Limitations and Pitfalls of FDG-PET/CT in Infection and Inflammation

White blood cells activated by either a pathogen or as part of a systemic inflammatory disease are characterized by high energy consumption and are therefore taking up the glucose analogue PET tracer FDG avidly. It is therefore not surprising that a steadily growing body of research and clinical reports now supports the use of FDG PET/CT to diagnose a wide range of patients with non-oncological diseases. However, using FDG PET/CT in patients with infectious or inflammatory diseases has some limitations and potential pitfalls that are not necessarily as pronounced in oncology FDG PET/CT. Some of these limitations are of a general nature and related to the laborious acquisition of PET images in patients that are often acutely ill, whereas others are more disease-specific and related to the particular metabolism in some of the organs most commonly affected by infections or inflammatory disease. Both inflammatory and infectious diseases are characterized by a more diffuse and less pathognomonic pattern of FDG uptake than oncology FDG PET/CT and the affected organs also typically have some physiological FDG uptake. In addition, patients referred to PET/CT with suspected infection or inflammation are rarely treatment naïve and may have received varying doses of antibiotics, corticosteroids or other immune-modulating drugs at the time of their examination. Combined, this results in a higher rate of false positive FDG findings and also in some cases a lower sensitivity to detect active disease. In this review, we therefore discuss the limitations and pitfalls of FDG PET/CT to diagnose infections and inflammation taking these issues into consideration. Our review encompasses the most commonly encountered inflammatory and infectious diseases in head and neck, in the cardiovascular system, in the abdominal organs and in the musculoskeletal system. Finally, new developments in the field of PET/CT that may help overcome some of these limitations are briefly highlighted

Impact of COVID-19 on cardiovascular testing in the United States versus the rest of the world

Objectives: This study sought to quantify and compare the decline in volumes of cardiovascular procedures between the United States and non-US institutions during the early phase of the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted the care of many non-COVID-19 illnesses. Reductions in diagnostic cardiovascular testing around the world have led to concerns over the implications of reduced testing for cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Methods: Data were submitted to the INCAPS-COVID (International Atomic Energy Agency Non-Invasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19), a multinational registry comprising 909 institutions in 108 countries (including 155 facilities in 40 U.S. states), assessing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on volumes of diagnostic cardiovascular procedures. Data were obtained for April 2020 and compared with volumes of baseline procedures from March 2019. We compared laboratory characteristics, practices, and procedure volumes between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and between U.S. geographic regions and identified factors associated with volume reduction in the United States. Results: Reductions in the volumes of procedures in the United States were similar to those in non-U.S. facilities (68% vs. 63%, respectively; p = 0.237), although U.S. facilities reported greater reductions in invasive coronary angiography (69% vs. 53%, respectively; p < 0.001). Significantly more U.S. facilities reported increased use of telehealth and patient screening measures than non-U.S. facilities, such as temperature checks, symptom screenings, and COVID-19 testing. Reductions in volumes of procedures differed between U.S. regions, with larger declines observed in the Northeast (76%) and Midwest (74%) than in the South (62%) and West (44%). Prevalence of COVID-19, staff redeployments, outpatient centers, and urban centers were associated with greater reductions in volume in U.S. facilities in a multivariable analysis. Conclusions: We observed marked reductions in U.S. cardiovascular testing in the early phase of the pandemic and significant variability between U.S. regions. The association between reductions of volumes and COVID-19 prevalence in the United States highlighted the need for proactive efforts to maintain access to cardiovascular testing in areas most affected by outbreaks of COVID-19 infection

The role of PET/CT in large vessel vasculitis and related disorders: diagnosis, extent evaluation and assessment of therapy response

Large vessel vasculitides (LVV) are defined as chronic inflammatory disorders that affect the arteries with two major variants being distinguished: giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu's arteritis (TAK). These often present with nonspecific constitutional symptoms which makes an accurate diagnosis often challenging. Nevertheless, timely diagnosis is of utmost importance to initiate treatment and to avoid potential life-threatening complications. [18F]FDG-PET/CT is nowadays widely accepted as useful tool to aid in the diagnosis of large vessel vasculitis. However, its role to monitor disease activity and to predict disease relapse during follow-up is less obvious since vascular [18F]FDG uptake can be detected in the absence of clinical or biochemical signs of disease activity. In addition to the two major variants, [18F]FDG-PET/CT has shown promise in (peri-)aortitis and related disorders. This article aims to provide an update on the current knowledge and limitations of [18F]FDG-PET/CT for the diagnosis and assessment of treatment response in LVV. Furthermore, other radiopharmaceuticals targeting key components of the vascular immune system are being discussed which could provide an interesting alternative to image vascular inflammation in LVV

SGLT2 inhibition reduces myocardial oxygen consumption

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: SGLT2 inhibition is associated with a reduced risk of cardiac disease that is still largely unexplained. According to one hypothesis, improved myocardial energetics may explain the cardioprotective effects of SGLT2i. However, recent mechanistic studies that have addressed this question have lacked the power to detect discrete but still clinically significant effects. METHODS: We pooled data from two recent randomized clinical trials and performed a meta-analysis to determine the effect of SGLT2 inhibition on myocardial oxygen consumption and myocardial external efficiency measured by positron emission tomography. RESULTS: SGLT2 inhibition reduced myocardial oxygen consumption (-1.06 [95%CI: 0.22-1.89] mL/100 g/min (n = 59, p = 0.01)), but did not affect myocardial external efficiency (2.22 [95%CI: 0.66-5.11] % (n = 59, p = 0.13)). CONCLUSIONS: /interpretation: SGLT2 inhibition reduces myocardial oxygen consumption at rest, which may contribute to the drugs' cardioprotective effects