24 research outputs found

    Neural substrates of individual differences in human fear learning: Evidence from concurrent fMRI, fear-potentiated startle, and US-expectancy data

    Get PDF
    To provide insight into individual differences in fear learning, we examined the emotional and cognitive expressions of discriminative fear conditioning in direct relation to its neural substrates. Contrary to previous behavioral–neural (fMRI) research on fear learning—in which the emotional expression of fear was generally indexed by skin conductance—we used fear-potentiated startle, a more reliable and specific index of fear. While we obtained concurrent fear-potentiated startle, neuroimaging (fMRI), and US-expectancy data, healthy participants underwent a fear-conditioning paradigm in which one of two conditioned stimuli (CS(+) but not CS(–)) was paired with a shock (unconditioned stimulus [US]). Fear learning was evident from the differential expressions of fear (CS(+) > CS(–)) at both the behavioral level (startle potentiation and US expectancy) and the neural level (in amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, and insula). We examined individual differences in discriminative fear conditioning by classifying participants (as conditionable vs. unconditionable) according to whether they showed successful differential startle potentiation. This revealed that the individual differences in the emotional expression of discriminative fear learning (startle potentiation) were reflected in differential amygdala activation, regardless of the cognitive expression of fear learning (CS–US contingency or hippocampal activation). Our study provides the first evidence for the potential of examining startle potentiation in concurrent fMRI research on fear learning

    Improvements in simulation tools to be developed within the framework of the ASTRID project

    No full text
    International audienceThe ASTRID design comprises innovative features compared to past designs. The simulation tools being very important to support the ASTRID design option selection and to assist a robust Safety demonstration, the CEA and its industrial partners have launched a large program for developing a new generation of simulation tools. Within the framework of the ASTRID project, the strategy for simulation is to continuously improve the simulation tools and their verification and validation (VetV). Furthermore, this new generation of tools is implemented for the basic design of ASTRID in compliance with the regulatory and schedule requirements. Several examples of computation tool developments in the fields of neutronics, fuel behavior, core mechanics, thermal-hydraulics and severe accident analyses are given. The VetV process, described here for the core studies, is also carried out for others domains by the industrial partners.The approach is closely linked to the realization of the RandD experimental programs, aimed to complete the existing experimental data base and so to validate the new model developments and to decrease the calculation uncertainties. The development program of new simulation tools is ambitious in order to meet the challenges which arise from the innovative design options implemented in ASTRID and for the will to comply with the objectives of the 4th generation reactors

    Heart–Brain Interactions in the MR Environment: Characterization of the Ballistocardiogram in EEG Signals Collected During Simultaneous fMRI

    No full text
    The ballistocardiographic (BCG) artifact is linked to cardiac activity and occurs in electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings acquired inside the magnetic resonance (MR) environment. Its variability in terms of amplitude, waveform shape and spatial distribution over subject’s scalp makes its attenuation a challenging task. In this study, we aimed to provide a detailed characterization of the BCG properties, including its temporal dependency on cardiac events and its spatio-temporal dynamics. To this end, we used high-density EEG data acquired during simultaneous functional MR imaging in six healthy volunteers. First, we investigated the relationship between cardiac activity and BCG occurrences in the EEG recordings. We observed large variability in the delay between ECG and subsequent BCG events (ECG–BCG delay) across subjects and non-negligible epoch-by-epoch variations at the single subject level. The inspection of spatial–temporal variations revealed a prominent non-stationarity of the BCG signal. We identified five main BCG waves, which were common across subjects. Principal component analysis revealed two spatially distinct patterns to explain most of the variance (85% in total). These components are possibly related to head rotation and pulse-driven scalp expansion, respectively. Our results may inspire the development of novel, more effective methods for the removal of the BCG, capable of isolating and attenuating artifact occurrences while preserving true neuronal activity
    corecore