Prostate Cancer: Added Value of Subtraction Dynamic Imaging in 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging with a Phased-array Body Coil

PURPOSE: To determine the added value of dynamic subtraction magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the localization of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 21 consecutive patients who underwent MR imaging in 3T unit with a phased-array body coil and then had radical prostatectomy. After T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging, we performed a contrast-enhanced dynamic 3D gradient-echo imaging consisting of pre-contrast, 2 successive early-phased (first imaging was started just after the appearance of contrast material in the aortic bifurcation followed by second imaging 35 seconds after the initiation of first imaging) and one 5-minute delayed post-contrast series. Subtraction of pre- contrast images from corresponding post-contrast images of each phase was performed on the console. RESULTS: On ROC analysis, the overall accuracy (Az value) of dynamic imaging combined with subtraction imaging was higher than T2-weighted imaging (p = 0.001) or conventional dynamic imaging alone (p = 0.074) for localization of cancer foci regardless of their zonal locations. Among pathologically verified 81 lesions, the mean volume of detected lesions with the subtraction images (n = 49, 0.69cm3) was smaller than with T2-weighted images (n = 14, 1.05cm3) or conventional dynamic images (n = 43, 0.71cm3). CONCLUSION: For localization of small prostate cancer, additional subtraction for the dynamic imaging could be superior to both T2-weighted imaging and un-subtracted dynamic imaging.ope

ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012

The aim was to develop clinical guidelines for multi-parametric MRI of the prostate by a group of prostate MRI experts from the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR), based on literature evidence and consensus expert opinion. True evidence-based guidelines could not be formulated, but a compromise, reflected by “minimal” and “optimal” requirements has been made. The scope of these ESUR guidelines is to promulgate high quality MRI in acquisition and evaluation with the correct indications for prostate cancer across the whole of Europe and eventually outside Europe. The guidelines for the optimal technique and three protocols for “detection”, “staging” and “node and bone” are presented. The use of endorectal coil vs. pelvic phased array coil and 1.5 vs. 3 T is discussed. Clinical indications and a PI-RADS classification for structured reporting are presented

Evaluation de l'IRM dynamique pour le diagnostic du cancer de prostate (à propos de 46 corrélations imagerie-anatomopathologie)

LYON1-BU Santé (693882101) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF

Prostate Cancer Ablation with Transrectal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound: Assessment of Tissue Destruction with Contrast-enhanced US

Purpose: To assess contrast material-enhanced ultrasonographic (US) findings seen after high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation of prostate cancer and correlate the US findings with post-HIFU biopsy findings.Materials and Methods: The study was ethics committee approved. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-eight patients referred for HIFU prostate cancer ablation underwent contrast-enhanced prostate US before treatment, gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and repeat contrast-enhanced US 1-3 days after treatment, and contrast-enhanced US-guided biopsy 30-45 days after treatment. The contrast-enhanced US enhancement patterns of the biopsy sites-assigned a score of S0 for no enhancement, S1 for mild and/or patchy enhancement, or S2 for marked enhancement-were compared with corresponding biopsy findings, which were assigned a score of B0 for necrosis and/or fibrosis without viable prostate gland tissue, B1 for vascularized tissue without viable gland tissue, or B2 for viable gland tissue (benign or malignant). Then, six additional patients underwent contrast-enhanced prostate US 15-30 minutes and 1 day after HIFU ablation, and the results of these two US examinations were compared.Results: Contrast-enhanced US performed on days 1-3 and days 30-45 after HIFU ablation depicted a large devascularized zone with peripheral enhancing areas that were localized anteriorly in all 28 patients, posteriorly in nine, laterally in five, and at the apex in 20 patients. MR findings were concordant. At biopsy, viable gland tissue was found at nine (6.2%) of 146 S0 sites, 10 (34%) of 29 S1 sites, and 44 (60%) of 73 S2 sites. The odds ratios for finding viable tissue (score B1 or B2) at S1 and S2 sites as opposed to S0 sites were 21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6, 71) and 73 (95% CI: 22, 243), respectively (P < .0001). Contrast-enhanced US performed 15-30 minutes and 1 day after treatment in the six additional patients had similar findings.Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced US is a promising tool for distinguishing between ablated (devascularized) and viable (enhancing) tissue immediately after HIFU treatment. (C)RSNA, 201

Location of residual cancer after transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for clinically localized prostate cancer.

UNLABELLED: What's known on the subject ? and What does the study add? Transrectal High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) ablation has been used as a minimally invasive treatment for localized prostate cancer for 15 years. Five-year disease-free survival rates of 66-78% have been reported, challenging the results of external-beam radiation therapy. Usually, a 6-mm safety margin is used in the apex to preserve the urinary sphincter and potency. The influence of this 6-mm margin on the results of the treatment has never been assessed. This retrospective study of a cohort of 99 patients who underwent systematic biopsy 3-6 months after HIFU ablation for prostate cancer (with a 6-mm safety margin in the apex) shows that post-HIFU residual cancer is found more frequently in the apex. Therefore, new strategies improving the prostate destruction at the apex while preserving the urinary continence need to be found. OBJECTIVE: • To evaluate whether the location (apex/midgland/base) of prostate cancer influences the risk of incomplete transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasonography (HIFU) ablation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • We retrospectively studied 99 patients who underwent prostate cancer HIFU ablation (Ablatherm; EDAP, Vaulx-en-Velin, France) with a 6-mm safety margin at the apex, and had systematic biopsies 3-6 months after treatment. • Locations of positive pre- and post-HIFU sextants were compared. • The present study included two analyses. First, sextants negative before and positive after treatment were recoded as positive/positive, hypothesizing that cancer had been missed at pretreatment biopsy. Second, patients with such sextants were excluded. RESULTS: • Pre-HIFU biopsies found cancer in all patients and in 215/594 sextants (36.2%); 55 (25.6%) positive sextants were in the apex, 86 (40%) in the midgland and 74 (34.4%) in the base. • After treatment, residual cancer was found in 36 patients (36.4%) and 50 sextants (8.4%); 30 (60%) positive sextants were in the apex, 12 (24%) in the midgland and eight (16%) in the base. • Both statistical analyses found that the locations of the positive sextants before and after HIFU ablation were significantly different (P < 0.001), with a higher proportion of positive apical sextants after treatment. • At the first analysis, the mean (95% confidence interval) probability for a sextant to remain positive after HIFU ablation was 8.8% (3.5-20.3%) in the base, 12.7% (5.8-25.9%) in the midgland and 41.7% (27.2-57.89%) in the apex. • At the second analysis, these same probabilities were 5.9% (1.9-17%), 9.9% (3.9-23.2%) and 27.3% (13.7-47%), respectively. CONCLUSION: • When a 6-mm apical safety margin is used, residual cancer after HIFU ablation is found significantly more frequently in the apex

[MR detection of local prostate cancer recurrence after transrectal high-intensity focused US treatment: preliminary results]

International audiencePURPOSE: To assess T2W and dynamic: contrast-enhanced (DCE) MR imaging in the detection of local tumor recurrence after transrectal high-intensity focused US (HIFU) treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients treated by HIFU for prostate cancer were referred for MR due to biological evidence of tumor recurrence. Axial, sagittal and coronal T2W images and DCE images (12 3-mm thick axial images, temporal resolution: 15 seconds) were obtained first. Transrectal biopsies were then obtained under US guidance. MR findings were compared to biopsy results for 10 prostate sectors. RESULTS: Biopsies demonstrated tumor recurrence in 13/15 patients (23/108 sectors). On T2W images, the treated prostate tissue was diffusely hypointense which interfered with interpretation. Three patients (5 sectors) had suspicious areas of T2W signal abnormality and 15 patients (29 sectors) had suspicious areas on DCE scans. An analysis per sector for T2W and DCE imaging showed sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values respectively of 0.13, 0.98, 0.6 and 0.81 and 0.70, 0.85, 0.55 and 0.91. DCE MR was strongly predictive of positive biopsy results (Odds ratio: 12.8 (95% confidence interval: 4.4-37.3)) whereas T2W imaging was not (Odds ratio: 4.0 (95% confidence interval: 0.5-30)). CONCLUSION: MR, especially DCE MR, is promising for the detection and localization of local prostate cancer recurrence after transrectal HIFU treatment