management of RA, providing up-to-date information and highlighting areas for further research. Conclusion New therapeutic strategies and treatment options for RA, a chronic destructive and disabling disease, have expanded over recent years. These have been summarised in general strategic suggestions and specific management recommendations, emphasising the importance of expedient disease-modifying antirheumatic drug implementation and tight disease control. This consensus statement is in line with these fundamental principles of management

Accurate detection of changes in disease activity in primary sjögren's syndrome by the european league against rheumatism sjögren's syndrome disease activity index

Objective. To assess and compare the sensitivity to change of the European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI) with that of other primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) disease activity indexes. Methods. We abstracted 96 patient profiles, including data on 3 successive visits (visits 1-3), from the medical charts of patients with primary SS. Patient profiles were scored with the ESSDAI, SS Disease Activity Index (SSDAI), and Sjögren's Systemic Clinical Activity Index (SCAI). Thirty-nine experts assessed 5 profiles for whether disease activity had improved, worsened, or remained stable at visits 2 and 3. Results. For improved patients, the standardized response means (SRMs) for all scores did not differ, and ranged from -1.08 to -1.38 between visits 1 and 2 and from -0.50 to -0.76 between visits 2 and 3. For patients with worsened activity, the SRMs between visits 1 and 2 and between visits 2 and 3 were +0.46 and +1.10 for the ESSDAI, -0.03 and +0.79 for the SSDAI, and +0.17 and +1.02 for the SCAI, respectively. For patients with stable activity, the SRMs between visits 1 and 2 and between visits 2 and 3 were 0.00 and -0.13 for the ESSDAI, -0.44 and -0.11 for the SSDAI, and -0.36 and +0.34 for the SCAI, respectively. Conclusion. For patients with improved activity, the 3 disease activity indexes showed similar, large sensitivity to change. However, the ESSDAI seemed to detect changes in activity more accurately than other disease activity indexes. Notably, for patients with stable activity, the ESSDAI did not show erroneous improvement. © 2010, American College of Rheumatology