Manufactured Exoticism and Retelling The Story of a Crime: The Case of Sjöwall and Wahlöö’s Reception in France

Between 1965 and 1975 Swedish writer couple Maj Sjöwall and Per Wahlöö wrote a series of ten police procedurals, to which they gave the collective title The Story of a Crime [Roman om ett brott]. The idea behind the decalogue was to employ the crime novel ‘as a scalpel to slit up the belly of the ideologically pauperised and morally debatable so-called welfare state of the bourgeois type’ (Wahlöö 1967, p. 176, my translation) and to formulate a Marxist critique of successive Swedish Social-Democratic governments’ flirtation with capitalism (Lind 2012). The generic template would allow the critique to be accessible to readers from all social layers and educational backgrounds, and show international readers the downsides of the embellished image of ‘the Swedish model’, largely created by Sweden’s ‘talented PR man […] Olof Palme’, as Sjöwall explains in a recent interview (Lind 2012). While this was a didactic and highly politicised literary project, the engagement of French publishing and media with translations of The Story of a Crime suggests different considerations. The reception of these writers in France is simultaneously symptomatic of an ongoing international branding of the contemporary Nordic crime novel and — when investigated in a historical perspective — revelatory of specific internal conditions within the localised cultural setting of this host country

Reflections on conspicuous sustainability: Creating Small Island Dependent States (SIDS) through Ostentatious Development Assistance (ODA)?

It is frequently noted that small islands, including Small Island Developing States (SIDS), receive hugely disproportionate levels of aid or official development assistance (ODA) relative to other states and territories. However, the precise relationship between 'islandness' and aid remains underexamined. This paper uses the concept of 'conspicuous sustainability' as a framework for understanding the propensity for aid to be directed toward small island territories. We argue (1) that aid donors have reasons for preferring engagement in development projects that are particularly conspicuous, irrespective of actual development outcomes and (2) that small island territories are exceptionally well-placed to produce such conspicuousness. We use the case of the construction of the 'climate-resilient' Dominica label following Hurricane Maria in 2017 to illustrate how both aid donors and recipients can be motivated to pursue short-term projects aimed at currently fashionable areas in the field of development (such as climate change resilience) instead of addressing areas with greater potential to foster lasting improvements and built local capacity. We ultimately recommend a greater awareness of the false economies of conspicuous ODA and aid

Island geographies of separation and cohesion: The Coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic and the geopolitics of Kalaallit Nunaat (Greenland)

Kalaallit Nunaat (Greenland) is an Arctic highly autonomous subnational island jurisdiction (SNIJ) of Denmark, its former coloniser. The coronavirus (COVID‐19) pandemic of 2020 has influenced both Kalaallit Nunaat’s relations with the outside world and relations between people and places within the territory. The Kalaallit Nunaat government’s response to the pandemic, including both internal and external travel bans and restrictions on movement, has focused on eradicating the disease from the territory. This strategy, however, is challenged both by the SNIJ’s economic reliance on Denmark and by the Danish government’s own strategy of mitigating the disease. This paper explores the ways in which the coronavirus pandemic has altered how the people of Kalaallit Nunaat interact with the people of Denmark and with one another, ultimately shedding light on the relationship between islands, disease, and geopolitics more generally

Critical reflexivity and decolonial methodology in islandstudies: interrogating the scholar within

Although the field of island studies has from the start regarded itself as a defender of islands and islander interests, it is entangled in coloniality. This editorial focuses on issues of power, knowledge, and position. Who wields power in island studies? Who knows about islands? Where is island studies located, and how does it position itself? The paper discusses problems such as tokenism and forced inclusions, denial and circumscription of expertise, and onto-epistemological discrimination and hegemony within island studies. Ultimately, the paper advances the need for critical reflexivity and decolonial methodology within island studies, for pluralistic approaches to inclusivity and recognition of epistemic differences.Asian Studie

Island Smart Eco-Cities: Innovation, Secessionary Enclaves, and the Selling of Sustainability

Governments and developers around the globe are exploiting the benefits of island spatiality to sell urban sustainability. Many new-build smart cities, eco-cities, and sustainable cities (‘smart eco-cities’) are constructed on small islands or otherwise bounded from surrounding urban space. Island spatiality presents benefits for selling smart eco-cities as role models of sustainable innovation: ease of creating value, ease of measuring sustainability, and ease of communicating success. These benefits, however, are all largely illusory, contributing primarily to the appearance of sustainability for the sake of economic profit. The great innovation of island smart-cities is frequently an innovation in the selling of sustainability. By monetising the environment through ecosystem services, incentivising largely symbolic ‘green’ projects and architecture, drawing attention away from unsustainable practices elsewhere, and exacerbating social inequality, island smart eco-cities may be making the world less sustainable. They may also be unreproducible by design and lead to a global devaluing of genuinely sustainable but non-iconic urban development. Island smart eco-cities increasingly serve as secessionary enclaves for a global elite, privileging corporate over public interests and spearheading an invidious argument of sustainable development by deregulation

Validity and completeness of rheumatoid arthritis diagnoses in the nationwide DANBIO clinical register and the Danish National Patient Registry

Else Helene Ibfelt,1 Jan Sørensen,2,3 Dorte V Jensen,4,5 Lene Dreyer,5,6 Berit Schiøttz‑Christensen,7 Pia H Thygesen,8 Ada Colic,9 Johnny L Raun,10 Natalia Manilo,11 Anne Rødgaard,4 Uta E Poulsen,12 Claus Rasmussen,13 Torben Hansen,14 Babara Unger,15 Randi Pelck,16 Anita Kincses,17 Henrik Nordin,18 Tove Lorenzen,19 Ali Theibich,20 Inger Marie Jensen Hansen,21 Jakob Espesen,22 Jolanta Grydehøj,23 Mette Holland-Fischer,24 Anne Gitte Loft,25 Merete Lund Hetland4,26 1Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Capital Region of Denmark, Rigshospitalet – Glostrup, Denmark; 2Centre of Health Economics Research, Institute of Public health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; 3Healthcare Outcome Research Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland; 4DANBiO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet – Glostrup, Glostrup, 5Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, 6The Parker Institute, Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospital, Frederiksberg, 7Spine Centre of Southern Denmark, Hospital Lillebaelt, Middelfart, 8Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, 9Department of Rheumatology, Sydvestjysk Sygehus, Esbjerg/Grintsted, 10Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, SLB – Fredericia Hospital, Fredericia, 11Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, 12Department of Rheumatology, Gigthospital Gråsten, Gråsten, 13Clinic of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology, Regionshospital Nordjylland, Hjørring, 14Department of Rheumatology, Holbæk sygehus, Holbæk, 15Department of Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, Hospitalsenheden Horsens, Horsens, 16Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, 17Department of Rheumatology, Nordsjællands Hospitaler, Hillerød, 18Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, 19Department of Rheumatology, Silkeborg Regional Hospital and University Clinic, Silkeborg, 20Department of Rheumatology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, 21Department of Rheumatology and University of Southern Denmark, Svendborg Hospital, Odense, 22Department of Internal Medicine, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, 23Department of Rheumatology, Regional Hospital, West Jutland, Herning, 24Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Ålborg, 25Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, 26Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark Objectives: In Denmark, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are registered in the nationwide clinical DANBIO quality register and the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR). The aim was to study the validity of the RA diagnosis and to estimate the completeness of relevant RA cases in each registry.Study design and setting: Patients registered for the first time in 2011 with a diagnosis of RA were identified in DANBIO and DNPR in January 2013. For DNPR, filters were applied to reduce false-positive cases. The diagnosis was verified by a review of patient records. We calculated the positive predictive values (PPVs) of the RA diagnosis registrations in DANBIO and DNPR, and estimated the registry completeness of relevant RA cases for both DANBIO and DNPR. Updated data from 2011 to 2015 from DANBIO were retrieved to identify patients with delayed registration, and the registry completeness and PPV was recalculated.Results: We identified 1,678 unique patients in DANBIO or in DNPR. The PPV (2013 dataset) was 92% in DANBIO and 79% in DNPR. PPV for DANBIO on the 2015 update was 96%. The registry completeness of relevant RA cases was 43% in DANBIO, increasing to 91% in the 2015 update and 90% in DNPR.Conclusion: DANBIO held a high proportion of true RA cases (96%) and was found to be superior to the DNPR (79%) with regard to the validity of the diagnosis. Both registries were estimated to have a high completeness of RA cases treated in hospital care (~90%). Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis, validity, incidence, clinical registry, Denmar