8 research outputs found
Hepatosplenic schistosomiasis in field-based studies: a combined clinical and sonographic definition
Oedematogenic Activity Induced By Kunitz-type Inhibitors From Dimorphandra Mollis Seeds.
Proteinase inhibitors from plants represent a form of storage protein or may be involved in plant defense mechanisms against pests and diseases. In this study, we have investigated the oedematogenic activity of DMTI (20 kDa) and DMTI-II (23 kDa), two serine proteinases inhibitors isolated from Dimorphandra mollis (Leguminosae-Mimosoideae) seeds, belonging to the Kunitz family. Paw oedema was induced in male Wistar rats, and measured before and selected times after injection of the proteinase inhibitors. Injection of DMTI-II (3-100 microg/paw) induced a dose-dependent rat paw oedema of rapid onset and short duration, whereas DMTI (3-100 microg/paw) caused a discrete response. The histamine/5-HT receptor antagonist cyproheptadine (2 mg/kg) markedly reduced the DMTI-II-induced oedema. The bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist JE 049 (0.6 mg/kg), the tachykinin NK1 receptor antagonist SR140333 (100 microg/kg) or the NK2 receptor antagonist SR48968 (1 mg/kg) all significantly reduced the DMTI-II-induced oedema. Depletion of sensory neuropeptides by capsaicin also resulted in a significant reduction of oedema formation. In rat isolated peritoneal mast cells, DMTI-II failed to directly release histamine. In conclusion, the proteinase inhibitor DMTI-II induces rat paw oedema by triggering the formation of different inflammatory mediators and pathways, where mast cells and sensory fibers seem to play a pivotal role.47150-
Chronic inhibition of nuclear factor-κB attenuates renal injury in the 5/6 renal ablation model
Impact of a dental care program on the quality of life of children with and without caries
Analisando as pesquisas em educação especial no Brasil Analysing research in special education in Brazil
Nosso objetivo foi examinar a articulação lógica entre o problema e a proposição teórico-metodológica das produções na área da Educação Especial, focando os seus pressupostos epistemológicos. Nos fundamentamos nos pressupostos das tendências empírico-analítica, fenomenológica-hermenêutica, crítico-dialética e do paradigma da complexidade. O procedimento adotado foi interpretar todas as dissertações/teses produzidas nos Programas de Pós-Graduação em Educação e Educação Especial do Brasil, que versam sobre Educação Especial, produzidas nos anos de 2001, 2002 e 2003, disponíveis no banco de teses da CAPES. Encontramos as tendências empírica, fenomenológica e dialética. Os equívocos encontrados foram a não inserção da pesquisa entre as produções na área; ausência de criticidade; não posicionamento numa determinada concepção de educação; construção teórica fundamentada em concepções diferentes; falta de coerência nos pressupostos teórico-metodológicos; não explicitação metodológica; não descrição dos procedimentos éticos; e má elaboração dos resumos. Concluímos pela necessidade da melhoria das dissertações/teses para que possamos avançar na produção de conhecimento na área da Educação Especial.<br>Our objective was to analyze the logical articulation between the problem and the theoretical-methodological proposal of studies in the field of Special Education, focusing on the epistemological issues. We based our study on the empiric-analytical tendencies, phenomenology-hermeneutic, critical-dialectical and the complexity paradigm. The procedure that was adopted was interpreting all dissertations/thesis produced in Post-Graduate programs in Education and Special Education in Brazil, which focus on Special Education, produced in 2001, 2002 and 2003, available online at CAPES' thesis database. We found empirical, phenomenological and dialectic tendencies. The errors encountered included the failure to include the research among the productions in the field; lack of critical approach; lack of making explicit what educational conception the study was based on; theoretical construction based on different conceptions; lack of coherence in the theoretical-methodological proposals; lack of methodological specification; absence of ethical procedural descriptions; and poorly written abstracts. We came to the conclusion that improvements in theses /dissertations are necessary so as to continually move forward in the production of knowledge in the field of Special Education