Deletion of Interleukin-4 Receptor Alpha-Responsive Keratinocytes in BALB/c Mice Does Not Alter Susceptibility to Cutaneous Leishmaniasis.

The skin microenvironment at the site of infection plays a role in the early events that determine protective T helper 1/type 1 immune responses during cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) infection. During CL in nonhealing BALB/c mice, early interleukin-4 (IL-4) can instruct dendritic cells for protective Th1 immunity. Additionally, keratinocytes, which are the principal cell type in the skin epidermis, have been shown to secrete IL-4 early after Leishmania major infection. Here, we investigated whether IL-4/IL-13 signaling via the common IL-4 receptor alpha chain (IL-4Rα) on keratinocytes contributes to susceptibility during experimental CL. To address this, keratinocyte-specific IL-4Rα-deficient (KRT14 <sup>cre</sup> IL-4Rα <sup>-/lox</sup> ) mice on a BALB/c genetic background were generated by gene targeting and site-specific recombination (Cre/loxP) under the control of the keratinocyte-specific krt14 locus. Following high-dose infection with L. major IL-81 and LV39 promastigotes subcutaneously in the footpad, footpad swelling, parasite burden, IFN-γ/IL-4/IL-13 cytokine production, and type 1 and type 2 antibody responses were similar between KRT14 <sup>cre</sup> IL-4Rα <sup>-/lox</sup> and littermate control IL-4Rα <sup>-/lox</sup> BALB/c mice. An intradermal infection with low-dose L. major IL-81 and LV39 promastigotes in the ear showed results in infected KRT14 <sup>cre</sup> IL-4Rα <sup>-/lox</sup> BALB/c mice similar to those of littermate control IL-4Rα <sup>-/lox</sup> BALB/c mice, with the exception of a significant decrease observed in parasite burden only at the site of LV39 infection in the ear. Collectively, our results show that autocrine and paracrine signaling of IL-4/IL-13 through the IL-4Rα chain on keratinocytes does not influence the establishment of a nonhealing Th2 immune response in BALB/c mice during L. major infection

BJS commission on surgery and perioperative care post-COVID-19

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the WHO on 11 March 2020 and global surgical practice was compromised. This Commission aimed to document and reflect on the changes seen in the surgical environment during the pandemic, by reviewing colleagues experiences and published evidence. Methods: In late 2020, BJS contacted colleagues across the global surgical community and asked them to describe how severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had affected their practice. In addition to this, the Commission undertook a literature review on the impact of COVID-19 on surgery and perioperative care. A thematic analysis was performed to identify the issues most frequently encountered by the correspondents, as well as the solutions and ideas suggested to address them. Results: BJS received communications for this Commission from leading clinicians and academics across a variety of surgical specialties in every inhabited continent. The responses from all over the world provided insights into multiple facets of surgical practice from a governmental level to individual clinical practice and training. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has uncovered a variety of problems in healthcare systems, including negative impacts on surgical practice. Global surgical multidisciplinary teams are working collaboratively to address research questions about the future of surgery in the post-COVID-19 era. The COVID-19 pandemic is severely damaging surgical training. The establishment of a multidisciplinary ethics committee should be encouraged at all surgical oncology centres. Innovative leadership and collaboration is vital in the post-COVID-19 era

BJS commission on surgery and perioperative care post-COVID-19

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the WHO on 11 March 2020 and global surgical practice was compromised. This Commission aimed to document and reflect on the changes seen in the surgical environment during the pandemic, by reviewing colleagues' experiences and published evidence